When I think about social welfare spending, I mostly worry about recipients getting trapped in dependency.
But I also feel sorry for taxpayers, who are bearing ever-higher costs to finance redistribution programs.
Today’s column won’t focus on those issues. Instead, we’re going to utilize new OECD data to compare the size of the welfare states in developed nations.
We’ll start with the big picture. Here it total redistribution spending, measured as a share of economic output, for selected countries that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Nobody will be surprised, I assume, to see that France, Finland, Belgium, Denmark, and Italy have the biggest welfare states.
The United States is in the middle of the pack. American taxpayers might be surprised to learn, though, that they finance a bigger welfare state than the ones that exist in Canada, Iceland, and the Netherlands.
The overall numbers are important, but it’s also educational to consider the various components.
And the largest chunk of social spending in most nations is for their old-age programs. The biggest burdens are found in Greece, Italy, France, Portugal, and Austria. The United States, once again, is in the middle of the pack.
By the way, keep in mind that there are many factors that determine why some nations spend more than others.
- How generous are benefits? – This is often measured as the “replacement rate,” which compares retirement benefits to income during working years.
- When can people retire? – Some countries allow people, or some classes of people, to get benefits while relatively young. Others are more stringent.
- Does a country have an aging population? – Demographic changes already are beginning to have a large effect on the finances of some systems.
- Is there a private savings system? – Nations such as Switzerland, Australia, Chile, and the Netherlands have significant private retirement savings.
Now let’s look at government spending on health.
Here’s the area where the United States is more extravagant than almost every other nation. Only France spends more money.
Actually, since per-capita GDP is significantly larger in the United States than in France, American taxpayers spend more on a per-person basis.
Some people will observe, with great justification, that the data for the United States may be a measure of the inefficiency of the American system rather than taxpayer generosity. This is a topic for another day.
Last but not least, let’s look at traditional welfare. In other words, cash assistance to the working-age population.
The fiscal burden of this spending is highest in Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Luxembourg. The United States, meanwhile, is comparatively frugal.
P.S. Here are a couple of caveats for number crunchers and policy wonks.
First, there are methodological challenges when comparing OECD nations. Eastern European nations tend to be significantly less prosperous than Western European nations, thanks to decades of communist enslavement. So looking at this data does not really allow for apples-to-apples comparisons. Moreover, there are a handful of developing nations that belong to the OECD, such as Mexico and Turkey, so comparison are effectively meaningless. And Chile is on the cusp of becoming a fully developed nation so it’s in its own category.
Second, as I briefly mentioned above, nations have different levels of per-capita GDP. If we look at the last chart, Austria and Spain spend a similar share of GDP on welfare, but since Austria is a richer nation, its taxpayers actually finance a lot more per-capita welfare spending. The same is true if you compare Canada and Estonia, Sweden and Slovenia, and Germany and Greece.
P.P.S. There was virtually no welfare state in OECD nations prior to the 1930s and very small welfare states until the 1960s. For what it’s worth, the huge reduction in poverty in those nations occurred before the welfare state.
[…] The United States has a medium-sized welfare state and nations in Western Europe have large-sized welfare states. […]
[…] third-highest level of pension spending in the […]
[…] in the chart. Indeed, most of those countries presumably have policies that are worse (such as bigger welfare states) than what we have in the United […]
[…] in the chart. Indeed, most of those countries presumably have policies that are worse (such as bigger welfare states) than what we have in the United […]
[…] not consistent with Singapore’s approach. And South Korea has a relatively small welfare state compared to other OECD nations. Heck, the United States had no welfare state back in the […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] stated, America’s medium-sized welfare state doesn’t do as much damage as the large-sized welfare states in […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] For what it’s worth, I’m not quite as positive about the United States as Henninger. Our welfare state is a significant burden, though he is right that it is smaller than the welfare states in Europe. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, I’m not quite as positive about the United States as Henninger. Our welfare state is a significant burden, though he is right that it is smaller than the welfare states in Europe. […]
[…] the U.S. collects proportionately more taxes from the rich is that other developed countries have bigger welfare states, and that necessarily leads to much higher tax burdens on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] been warning, over and over and over again, that a European-style welfare state means huge tax increases on ordinary […]
[…] the U.S. collects proportionately more taxes from the rich is that other developed countries have bigger welfare states, and that necessarily leads to much higher tax burdens on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers […]
[…] the U.S. collects proportionately more taxes from the rich is that other developed countries have bigger welfare states, and that necessarily leads to much higher tax burdens on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers […]
[…] the U.S. collects proportionately more taxes from the rich is that other developed countries have bigger welfare states, and that necessarily leads to much higher tax burdens on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers […]
[…] the U.S. collects proportionately more taxes from the rich is that other developed countries have bigger welfare states, and that necessarily leads to much higher tax burdens on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers […]
[…] the U.S. collects proportionately more taxes from the rich is that other developed countries have bigger welfare states, and that necessarily leads to much higher tax burdens on lower-income and middle-class taxpayers […]
[…] I’m also interested in measures of fiscal competitiveness (best tax system, worst tax system, costliest welfare state, […]
[…] I’m also interested in measures of fiscal competitiveness (best tax system, worst tax system, costliest welfare state, […]
[…] Lower-than-average spending burden. […]
[…] also ranks as the worst of the worst when looking just at spending on social welfare […]
[…] Lower-than-average spending burden. […]
[…] Lower-than-average spending burden. […]
[…] And that’s almost certainly because there’s generally more economic freedom in the United States – including lower tax burdens and less enervating redistribution. […]
[…] moral of the story is that the countries with the biggest welfare states are not necessarily the nations with the most government control over the allocation of labor and […]
[…] Mitchell, D. (2019), Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Which Nation Has the Biggest Welfare State of All?, International Liberty, 26. januára 2019. Dostupné online: https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2019/01/26/mirror-mirror-on-the-wall-which-nation-has-the-bigg… […]
[…] France? There’s no welfare state in the former, but lots of opportunity, whereas France has plenty of handouts but not much hope for upward […]
[…] Mitchell: International Comparison of Welfare States […]
I am a capitalist, and have a real dread of full-on Socialism or indeed Democratic Socialism. That said, there is (in my opinion) a very real risk of people who have not benefited from the “rising boats” concept turning away from capitalism to any alternative that is on offer. And by that, I mean any political system that commits more spending of monies on those who are not able or capable of enjoying the benefits of capitalism.
It really is time to re-examine capitalism as we know it and rethink how it can embrace more people into its fold.
The alternative is not bearable, let alone financially doable.
How can anyone defend an Unregulated Market Economy based on Capitalism; when David Stockman and so many others; have said the Rich & Powerful have corrupted both Capitalism and our Monetary System in a manner that let’s our Puppet Masters predetermine, Winners & Losers; thus, grossly screwing the weakest among us; the Middle Class and the Working Poor. It all played out so vividly with the Crash of 2008. For, we have learned that Capitalism without tough rules, regulations; & OS; becomes a License to Steal. The Middle Class lost about 1/2 of it’s Net Worth in the Predatory Economic Crash of 2008.
The Republicans have orchestrated the Nation’s last FIVE Recessions (1981, 1987, 1991, 2001; and 2008. Those recession wiped out over 16 million jobs; leading to the loan debacles in Real Estate, Student Loans, Auto Loans; & False run-ups in the Stock Market.
Buffet maintains the unsuspecting Middle Class didn’t stand a chance; when unregulated Bomb makers concocted in the Boiler Rooms of Wall Street; what Buffet chooses to call, “Financial Weapons of Mass Destruction.”
Many Americans are now thinking we must examine new Economic Systems – – yes; even Democratic Socialism; and, we had better do it; before the Elites take it all! Never have so few, stolen so much from so many; and, the sad thing about it; they got away with it! Both Democratic & Capitalistic Checks failed because they were so badly corrupted, and manipulated; they had no teeth to enforce anything.
Potpourri: Who is paid a Billion Dollars for – – supposedly – – work efforts in a single year? Impossible U say; can’t happen! Well; it has happened more than once on Wall Street. In 2010; 20 Hedge Fund Brokers each received a Billion Dollars for bringing home the Bacon – – so-to-speak!
The Systems (Social, Economic, & Political) are all corrupted beyond repair; regardless of what Conservatives tell us. And the really sad fact is that Doubters may finally get the Message with the coming of another Crash; and, it is likely to be far, far worse than the one in 2008. Wise up – – buckle up!
[…] I also recognize that the biggest fiscal problem, both in American and elsewhere in the world, is that there’s too much government […]
[…] wisely warns that failures by national governments (most notably unaffordable welfare states and incompetent administrative states) are creating openings for unpalatable […]
[…] what if the United States had a large-sized welfare state, like the ones that burden many European […]
[…] But I’m nonetheless skeptical. I suspect the French (including the Yellow Vests) would be rioting in the streets if the government proposed to curtail the nation’s bloated welfare state. […]
[…] P.P.S. Under Soviet rule, Czechoslovakia was genuine socialism (i.e., government ownership, central planning, price controls), which obviously is more damaging than what many people think of today as socialism (i.e., punitive taxes and a big welfare state). […]
[…] tiene un historial de tasas impositivas superiores al 100 por ciento, sino que también tiene el dudoso honor de ser el mayor Estado de bienestar de […]
[…] P.P.S. Under Soviet rule, Czechoslovakia was genuine socialism (i.e., government ownership, central planning, price controls), which obviously is more damaging than what many people think of today as socialism (i.e., punitive taxes and a big welfare state). […]
[…] ownership, central planning, price controls) and the everyday definition (lots of redistribution), I’m wondering whether I should use “welfare state” rather than “democratic socialism”? […]
[…] Pero obviamente ese no es el caso. En cambio, Grecia es una marea de derechos caros . […]
[…] (government ownership, central planning, price controls) and the everyday definition (lots of redistribution), I’m wondering whether I should use “welfare state” rather than […]
[…] After all, not only does France have a history of imposing 100-percent-plus tax rates, it also hold the dubious honor of being Europe’s biggest welfare state. […]
[…] But that’s obviously not the case. Instead, Greece is a morass of expensive entitlements. […]
[…] true that all of those nations, after they became prosperous, then chose to adopt welfare states of various sizes. That was an unfortunate development (though somewhat offset by trade liberalization and other […]
These OECD Health expenditure figures are wrong. See link below.
USA 17.2% of GDP
Switzerland 12.3% of GDP
France 11.5%
Germany 11.3%
https://data.oecd.org/healthres/health-spending.htm
PPPS: I haven’t diagnosed this specific OECD report. If it follows the methodologies of similar ones they do and given the specific numbers they report here, the USA’s low position on welfare spending share of GDP is largely because the USA has a large proportion of its welfare payments classified as “non-cash” — such as food stamps and public housing. These are not counted for the USA, but are for other countries, either because they are organized differently or they don’t define “cash” as narrowly as the USA does. In the past, correcting for that problem puts USA in mid-pack as in other indicators.
[…] Mitchell provides some handy bar charts to show international figures on social welfare spending, pension spending and public health […]