Last week, I shared a graph showing that there are more guns than people in the United States, and I wrote that it was the “most enjoyable” chart of the year, mostly because it gets my leftist friends so agitated.
But I’m more likely to share gloomy visuals.
- The “most depressing” chart about Denmark, which shows a majority of the population lives off government.
- A “very depressing” chart about the United States, which shows how big business profits from cronyism.
- The “most depressing” chart about Japan, which shows that the tax burden has nearly doubled since 1965.
Now it’s time to add to that list. There’s a website called “Our World in Data,” which is a great resource if you’re a policy wonk who likes numbers. But some numbers are quite depressing.
For instance,if you peruse the “public spending” page, you’ll find a chart showing the dramatic expansion of redistribution spending as a share of economic output.
These numbers are very similar to the table I shared from Vito Tanzi back in 2013, which isn’t surprising since Professor Peter Lindert is the underlying source for both sets of data.
While the above chart is depressing to a libertarian, it’s nonetheless instructive because it confirms my argument that the western world became rich when government was very small and redistribution was tiny or even nonexistent.
For instance, nations in North America and Western Europe largely made the transition from agricultural poverty to middle-class prosperity during the “golden century” between the Napoleanic wars and World War I. And that was a period when redistribution spending basically didn’t exist and most nations didn’t even have income taxes (the U.S. didn’t make that mistake until 1913).
And even as recently as 1960, welfare states were very small compared to their current size. Indeed, redistribution spending in western nations averaged only about 10 percent of economic output, about half the size of today’s supposedly miserly American welfare state.
These points are important because some folks on the left misinterpret Wagner’s Law and actually try to argue that bigger government is good for growth.
P.S. South Korea has been a great success story for the past five decades, but that redistribution trendline is very worrisome.
P.P.S. The trendline for Greece helps to explain why that nation is bankrupt.
P.P.P.S. The chart shows that Canada is better than the United States, though that may not last since Canada’s current Prime Minister is seeking to undermine his nation’s competitive advantage.
P.P.P.P.S. While fiscal trends in the western world have been unfavorable, that bad news has been offset by positive trends for trade liberalization. Whether we see a big step backwards because of Trump remains to be seen.
[…] taxes drain huge amounts of money from people’s pockets and government budgets now divert immense amounts of money from the economy’s productive […]
[…] if you want to see more charts to confirm this data, click here, here, and […]
[…] if you want to see more charts to confirm this data, click here, here, and […]
[…] you believe in limited government and you’re looking back in time, this example or this exampleare good […]
[…] you believe in limited government and you’re looking back in time, this example or this example are good […]
[…] this was a period when there was no welfare state. Redistribution was virtually nonexistent. Not even in […]
[…] this was a period when there was no welfare state. Redistribution was virtually nonexistent. Not even in […]
[…] previously shared a version of this data, calling it the “world’s most depressing chart” – all of which was made possible by the imposition of income […]
[…] previously shared a version of this data, calling it the “world’s most depressing chart” – all of which was made possible by the imposition of income […]
[…] But total social welfare spending in Germany was less than 20 percent of GDP for the first few decades after World War II, considerably less than social welfare spending today in the United States. […]
[…] previously shared a version of this data, calling it the “world’s most depressing chart” – all of which was made possible by the imposition of income […]
[…] previously shared a version of this data, calling it the “world’s most depressing chart” – all of which was made possible by the imposition of income […]
[…] recently explained the evolution of taxation – and the unfortunate consequences of income taxation – to a seminar in the country of […]
[…] Wagner’s Law shows that politicians figure out how to extract more money and fund bigger government once nations become rich, but some people […]
[…] this was a period when there was no welfare state. Redistribution was virtually nonexistent. Not even in […]
[…] it enabled the modern welfare state. You can see from the chart that the explosion of redistribution spending only occurred after politicians obtained a new source […]
[…] it enabled the modern welfare state. You can see from the chart that the explosion of redistribution spending only occurred after politicians obtained a new source […]
[…] though that’s directly contrary to evidence on the factors that enabled North America and Western Europe to become […]
[…] this was a period when there was no welfare state. Redistribution was virtually nonexistent. Not even in […]
[…] stated, the relative success of those nations is due to free markets and a history of small government, but the imposition of big welfare states starting in the 1960s has weakened the region’s […]
One size fits all doe snot work in clothing or government. It is only appealing to lazy conference bound bureaucrats basing their prescription on faulty data, scientism, and their inner beliefs. This level of cognitive dissonance is just so plain and very painful to see.
[…] I also feel sorry for taxpayers, who are bearing ever-higher costs to finance redistribution […]
[…] First, it’s largely a legacy of the strong growth that occurred before welfare states were enacted. […]
[…] the era of unilateral free trade coincided with the imposition of the income tax (though it didn’t become a money machine for bigger government until the […]
[…] those nations at least enjoyed a lengthy period before World War II when government was very small. That’s when they became relatively […]
[…] If we want to solve the problems caused by the western world’s second-most-depressing chart, we’ll need to figure out how to reverse all the bad policies that produced the western world’s most-depressing chart. […]
[…] shared a version of this data back in June, asserting that the explosion of social welfare spending made this “the western […]
[…] shared a version of this data back in June, asserting that the explosion of social welfare spending made this “the western […]
[…] The western world’s most depressing graph. […]
[…] week, I shared very grim data, going all the way back to 1880, on the growth of the welfare […]
Daniel, Keep them coming! Too bad it’s impossible for anyone to count illegal border crossings. How about the number of school kids on the Fed’s year ‘round free breakfast and lunch programs for kindergarten thru age 19? Very popular in California’s Central Valley.
Once upon a time, total world annual growth was small, and the western world with average growth rates of a couple of percent was easily outperforming world averages — and thus rose to the top of the worldwide prosperity ranks.
Now the situation has reversed. Average annual world growth rates (real growth, excluding inflation) are trendlining around four percent with a clear long term accelerating trend. So, not only is the growth exponential– but the exponent itself seems to be growing. By contrast, western world democracies (especially the Bernie Sanders type — which is America’s future) are stuck at one to two percent growth trendlines. An arithmetically deterministic trajectory to decline.
You can play around a bit with the numbers but the basic story remains the same. So long as western world voter-lemmings cannot resist the temptation to vote themselves goodies from the common government pot, the relative erosion of the western world’s once top prosperity ranking will continue. On this trajectory, most of the countries in the chart will be middle income countries by the much higher worldwide standards of the upcoming mid-century.
To prove my point, look at a major German publication lamenting China.
http://m.spiegel.de/international/business/chinese-economic-expansion-has-germany-worried-a-1209325.html
http://m.spiegel.de/international/business/chinese-economic-expansion-has-germany-worried-a-1209325-2.html
They view it as a calamity, an unfair strategic game. They don’t get it. They are a major publication feeding the German people ideology and intellect and they don’t get that it is all a manifestation of European decline. All a manifestation of the simple arithmetic of China growing at six percent and Europe growing at a quarter of that speed.
It’s not the lack of centralization dear Spiegel, it’s the flat effort-reward curve environment that you Europeans themselves have created in your countries. So long as Europe’s growth rate remains four to five percentage points slower than China’s there is nothing that can be done about it. Absolutely nothing.
“Strategic” handling of the situation with barriers, legislation, centralization and “deals”, will only slow down European growth further (Chinese growth too but not nearly to the same extent) and actually hasten Europe’s decline on the world stage. Even the much touted pressure for China to open its borders will only make China grow even faster. That would be a good thing for humanity overall, but will do very little in terms of a fast growing nation overtaking a much slower growing one.
The only thing Europeans can do is augment their own structural growth rate by liberating themselves from the self-created flatter effort-reward curves that their self-made welfare state created. How likely is that to happen? …Exactly. So the future world order will continue its inexorable march. European citizens will be middle income country residents by mid-century. And that is coming up soon.
The same holds for the US whose “now enlightened” citizens are following Europe, albeit with some delay. The epitome of decline.
The only way to prosper is to have a structural growth rate that is higher than the world average. Anything less represents decline by the elemental irrevocable arithmetic of compounding numbers — no matter how many intellectual arguments a culture makes about why it should be this or that way.
With a growth rate below world average it will all get washed down the toilet. This is an unprecedented era of human growth, not ever seen since the beginning of history — and accelerating further. Not only is human capability rising exponentially, but the exponent itself is rising. World changes that used to take centuries will now conclude in a few short decades — and accelerating.
Those who take American continued prosperity leadership in the world based on historical momentum are delusional.
PS. Some even see China as a model whereby more statism brings more growth. They don’t understand that China is growing at six percent (I know the figure is debatable but it is high nonetheless) because it went from the virtually zero freedom of communism to a semi-free imposed capitalism/fascism. Sure, if they fail to further liberalize their economy growth will eventually stall. But for now they are fast moving towards their new equilibrium point of: middle-freedom begets middle level prosperity. And they still have some way to go before they saturate at middle prosperity. But middle prosperity for countries like China and India will already correspond to economies that are larger than Europe and the US combined. Hence western civilization and its citizens will be pushed aside to the margin.
One final point. Freedom is often relative and misinterpreted. According to some metrics China may already be freer than, say, France. Yes, in France you can say what you want and you can demonstrate in the streets every weekend, even naked. But day in day out the French people directly and indirectly harvest sixty percent of your vitality for common endeavors. How free can you be when sixty percent of your productive time you are forced to work for distant unknowns?
If the voter-lemmings of the western world insist in this type of unmotivated economic (in)efficiency then their democracies will end — one way or another. Freedom is utilitarian in the end. With a structural growth rate that is less than half the world average nothing is sustainable– nothing. It all goes down the drain of decline.
Sorry for the long post, but this is the pivotal world transformation that is unfolding in our times.
The Public Spending chart would be more honest if it was normalized to population size. Most european countries are stagnant as regards population size. I think if controlled for population size, the USA might look better than Canada.
Hi,
I love your newsletters but I wanted to inform you that Lithuania just passed a progressive tax rate.
The article itself is in Lithuanian since the law was only passed today and it will go in effect next year. (You might have to wait or use Google Translate, in essence the top rate becomes 27%)
Also, I think that Latvia has already a progressive income tax rate.
So Estonia is the only baltic country left with a flat tax. 😦
https://www.vz.lt/verslo-aplinka/2018/06/28/seimas-galutinai-palaimino-mokesciu-reforma
https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2017/12/tnf-latvia-tax-changes-2018.html
Regards, Matas
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018, 08:32 International Liberty wrote:
> Dan Mitchell posted: “Last week, I shared a graph showing that there are > more guns than people in the United States, and I wrote that it was the > “most enjoyable” chart of the year, mostly because it gets my leftist > friends so agitated. But I’m more likely to share gloomy vi” >