I generally don’t chortle with joy when I read the Washington Post. This is the newspaper, after all, that often slants the news in ways that irk me.
- Deceptive reporting about Medicaid.
- Deceptive reporting about the budget.
- Deceptive reporting about Obamacare.
- Deceptive reporting about appropriations.
- Deceptive reporting about Germany.
Though maybe, in one or two instances, I should accuse the paper of sloppiness rather than dishonesty. Regardless, I still shake my head with disdain.
But not today. A recent story about corporate taxation brought a big smile to my face. Here are some passages that warmed my heart.
Taxes on corporations are plummeting across the globe… The average corporate tax rate globally has fallen by more than half
over the past three decades, from 49 percent in 1985 to 24 percent in 2018, the study found. …The international decline in corporate taxes threatens to drain governments of a source of funding for health care and other social welfare programs.
And here are some examples.
Republicans in Congress slashed the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. …the United States was joining a crowded party. In Japan and China, corporate tax rates have fallen by about a quarter since 2003. Rates are down about 30 percent over the same period across all of Europe, by 36 percent in Israel and by 27 percent in Canada. …Hungary…has lowered its corporate tax rate from 18 percent to 9 percent.
But I’m not happy simply because corporate tax rates are being reduced.
And I’m not smiling just because tax competition is pressuring politicians to do the right thing (though that does send a tingle up my leg).
I’m also overcome with schadenfreude because advocates of bad policy are chagrined by these developments.
“Corporate taxes are going to die in 10 to 20 years at this rate,” Ludvig Wier, an economist at the University of Copenhagen and a co-author of the study, said in an interview. “Without drastic collective action, you can see we’re nearing the end of it.” …academics say the falling tax rates…reflect a race to the bottom… The falling corporate tax rate represents a “collective action problem,” Wier argued, as each country has a strong incentive to lower its own tax rate, although when that is done the globe suffers.
I guess we know Mr. Wier’s perspective. There’s a “collective action problem” and “the globe suffers” because corporate tax rates are falling.
Perhaps he hasn’t read the substantial academic literature showing that lower rates are good for growth?
Fortunately, some academics are focused on measuring the real-world impact of policy changes. Professor Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato of Duke University crunched some numbers for the National Bureau of Economic Research and found that jobs and investment both decline when companies can’t protect their income from government.
…eliminating firms’ access to tax havens has unintended consequences for economic growth. We analyze a policy change that limited profit shifting for US multinationals, and show that the reform raised the effective cost
of investing in the US. Exposed firms respond by reducing global investment and shifting investment abroad – which lowered their domestic investment by 38% – and by reducing domestic employment by 1.0 million jobs. We then show that the costs of eliminating tax havens are persistent and geographically concentrated, as more exposed local labor markets experience declines in employment and income growth for over 15 years.
The moral of the story is that workers and investors benefit when money stays in the private sector.
This means pushing corporate tax rates as low as possible, while also allowing companies to utilize low-tax jurisdictions for their cross-border transactions.
That’s a win-win for the economy, and the angst on the left is a fringe benefit.
I’ll close with this chart I put together showing how the average corporate rate has decline in developed nations.
P.S. Individual rates also have declined since 1980, thanks if large part by the virtuous cycle of tax competition unleashed by Reagan and Thatcher. Sadly, the left has been somewhat successful in curtailing tax havens, and this has given politicians leeway to push tax rates higher in recent years.
[…] we see lower average tax rates and lower marginal tax rates for the three types of business financing on the […]
[…] A lower rate would be good for workers, consumers, and shareholders. […]
[…] A lower rate would be good for workers, consumers, and shareholders. […]
[…] A lower rate would be good for workers, consumers, and shareholders. […]
[…] I’ve been arguing against Biden’s proposed increase in business taxation by pointing out that higher corporate taxes will be bad news for workers, consumers, and shareholders. […]
[…] I’ve been arguing against Biden’s proposed increase in business taxation by pointing out that higher corporate taxes will be bad news for workers, consumers, and shareholders. […]
[…] big increase in the corporate tax rate. But since I’ve written about corporate tax rates over and over and over again, we’re going to approach this issue is a new […]
[…] big increase in the corporate tax rate. But since I’ve written about corporate tax rates over and over and over again, we’re going to approach this issue is a new […]
[…] increase in the corporate tax rate. But since I’ve written about corporate tax rates over and over and over again, we’re going to approach this issue is a new […]
[…] corporate tax burdens will be bad news for workers, consumers, and […]
The Thomas Sowell quotation applies to both sides, if we include cost to society in the cost asked about. And we should.
The difference in media often requires reading multiple sources. I wish a 300-page book that took a scholar a year to research and write could be absorbed in a 10-minute NPR segment or its transcript that took a few hours to put together, but it won’t be. I don’t mind some media’s reporters asking questions from Left or Right as long as they practice good journalism. The Wall Street Journal practices good journalism; the New York Post doesn’t; same big ownership.
Whether we benefit from business tax cuts depends partly on whether all essential needs of the society and its members are being met. If tax cuts increase revenue, that’s one way to meet those needs. But, especially if I’m right about the history of Congressional tax cuts, the skeptics are right to seek proof.
[…] what it’s worth, I think the lower corporate tax rate was the best provision of the 2017 reform, but McGinnis makes a strong […]
[…] corporate income tax rates will undermine U.S. […]
[…] just as the corporate income tax is really a tax on people (either as workers, consumers, or shareholders), the burden of trade taxes also falls on […]
[…] I applaud this big drop in tax rates. It’s been good for the world economy and good for workers. […]
[…] the study openly admits that tax competition plays a big […]
[…] « Falling Corporate Tax Rates Are Good News for the World’s Workers, Consumers, and Shareho… […]