My favorite annual publication is the Fraser Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World, which measures the amount of economic liberty that exists in 159 nations. The rankings are based on five equally weighted categories, though I’ve always viewed “Legal System and Property Rights” as being the most important because even low taxes and light regulation won’t produce much growth if investors and entrepreneurs have no faith in the rule of law or the quality of governance.
This is why the annual International Property Rights Index is another one of my favorite publications. It provides a detailed look at why the right to own, utilize, and trade property is essential to a free society.
Property rights are accepted as a linchpin for human beings’ liberty, acting as a catalyst for economic and societal growth , and as a defense against authoritarian temptations. …Property is the basis of the freedom to contract, which is simply liberty in action. Without freedom to exchange, a third party, generally the government, intervenes through the political-bureaucratic ruling class. Freedom is more than the right to own property or the right to make transactions, to exchange, to buy and sell. Once citizens lose the right to own, they lose the ability to control their own lives. …This Index was developed to serve as a barometer of the state of property rights in all countries of the world.
Here’s the methodology of the Index. There are three main categories, each of which is comprised of several indices.
Now let’s get to the rankings.
As you might expect, Nordic nations and Anglosphere jurisdictions dominate, along with a smattering of other European countries.
…the top 15 countries for this year’s IPRI edition. Finland leads the 2018 IPRI (8.6924)… New Zealand ranks second (8.6322)… Next come Switzerland (8.6183), Norway (8.4504), Singapore (8.4049), Sweden (8.3970), Australia (8.3295), Netherlands (8.3252), Luxembourg (8.2978), Canada (8.2947), Japan (8.2315), Denmark (8.1640), United Kingdom (8.1413), United States of America (8.1243), and Austria (8.0050).
Congratulations to Finland, New Zealand, and Switzerland for winning the gold, silver, and bronze medals.
If you peruse the full rankings below, you’ll see that the United States is #14 (the same as last year).
Haiti is in last place, below even Venezuela.
It’s also worth noting that Chile is the highest-ranked Latin American nation.
Now let’s look at the nations with the biggest movement in the right direction and wrong direction. It’s easy to make a big jump for nations that are ranked very low, so Cyprus (which is now near the top of the 3rd quintile) probably deserves the most applause.
This year, five countries show the highest absolute improvement in their IPRI score: Azerbaijan (1.09), Ukraine (0.86), Russia (0.85), Moldova (0.82), and Cyprus (0.79); while the ones with highest decreases in their 2018 IPRI scores were South Africa (-0.65), Ethiopia (-0.3), Liberia (-0.27), Uganda (-0.25), and Uruguay (-0.22).
And South Africa’s decline is very tragic since it historically has been one of the best African nations.
By the way, if you want to know why property rights are so important, this chart is all the evidence you need.
And we’ll close today’s column with a bit of good news.
We don’t have decades of data, but the numbers that do exist show continuous improvement.
And since we also have evidence that overall global economic liberty is increasing, there are reasons for optimism.
[…] prove they’ve been vaccinated? From a libertarian perspective, guided by core principles such as property rights and freedom of association, that should be totally acceptable. And that’s true even if we think […]
[…] stated, I believe in property rights. The hospital should have the liberty to require vaccinations as a condition of employment and […]
[…] a libertarian perspective, guided by core principles such as property rights and freedom of association, that should be totally […]
[…] to have a big welfare state, but doesn’t want Finland’s very strong rule of law or robust property rights for people in the private sector. Nor does he want Finland’s 20 percent corporate tax […]
[…] stage how far the government will push this policy. But since the nation already has suffered the biggest year-over-year decline in the International Property Rights Index, any additional steps in the wrong direction would be […]
[…] And here are portions of what he wrote about socialism and property rights: […]
[…] And here are portions of what he wrote about socialism and property rights: […]
[…] And here are portions of what he wrote about socialism and property rights. […]
[…] we have the obvious result that property rights, rule of law, and other market-based policies are needed to help the […]
[…] we have the obvious result that property rights, rule of law, and other market-based policies are needed to help the […]
[…] Denmark also ranks above America in protecting the right of private […]
[…] foundation, good policies won’t generate much prosperity if the legal system is corrupt and property rights aren’t […]
Your methods are irreparably flawed in you have South Africa anywhere other than the bottom 20% and it calls into question this entire blog post. Given what’s happening there now. Yet you rank SA above nations like Poland and Italy? Furthermore, most Europeans, such as those in Italy, own their homes and have a higher average net worth than rent-slaves in Germany. Point being, property rights for average and poor people are respected more in most of the nations that do NOT make it into your top 20%. If taxes are high and the government seizes my family home from me I don’t consider that to be a nation that respects property rights at all.
[…] Denmark also ranks above America in protecting the right of private […]
[…] Denmark also ranks above America in protecting the right of private […]
[…] Denmark also ranks above America in protecting the right of private […]
[…] Denmark also ranks above America in protecting the right of private […]
[…] Denmark also ranks above America in protecting the right of private […]
Should intellectual property be considered property at all? What if B happens to come up with the same idea as A around the same time? Why is it justified to consider B as thief?
Also, it seems that upholding an IP protection such as patents actually limits freedom (of B), not enhances it.
Given the above, is it fair to say that the IPRI index would be more accurate if the IP related stuff were taken out of it?