America’s healthcare system is a mess, largely because government intervention (Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and the tax code’s healthcare exclusion) have produced a system where consumers almost never directly pay for their medical services.
This “third-party payer” system basically means market forces are absent. Consumers have very little reason to focus on cost, after all, if taxpayers or insurance companies are picking up the tab for nearly 90 percent of expenses.
As a result, we get ever-higher prices.
But we also get a lot of featherbedding and inefficiency because providers want to take advantage of this system.
Athenahealth offered some sobering analysis on the system last year.
The number of physicians in the United States grew 150 percent between 1975 and 2010, roughly in keeping with population growth, while the number of healthcare administrators increased 3,200 percent for the same time period.
Yes, that’s 3,200 percent in 35 years…the growing number of administrators is…driven by…ever-more-complex regulations. (To cite just a few industry-disrupting regulations, consider the Prospective Payment System of 1983; the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996; and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Act of 2009.) Critics say the army of administrators does little to relieve the documentation burden on clinicians, while creating layers of high-salaried bureaucratic bloat in healthcare organizations.
And here’s the chart that succinctly captures so much of what is wrong with America’s government-distorted healthcare regime.
By the way, the chart implies that the rising number of administrators is driven by additional regulations from Washington. I certainly won’t disagree with the notion that more red tape is counterproductive, but I suspect that third-party payer is the primary cause of the problem.
Third-party payer is what causes prices to climb, and then the government and insurance companies respond with various cost-control measures that require lots of paperwork and monitoring. Hence, more administrators.
In other words, third-party payer is the problem and regulations and administrators are both symptoms.
I’ll close by noting that I shared a version of this chart last year and warned that the numbers might be exaggerated. But there’s no question about the trend of more bureaucracy, red tape, and inefficiency.
P.S. Because it’s so important to fix the third-party payer problem, I’ve actually defended one small provision of Obamacare.
P.P.S. Here’s how genuine free markets result in lower costs for healthcare.
[…] not a fan of the government-distorted health system in the United […]
[…] not a fan of the government-distorted health system in the United […]
[…] The bottom line is that we get lower costs and greater efficiency when buyers and sellers directly interact without lots of interference from government. […]
[…] The bottom line is that we get lower costs and greater efficiency when buyers and sellers directly interact without lots of interference from government. […]
[…] In other words, our system of housing finance is mucked up by government intervention (very much akin to the way healthcare is a mess because of government). […]
[…] We’ll start with her idea to create a federal subsidy for rent payments. I wrote about this new handout last year, and warned that it would enrich landlords (much as tuition subsidies enrich colleges and health subsidies enrich providers). […]
“The bottom line is that the statists pushing these policies do not trust us with our own children. It’s not enough for them to have their hooks in them 180 days a year, feeding them propaganda from the first day of kindergarten through the end of high school. They now want access to them from the day they are born — and they will succeed if parents don’t rise up and tell the government nannies to back off.”
“Oregon Could Become the First State to Require In-Home Surveillance of Newborn Babies”
BY PAULA BOLYARD
https://pjmedia.com/trending/oregon-could-be-the-first-state-to-require-in-home-surveillance-of-newborn-babies/
[…] look at the flaws in the American health system. They blame capitalism when the problems of ever-higher prices and uneven coverage are the consequences of government […]
Reblogged this on Ace Health & Disabilty News.
Hello,nice share.
‘I tell them that they’re being too literal. That’s not how humor works.’
Scott Adams says 30% of the population does not have a sense of humour. Socialists are drawn from this 30%.
[…] [52]. https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2018/08/18/the-pernicious-impact-of-government-intervention-in… […]
[…] [12]. https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2018/08/18/the-pernicious-impact-of-government-intervention-in… […]
Ooops, Dan, I don’t think you peeedl back the root causes far enough. That’s not like you. Government regulations are not the symptom of third-party payment, they are the root cause of its very existence. (Define third-party as when your “health” “insurance” becomes “pre-paid medical care.” Even in perfect free-market-world, one would still want catastrophic medical insurance.)
Government as cause of third-party perversions include, but are not limited to: (1) Medicare and Medicaid are the ultimate and biggest third-party payers, and they are monopolists at that. (2) The foundation of the growth of pre-paid health care was the tax-free status of employer health insurance — the bedrock of over-consumption of health care because it was tax free and insulated the patient fro the cost. (3) Add to that the federal HMO act that required employers to offer a full-menu HMO along with any other more reasonable plans. (4) Then came HIPAA that added more requirements, (5) And along the way federal and state regulators added more than 1,000 “must haves” in any insurance plan, such that true catastrophic insurance became difficult or even impossible — examples include requirements to include chiropractic, routine check-ups (which even now require first-dollar coverage), some routine diagnostic tests (some of which are of doubtful value, and some that I may want are excluded), birth control, routine vaginal deliveries, and so on.(5) Certificates of need that protect hospital geographic monopolies on the one hand and create excess capacity (for which we pay) on the other…..
https://easyopinions.blogspot.com/2009/06/medicare-tomato-market.html#Blog1
06/21/09 – The Happy Hospitalist
Say that tomatoes were declared vital to life and made available free through the Medicare National Tomato Bank. This translates the story of the healthcare market to the tomato market. A long, readable, and informative post.
—
Government rules and controls are pervasive and detailed, both at the state and federal level. Health “insurance” as currently regulated is a general subsidy to healthcare, not insurance against catastrophic events. So, the costs of that subsidy are passed down in insurance premiums and grow to the level of (supposedly lower cost) subsidized use.
Reblogged this on THE SOVEREIGN PATIENT and commented:
As Dan Mitchell mentions in his post, much of the dysfunction we witness in healthcare are simply symptoms of the distortions that arise when we rely on a third-party payer system, with heavy government involvement, and all its perverse incentives which distort decision making for all participants. And so often the proposed “fixes” are aimed at mitigating symptoms caused by the third-party effect, rather than peeling back the layers to get to the root cause. Is it any wonder things aren’t improving despite billions and billions of subsidies, massive intervention, regulations and various forms of scrutiny!
The competition is between single payer insurance and third party payer insurance, both bad alternatives.
A free market alternative is not available, because the individual cannot absorb potential risks, and because the individual has to pay a premium rate for a service where he or she has no previous experience.
Here’s my take on Group Self-Insurance: