Over the past few weeks, I’ve shared headlines and tweets to illustrate how bureaucratic inefficiency and incompetence have hindered an effective response to the coronavirus.
Time to beat that dead horse one more time.
But not just for the sake of mocking the clowns in Washington. I want to help people understand that we would get better outcomes with a slimmed-down public sector that focused on genuine governmental responsibilities.
Before providing a comprehensive collection of headlines and tweets, please read these excerpts from a searing indictment of the federal government’s incompetence, written by Stephen Pimentel for Palladium.
The FDA’s poor performance has little to do with insufficient budgets… The countries with the most effective responses… Taiwan, for example, has relied on a decentralized set of quickly developed digital tools, coordinated by its DIGI+ digital ministry but developed on the fly by private citizens. ….None of these countries allowed their equivalents of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to block virus-testing and the production of masks.
In the U.S., the FDA possesses exclusive authority to approve tests once the Department of Health and Human Services declares a Public Health Emergency, which it did on January 31, 2020. The FDA proceeded to grant such approval only to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In February, the CDC developed a test on its own and distributed it to state labs. But the test kits had a bad reagent and did not work. During the entire month of February, as the virus continued to spread, the FDA granted no private lab approval to test. The first approval for a private lab was only issued on March 2, 2020. …Why have common surgical masks (and not only the higher-grade N95 masks) run short during the pandemic? Surely they are easy to produce. The answer is that, while they are physically easy to produce, the FDA treats them as regulated medical devices and requires extensive risk analysis and testing before they can be legally sold, making them difficult and time-consuming for a company to legally bring to market. …The American institutions charged with protecting public health are embedded in a bureaucratic culture that values turf-centered gatekeeping and control over effectiveness and outcome.
Now for our collection of headlines and tweets.
And we’ll start with the one that carries the main message of today’s column.
And why are people needlessly suffering? And even dying?
Well, feel free to click on any of these stories and tweets to access the underlying information.
While the FDA and CDC deserve plenty of scorn and criticism, Let’s not forget that states augment the damage of big government thanks to misguided “certificate of need” laws that restrict the capacity of the health sector, as well as laws against so-called price gouging.
The same problem exists to varying degrees in other nations, and also with international bureaucracies.
So what’s today’s message? Here’s a blunt headline that applies to national red tape, local red tape, and global red tape.
That lesson is captured by this image from the Atlas Society.
Once again, we have an answer to the question first asked back in 2009.
P.S. The bad news shared above doesn’t even count the deadly impact of the FDA’s lengthy and expensive process for approving new drugs.
[…] column focused on insights from my five-part series (see here, here, here, here, and here) about the failure of big […]
[…] column focused on insights from my five-part series (see here, here, here, here, and here) about the failure of big […]
[…] private sector reacted quickly (when allowed by sluggish and inefficient government) to the coronavirus pandemic. We quickly got everything from vaccines to […]
[…] 2020 and January 2021, I authored a five-part series (see here, here, here, here, and here) on how big government hindered a quick and effective response to the coronavirus […]
[…] 2020 and January 2021, I authored a five-part series (see here, here, here, here, and here) on how big government hindered a quick and effective response to the coronavirus […]
[…] March 2020 and January 2021, I authored a five-part series (see here, here, here, here, and here) on how big government hindered a quick and effective response to the coronavirus […]
[…] that was the point of a five-part series (see here, here, here, here, and here) on the […]
[…] month, I discussed many of the economic issues associated with coronavirus (fiscal fallout, excess regulation, subsidized unemployment, […]
[…] series about coronavirus and the failure of big government (here, here, here, here, and here), as well as columns specifically highlighting the failures of […]
[…] a five-part series about coronavirus and the failure of big government (here, here, here, here, and here), as well as columns specifically highlighting the failures of the FDA, CDC, and WHO […]
[…] my five-part series on coronavirus and the failure of big government (here, here, here, here, and here), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received some unflattering […]
[…] my five-part series on coronavirus and the failure of big government (here, here, here, here, and here), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received some unflattering […]
[…] a grade, positive or negative, regarding coronavirus. The federal government failed, but those failures largely were independent of the White […]
[…] a grade, positive or negative, regarding coronavirus. The federal government failed, but those failures largely were independent of the White […]
[…] a grade, positive or negative, regarding coronavirus. The federal government failed, but those failures largely were independent of the White […]
[…] wrote a four-part series last year about coronavirus and big government (here, here, here, and here), so it goes without saying that the first two lines of this tweet deserve some sort of accuracy […]
[…] bottom line is that government failed us in 2020. Over and over and over and over […]
[…] incompetent response certainly belongs on this list. We learned, over and over and over and over again, that bloated bureaucracies do not deliver good results. Heck, we’re still learning […]
[…] can add this column to my series (here, here, here, and here) on how government blundering magnified the coronavirus […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2020/04/10/coronavirus-and-the-failure-of-big-government-part-… […]
Reblogged this on kommonsentsjane and commented:
Reblogged on kommonsentsjane/blogkommonsents.
For your information.
kommonsentsjane
[…] last month, I discussed many of the economic issues associated with coronavirus (fiscal fallout, excess regulation, subsidized unemployment, […]
[…] response to the coronavirus has been spectacularly incompetent, well beyond what even libertarians would have predicted, it’s remarkable that Patterson thinks this is a moment in time when people should embrace […]
[…] Not only have they failed in their mission, their red tape and inefficiency have hindered the private sector’s ability to develop and […]
[…] written four columns (here, here, here, and here) on the general failure of government health bureaucracies to effectively respond to the […]
[…] If FDA bureaucrats actually want to save lives, they should focus on their onerous rules and silly regulations that have hampered the private economy’s ability to respond to the […]
[…] crises, at least in this instance they didn’t cause the crisis in the first place (though their policies have hindered an effective […]
[…] The FDA and CDC have failed – As I stated in the interview (and as I’ve repeatedly stated in my columns), the Washington bureaucracies have hindered an effective and rapid response to the […]
When I read about what the WHO said I wonder why the mainstream media outlets only get upset about FOX “spreading disinformation.”
Misleading the public (by accident or otherwise) doesn’t count if a global bureaucracy does it I guess.
For people who have lived several decades, the pattern is quite clear. No matter what the problem is, the solution of Big Government advocates is always more government.
the myth that politicians and government have the solutions to all of our problems is a cherished tenet of the socialist democrats… in a crisis… they always call for more government… more spending… new programs… higher taxes… and less freedom… it’s just what they do… our current situation is not unprecedented… theoretically… we should have an agency in place… with the personnel and expertise to manage this crisis… it should have had an SOP… that activated defensive procedures at the first hint the nation was at risk… but that didn’t happen… it’s a testament to the inefficiency and incompetence of big government… it’s time to re-evaluate government health agencies… update procedures… abandon outdated methodologies and gear up for the next encounter with a virus escaped from a Chinese wet market… or we could use whatever influence that’s necessary to convince the Chinese to close their wet markets… that same level of influence should be exerted on any nation that accepts and allows wet markets to flourish… world wide… how many people have died so that some Chinese gourmet could enjoy his horseshoe bat soup?
but… there is always an inconvenient detail in the narrative… the government viral research lab in Wuhan was only 280 meters away from the wet market…
quite a coincidence eh?
[…] « Coronavirus and the Failure of Big Government, Part IV […]
Reblogged this on Boudica2015.
Well now you’ve gone an pissed off every lefty in the world. Government run healthcare is their holy grail.
We’re never going to get anywhere until we’re honest with our selves about what is going on. The “failures” of “big government” are not bugs, they are the main features.
Normal tyrants kill people in order to seize power. On the other hand, in stark contrast, Communist Globalists seize power so that they can kill people. And when I say “people” I mean us, mainly, but also they the Communist Globalists themselves because they are suicidal maniacs and not just homicidal maniacs.
Do you think that the over 100 million dead in the 20th century, murdered by Communists, was a side show? Well, it was not a side show, it was the center ring event. It was the point of the whole exercise.
They mean to kill everyone, and they are getting better and better at it all the time.