I periodically explain that a European-sized welfare state can only be financed by huge taxes on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers.
Simply stated, there aren’t enough rich people to prop up big government. Moreover, at the risk of mixing my animal metaphors, those golden geese also have a tendency to fly away if they’re being treated like fatted calves.
I have some additional evidence to share on this issue, thanks to a new report from the Tax Foundation. The research specifically looks at the tax burden on the average worker in developed nations
The tax burden on labor is referred to as a “tax wedge,” which simply refers to the difference between an employer’s cost of an employee and the employee’s net disposable income.
…The OECD calculates the tax burden by adding together the income tax payment, employee-side payroll tax payment, and employer-side payroll tax payment of a worker earning the average wage in a country. …Although payroll taxes are typically split between workers and their employers, economists generally agree that both sides of the payroll tax ultimately fall on workers.
The bad news for workers (and the good news for politicians) is that average workers in the advanced world loses more than one-third of their income to government.
In some cases, such as the unfortunate Spanish household I wrote about back in February, the government steals two-thirds of a worker’s income.
So which country is best for workers and which is worst?
Here’s a look at a map showing the tax burden for selected European nations.
Suffice to say, it’s not good to be dark red.
But that map doesn’t provide a complete answer.
To really determine the best and worst countries, the Tax Foundation made an important correction to the OECD data by including the burden of the value-added tax. Here’s why it matters.
The tax burden on labor is broader than personal income taxes and payroll taxes. In many countries individuals also pay a value-added tax (VAT) on their consumption. Because a VAT diminishes the purchasing power of individual earnings, a more complete picture of the tax burden should include the VAT. Although the United States does not have a VAT, state sales taxes also work to diminish the purchasing power of earnings. Accounting for VAT rates and bases in OECD countries increased the tax burden on labor by 5 percentage-points on average in 2018.
And with that important fix, we can confidently state that the worst country for ordinary workers is Belgium, followed by Germany, Austria, France, and Italy.
The best country, assuming we’re limiting the conversation to rich countries, is Switzerland, followed by New Zealand, South Korea, Israel, and the United States.
By the way, this report just looks at the tax burden on average workers. We would also need estimates of the tax burden on things such as investment, business, and entrepreneurship to judge the overall merit (or lack thereof) of various tax regimes.
Let’s close by looking at the nations that have moved the most in the right direction and wrong direction this century.
Congratulations to Hungary, Israel, and Sweden.
I’m not surprised to see Mexico galloping in the wrong direction, though I’m disappointed that South Korea and Iceland are also deteriorating.
P.S. The bottom line is that global evidence confirms that ordinary people will be the ones paying the tab if Crazy Bernie and AOC succeed in expanding the burden of government spending in America. Though they’re not honest enough to admit it.
[…] But what if Americans only earn more because they work longer hours? When my left-of-center friends make this argument, my usual response has been that Americans choose to work longer hours because they have better incentives (i.e., lower tax rates). […]
[…] And he didn’t say “let’s have much higher payroll tax rates” like they have in Europe. […]
[…] And he didn’t say “let’s have much higher payroll tax rates” like they have in Europe. […]
[…] it sounds like an exaggeration to take away $7, just think about Senor Alvarez in […]
[…] it sounds like an exaggeration to take away $7, just think about Senor Alvarez in […]
[…] it sounds like an exaggeration to take away $7, just think about Senor Alvarez in […]
[…] it sounds like an exaggeration to take away $7, just think about Senor Alvarez in […]
[…] In other words, there’s less economic dynamism because the reward for being productive is lower in Europe (which is simply another way of saying taxes are higher in Europe). […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] reminds people that “free” government in Europe is actually very, very, expensive for ordinary […]
[…] that’s not the case. As illustrated by this unfortunate Spaniard, ordinary people in Europe get fleeced by their […]
[…] that’s not the case. As illustrated by this unfortunate Spaniard, ordinary people in Europe get fleeced by their […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] means fewer people trapped in government dependency in America. And it means a smaller tax burden in […]
[…] P.P.S. Adding everything together, the biggest differencebetween the United States and other developed nations is that lower-income and middle-class taxpayers in America enjoy far lower tax burdens. […]
[…] P.P.S. Adding everything together, the biggest differencebetween the United States and other developed nations is that lower-income and middle-class taxpayers in America enjoy far lower tax burdens. […]
[…] P.P.S. Adding everything together, the biggest difference between the United States and other developed nations is that lower-income and middle-class taxpayers in America enjoy far lower tax burdens. […]
[…] because there’s generally more economic freedom in the United States – including lower tax burdens and less enervating […]
[…] United States has a big income advantage over European nations, but it’s driven by hours worked rather than […]
[…] United States has a big income advantage over European nations, but it’s driven by hours worked rather than […]
[…] P.S. Not only do ordinary Americans have a big edge over their European counterparts, they also enjoy much lower taxes. […]
Love watching Sun !
[…] Think of all the programs the Bern and progressives/socialists could enact—Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, free college education, and providing a living income to those who choose not to work would fly through the state legislature in pursuit of the socialist utopia. The problem is that all these government programs have been shown to lower economic output, because they divert lots of money to unproductive ventures. Lots of money means lots of taxes on everyone. […]
[…] Think of all the programs the Bern and progressives/socialists could enact—Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, free college education, and providing a living income to those who choose not to work would fly through the state legislature in pursuit of the socialist utopia. The problem is that all these government programs have been shown to lower economic output, because they divert lots of money to unproductive ventures. Lots of money means lots of taxes on everyone. […]
[…] Think of all the programs the Bern and progressives/socialists could enact—Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, free college education, and providing a living income to those who choose not to work would fly through the state legislature in pursuit of the socialist utopia. The problem is that all these government programs have been shown to lower economic output, because they divert lots of money to unproductive ventures. Lots of money means lots of taxes on everyone. […]
[…] Think of all the programs the Bern and progressives/socialists could enact—Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, free college education, and providing a living income to those who choose not to work would fly through the state legislature in pursuit of the socialist utopia. The problem is that all these government programs have been shown to lower economic output, because they divert lots of money to unproductive ventures. Lots of money means lots of taxes on everyone. […]
[…] Think of all the programs the Bern and progressives/socialists could enact—Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, free college education, and providing a living income to those who choose not to work would fly through the state legislature in pursuit of the socialist utopia. The problem is that all these government programs have been shown to lower economic output, because they divert lots of money to unproductive ventures. Lots of money means lots of taxes on everyone. […]
[…] Think of all the programs the Bern and progressives/socialists could enact—Medicare for All, the Green New Deal, free college education, and providing a living income to those who choose not to work would fly through the state legislature in pursuit of the socialist utopia. The problem is that all these government programs have been shown to lower economic output, because they divert lots of money to unproductive ventures. Lots of money means lots of taxes on everyone. […]
[…] to data from the Tax Foundation and OECD, middle-income Finnish taxpayers are forced to surrender about 15 percent more of their […]
[…] Somehow, I suspect America’s middle-class does not want to be pillaged like their European counterparts. […]
[…] muchos regalos financiados por los contribuyentes, pero habría un alto precio. Los impuestos consumen casi el 50 por ciento del ingreso promedio de una familia (incluso más alto según algunas […]
[…] would get lots of taxpayer-financed freebies, but there would be a heavy price. Taxes consume nearly 50 percent of an average family’s income (even higher according to some […]
[…] The dirty little secret, of course, is that lower-income and middle-class taxpayers are the ones being mistreated. […]
[…] pointed out that there’s no nation in the world that finances a big welfare state without high tax burdens on ordinary people – generally steep value-added taxes, along with onerous payroll taxes and high income tax […]
[…] such as Sweden and the Netherlands might fall, while other countries such as Chile and Poland (and probably the U.S.) would […]
[…] on the other side of the Atlantic, there’s no way to finance a European-sized welfare state with pillaging ordinary people. Especially since upper-income taxpayers can change their behavior to avoid most tax […]
[…] this policy doesn’t affect social insurance taxes and value-added taxes, which are actually the biggest burden for ordinary workers in many Eastern European […]
[…] the deadweight loss can be significant if the overall tax burden is sufficiently onerous (as is the case in many European […]