I’ve just finished up a week of teaching at Northeastern University in Shenyang, China.
I mostly taught public finance and explained issues such as marginal tax rates, double taxation, the Rahn Curve, the Laffer Curve, and the fiscal implications of demographic change.
I also gave a lecture on comparative economics and looked at nations that converged or diverged over several decades. And this lecture included some material on China’s impressive (but still incomplete) reforms and subsequent growth.
The goal of the classes was to make the students aware of key issues rather than to proselytize.
But one thing I noticed in the class discussions is that students were under the impression that capitalism was mostly for the benefit of the rich.
I tried to preemptively deal with that question by recycling my charts showing how poverty fell dramatically after China shifted toward free markets.
That’s very compelling data, as far as I’m concerned, but I’m not overly confident the students were similarly impressed.
So in future years, I think I’m going to steal some data from Professor Ken Schoolland, who was also part of the faculty.
It’s from a xerox, so the resolution isn’t the best, but This data showing changes in income distribution between 1980 and 2008 is very powerful.
As you can see, almost everybody was very poor back in 1980, which was about when China began liberalizing its economy.
By 1995, a significant share of the population climbed out of poverty.
And the 2008 numbers show that a majority of the population was middle class or above.
Very impressive. It seems a rising tide does lift all boats.
To be sure, China hasn’t turned into a mainland version of Hong Kong. It’s not even close to Taiwan.
But you don’t need perfection. Chinese data confirms that partial reforms (what I call giving an economy “breathing room“) can generate significant benefits.
P.S. There’s also data on how incomes have expanded over time for both the United States and the entire world.
P.P.S. Much to my dismay, I forgot to inform the student about how the IMF and the OECD want to sabotage China’s economy.
Addendum: Thanks to @Mike Mendyke for a much cleaner version of the visual.
[…] liberalization starting in 1979, which generated very positive results. As a result, there was a significant increase in living standards and a huge reduction in poverty. But that progress has ground to a […]
[…] economic liberalization late last century, and those reforms should be applauded because they were very successful in reducing severe […]
[…] it even happened to some degree in China when there was partial […]
[…] there was then a bit of economic liberalization starting in 1979. As a result, there’s been a significant increase in living standards and a huge reduction in […]
[…] poor nations such as Botwsana and China can enjoy meaningful gains with partial economic […]
[…] poor nations such as Botwsana and China can enjoy meaningful gains with partial economic […]
[…] For more wonky readers, I suggest this data and this data about China and this data about the […]
[…] For more wonky readers, I suggest this data and this data about China and this data about the […]
[…] For more wonky readers, I suggest this data and this data about China and this data about the […]
[…] For more wonky readers, I suggest this data and this data about China and this data about the […]
[…] For more wonky readers, I suggest this data and this data about China and this data about the […]
[…] I want China to liberalize and prosper. That would be good for the people of China and it would be good for the world. I’m simply […]
[…] My hope, for what it’s worth, is that China’s leaders reverse the current trend and resume the 1979-2000 path of economic liberalization that was so successful in reducing mass poverty. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. If nothing else, China shows us why policy makers should focus on growth rather than equality. […]
[…] shift toward markets (which started in a village) helped to dramatically reduce poverty and turn China into a middle-income […]
Somehow it bothered me that your chart was an old Xerox so I cleaned it up in Photoshop for next time you want to use it: http://itsnewstoyou.com/img/Dan.Mitchell.China.jpg
Keep up the good fight
All revolutions emanate from the middle class. The poor have everything to lose so they do not agitate and the rich will enforce the status quo. The Chinese fear any backslide in the economy. As those who had money, but lost money become by nature become revolutionary. The middle class what “something more” and the former rich want what they had. These reasons and more are behind the social credit system and the great firewall. The population must become dependant upon the state’s opinion of themselves and be totally isolated from revolutionary ideas. All nations, in time, lose the battle on controlling their populations. Do the Chinese want a larger middle class is the question as those are the people who become the core to any revolution?
As always, very interesting and informative. Cheers.
Terry Jones
Associate Editor
Investor’s Business Daily