I pointed out yesterday that Donald Trump has increased domestic spending at a faster rate than Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, or Jimmy Carter.
The day before, I castigated him for proposing a budget that expands the burden of government spending by $2 trillion over the next decade.
And two days before that, I explained that he hasn’t really changed the trend line on jobs.
So it’s safe to say I don’t go out of my way to say nice things.
But I’m also very fair. I don’t hesitate to praise politicians whenever they do good things, or to point out evidence that their policies are having a desirable effect.
And here’s a tweet that suggest Trump has made a positive difference.
This is an amazing shift.
Especially since Trump hasn’t actually fixed the problems that lead some successful people to expatriate.
- We still have worldwide taxation.
- We still have a death tax.
- We still have double taxation of saving and investment.
- We still have FATCA.
But he has moved policy in the right direction is some of those areas thanks to the 2017 tax legislation.
His other achievement, which is probably even more important, is that he’s not Hillary Clinton. In other words, we’re not getting the bad tax policies that might have occurred in a Clinton Administration.
So it’s understandable that there’s been a big drop in the number of expatriates. The type of people who might move (the “canaries in the coal mine“) now think things are getting better rather than worse.
By the way, we’re talking about small numbers of people. But they’re often exactly the type of people – entrepreneurs, inventors, and innovators – that help drive growth.
P.S. I’ll add today’s column to my collection of noteworthy tweets.
- Best tweet about capitalism vs socialism.
- The most depressing tweet.
- Trump’s worst-ever tweet.
- The best-ever counter-tweet.
- The best-ever tweet about inequality.
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] speculated last year that the 2016-2019 drop was an indicator that Trump’s tax cut was having a positive impact. […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] in the study from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, is that some rich people will become tax expatriates and move to jurisdictions (not just places such as Monaco, Bermuda, or the Cayman […]
[…] in the study from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, is that some rich people will become tax expatriates and move to jurisdictions (not just places such as Monaco, Bermuda, or the Cayman Islands, but any […]
[…] The most-flattering tweet about Trump’s policy. […]
[…] most-flattering tweet about Trump’s […]
[…] is that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
[…] is that this ratio could flip after the election. Indeed, it may already be happening even though recent data on expatriation paints a rosy […]
Actually the story is much more complex and the reality is that the Wealthy are still leaving in record numbers. It is explained in this blog https://lesperanceassociates.com/blog/americans-renouncing-u-s-citizenship/
Reblogged this on Freedom Is Just Another Word….
Dan, as a fellow Dawg and long-time reader of your content and admirer of your fantastic work promoting the good word of limited government and economic liberty, I have to say that I’m disappointed in your constant bad-mouthing of Donald Trump’s presidency. In fact, I think you’re missing the forest for the trees. While Trump may not have changed all the critical trend lines statistically, he has done more to promote America as a free, capitalist, sovereign nation than any leader in decades. You appear to be holding his administration to a totally unrealistic standard, as there is no way any prez could effectively implement the libertarian dream regime that you envision. But you appear to consider Trump no different than Obama. I can’t begin to explain how far off you are on that. Trump has changed the entire dialogue in this country for the better when it comes to trade, multilateral agreements, foreign incursions, national sovereignty, protection of American culture and traditions, border enforcement, immigration, and perhaps most importantly, standing up to China. These changes are in many regards psychological and have come about on the margins. But make no mistake, his leadership has completely disrupted and reinvented the way this country sees itself in the world, and reinvigorated its case for growth and economic liberty. It has also put the rest of the world on notice. Your constant bashing of the tariffs, for example, have missed the point. The tariffs are a necessary evil to get past the regrettable situation we’ve found ourselves in with respect to mercantilist China. Tariffs were our biggest bargaining chip to improve trade relationships with allies and adversaries alike, and they are the stepping stone to something much better than where we have been for the past three decades. It’s maddening that you cannot see that. And while the spending is a clear issue, look at tax receipts and overall gdp growth in absolute numbers. We may be running higher household debt, but we are making a lot more money, with plenty of tailwinds to come. Don’t get me started on the long-term benefits of constitutionalist judges throughout the federal government. The Trump admin is one of the two or three most consequential presidencies for free market advocates of the past 100 years. You seem to be over-selling the shortcomings and drastically under-appreciating the positives, which are legion and will resonate for decades.
You’re right, @bluecat57, that it’s important to consider which party controls Congress. But let’s not forget that presidents have a veto pen. What upsets me about Trump is that all the spending has been imposed with his support. Reagan, by contrast, fought against spending and that’s why he got much better results. Even though Democrats controlled the House all 8 years of his presidency. https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2020/02/11/mirror-mirror-on-the-wall-which-modern-president-is-the-biggest-spender-of-all/
Presidents do NOT “spend” anything. Until we properly place the blame for the out of control federal budget with the House of Representatives first, and then the Senate, there will be no change. The only thing the President can do is veto the spending bill and allow the DISCRETIONARY portion of the government to shut down until CONGRESS sends him a bill that CUTS spending.