Today is my last day in Chile, so today’s column will build upon what I wrote last week.
I have three charts that illustrate how Chile’s pro-market reforms have been great news – especially for poor people (or, to be more accurate, for Chileans who used to be poor).
We’ll start with this chart from the most recent issue of Economía y Sociedad, which shows that there’s more mobility in Chile than any other OECD nation.
Honest folks on the left should view this as unambiguously positive.
Similarly, this Gini data (measuring the degree of inequality) should be slam-dunk evidence of progress for all left-of-center people.
For what it’s worth, I don’t care about the Gini coefficient. What matters to me is economic growth so that everyone can get richer.
If rich people happen to get richer faster than poor people (like in China), that’s fine.
And if poor people happen to get richer faster than rich people (like in Chile), that’s fine as well.
What irks me is that folks who fixate on inequality often support policies that retard growth. In other words, they’re so worried about rich people getting richer that they advocate for bigger government, which makes it harder for poor people to become richer.
Economic growth, by contrast, truly is the rising tide that lifts all boats.
Which is why this final chart (based on the Maddison database) is so powerful. It shows 1975-2016 income trends for Chile (red) and other major Latin American economies. As you can see, Chile started near the bottom and is now the region’s richest nation.
Wow, Chile didn’t just converge. It surpassed.
It’s also worth noting how nations such as Argentina, Venezuela, and Cuba have enjoyed very little income growth over the past 40 years.
The bottom line is that those nations are evidence of the costly impact of statism, while Chile is an amazing example of how capitalism generates widely shared prosperity.
P.S. I’m not claiming Chile is a perfect role model. It is #15 in Economic Freedom of the World, so there is considerable room for improvement. But I am arguing it is a successful example of how better policy is great news for all segments of society.
[…] The shift toward free markets, which began in the mid-1970s, was especially beneficial for the less fortunate (see here, here, and here). […]
[…] The shift toward free markets, which began in the mid-1970s, was especially beneficial for the less fortunate (see here, here, and here). […]
[…] I have a three-part series (here, here, and here) on how low-income people have been big winners as a result of Chile’s shift to free […]
[…] The shift toward free markets, which began in the mid-1970s, was especially beneficial for the less fortunate (see here, here, and here). […]
[…] I have a three-part series (here, here, and here) on how low-income people have been big winners as a result of Chile’s shift to free […]
[…] free-market reforms have been especially beneficial to poor people (see here, here, here, and here), I wonder they understand how Boric’s election would threaten their upward […]
[…] that Chile’s free-market reforms dramatically reduced poverty (for more details, see here, here, and […]
[…] I have a three-part series (here, here, and here) on how low-income people have been big winners as a result of Chile’s shift to free […]
[…] I have a three-part series (here, here, and here) on how low-income people have been big winners as a result of Chile’s shift to free […]
[…] The shift toward free markets, which began in the mid-1970s, was especially beneficial for the less fortunate (see here, here, and here). […]
[…] run nations such as Argentina, they would be demanding that the country copy the very successful poverty-reducing policies in neighboring […]
[…] The shift toward free markets, which began in the mid-1970s, was especially beneficial for the less fortunate (see here, here, and here). […]
[…] The shift toward free markets, which began in the mid-1970s, was especially beneficial for the less fortunate (see here, here, and here). […]
[…] let’s not digress. I want to close by noting that poor people have been the biggest winners from Chile’s free-market […]
[…] the way, I have several columns (here, here, here, and here) documenting how poor people have been the big winners from Chile’s pro-market […]
[…] the way, I have several columns (here, here, here, and here) documenting how poor people have been the big winners from Chile’s pro-market […]
[…] de 1970 y luego mejoró significativamente en las clasificaciones al liberalizar la economía y reducir la carga del gobierno en la década de 1980. Otro recordatorio de que el mundo es un laboratorio y que cada […]
[…] place in the 1970s and then significantly improved in the rankings by liberalizing the economy and reducing the burden of government in the 1980s. Yet another reminder that the world is a laboratory and every experiment tells us the […]
[…] Moreover, the country is ranked #21 for economic freedom out of 162 nations in Economic Freedom of the World, with a score of 7.80. That’s just .05 behind Taiwan and .09 behind Chile. […]
[…] I’ve explained on many occasions that lower-income people in Chile have been the biggest beneficiaries of pro-market […]
[…] I visited Chile about a year ago and finished a three-part series (here, here, and here) showing how the less fortunate have been the biggest […]
[…] disappointed, by the way, that Chile is only ranked […]
[…] every possible measure, Chile is the most successful country in Latin […]
[…] Kong, Singapore, Chile, and Botswana are very good […]
See my https://mises.org/library/direct-chile for another piece on this issue.