The main problem with America’s health care system is government intervention (Medicare, Medicaid, the tax code’s healthcare exclusion, etc).
The main symptom of all that intervention is pervasive “third-party payer,” which is the term for a system where people buy goods and services with other people’s money.
And pervasive is no exaggeration. According to government data, nearly 90 percent of health care expenditures are paid for by someone other than the consumer.
And that means buyers are not sensitive to price. Which means sellers have little incentive to be efficient and keep prices under control.
The net effect is that the free market is not allowed to operate in most parts of the health care system. So it shouldn’t be a surprise that we have ever-rising costs and lots of bureaucracy.
Let’s look at an example.
One of my former colleagues, Michael Cannon, recently wrote about what happened when Obamacare mandated that birth control be covered by insurance (third-party payer) rather than being directly purchased by consumers.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) dramatically expanded insurance coverage for prescription contraceptives such as “the pill.” From August 2012 through January 2014, the federal government phased in the ACA’s requirement that nearly all private health insurance plans must cover all Food and Drug Administration‐approved prescription contraceptives with no cost‐sharing. …As a result of these changes, the share of consumers who are sensitive to the price of contraceptives plummeted.
…among women with large‐employer coverage who use oral contraceptives, “the share experiencing out‐of‐pocket spending…declined from 94 percent in 2012 to 11 percent in 2017.” …The ACA’s reshaping of the market for oral contraceptives precisely coincided with a dramatic increase in prices for those items. …As the mandate began to take effect and as the ACA made oral contraceptives seem “free” to more purchasers, prices for hormones and oral contraceptives began to rise. …Once the mandate took full effect, prices began to rise rapidly. From May 2013 through May 2019, while real prices for non‐prescription drugs and prescription drugs overall rose just 12 percent and 37 percent, respectively, prices for hormones and oral contraceptives rose 108 percent. …these data suggest that trying to make oral contraceptives “free” for insured consumers had the unintended consequence of making them far more expensive.
Here’s the chart, which is a powerful – and depressing – illustration of how government intervention leads to rising prices.
Notice how birth control costs (the orange line) begin to skyrocket as the Obamacare mandate took effect.
Another depressing thing to consider is that consumers get tricked into thinking that birth control is free.
In reality, of course, the higher costs get built in to the price of health insurance, which then means less take-home pay for the people who thought they were benefiting. But since they don’t understand that this is what’s happening, they decide their employers are too greedy or that compensation is stagnant.
Sigh.
Needless to say, the companies selling birth control lobbied to get their product automatically covered. After all, they knew they could raise prices (as shown in the chart) once customers started buying with other people’s money.
P.S. Several years ago, Sandra Fluke got her 15 minutes of fame by asserting that she had a right to third-party-financed birth control. That led to some clever jokes, including this cartoon, these images, this cartoon, and this video.
P.P.S. When markets are allowed to operate in healthcare, relative prices fall.
P.P.P.S. Government-created third-party payer is also generating higher costs and needless bureaucracy in higher education.
[…] You can see the impact (or lack thereof) of third-party payer by looking at prices for birth control, plastic surgery, and […]
[…] about the potential impact of “third-party payer.” In all likelihood, producers will take advantage of this new entitlement by increasing […]
[…] This is illustrated very clearly by this chart. […]
[…] This is illustrated very clearly by this chart. […]
[…] control is not the same as a belief in subsidized birth control. Especially when such policies are a recipe for higher costs and corrupt […]
[…] sanslöst dyr eftersom folk måste betala ur egen ficka. Tvärtom. Den blev sanslöst dyr eftersom färre betalar mindre ur egen ficka än någonsin. Nästan 90% av sjukvårdskostnader betalas av någon annan än patienten nämligen […]
There is also the problem that health systems are complex and we do not know the same information generally as the health care provider.
Items such as the CPAP filters mentioned above can and should be treated as disposables but how do you negotiate the best and most cost effective treatment of the price for that treatment for cancer the extent of which may be unknown until the surgery.
My CPAP supplies are grossly overpriced when purchased through Medicare. The filters, as an example, are 3-7x more expensive when obtained through Medicare that when buying them from Amazon. By design I believe, it is extremely difficult to track to purchase cost of these items.
When I buy consumable supplies, I receive a CMS statement that has the items encoded and they correlate to nothing else I see. But I can figure out what is what by looking at quantities. A year’s supply of my CPA filters can be purchased from Amazon with a couple of clicks for less than $20.
My CMS bill (forgot exact $) but shows a quarters supply (3 months) of filters is billed for $50. Have no fear, as CMS’s powerful bargaining abilities save money and they pay only $25. My Supplemental policy kicks in another $7. I’m left to pay $3. Thus, one quarter for these filters is $35 or $140 for a year for something I can buy for less than $20 on Amazon.
I’m out of pocket only $12 as opposed to $20. But it is obvious the procurement system is grossly inefficient. It would be easier and less expensive if CMS gave me $50 to get my own filters.
With 90% covered by third party payers, patients don’t care about prices.
For the 10% that attempts to purchase for themselves, they receive the highest prices, since they don’t get a “group” discount.