Senator Bernie Sanders wants to dramatically increase the burden of government and he claims that his policies won’t lead to economic misery because nations such as Sweden show that you can be a prosperous country with a big welfare state.
Perhaps, but there are degrees of prosperity. And a large public sector imposes a non-trivial burden on Nordic nations, resulting in living standards that lag U.S. levels according to OECD data.
Moreover, according to research by a Swedish economist, people of Scandinavian descent in America produce and earn much more than their counterparts at home.
That’s not exactly a ringing endorsement of the Nordic Model.
But there actually are some things we can learn from places such as Sweden. And not just things to avoid.
As Johan Norberg explains in this short video (you may have to double-click and watch it on the YouTube site), there are some very good policies in his home country. Indeed, in some ways, his nation is more free market than America.
I especially like Johan’s explanation about how Sweden became a rich country before the welfare state was adopted.
And he’s right that Sweden had a smaller government and a lower tax burden than the United States for a long period.
Indeed, there was very little income redistribution until the 1960s.
But once the welfare state was adopted, the Swedes went crazy and dramatically increased tax rates and the burden of government spending. And, as Johan explained, that’s when Sweden’s relative prosperity began to drop.
And big government eventually led to an economic crisis in the early 1990s, which has sobered up Swedish officials and policy in recent decades has been moving in the right direction.
Including significant reductions in the budget and lower tax rates (though the fiscal burden is still far too high).
I particularly like Johan’s advice to copy what works. We should partially privatize our Social Security system (actually, we should be like Australia and have full privatization, but we should at least get the ball rolling). And we should have extensive school choice like Sweden. Moreover, let’s copy the Swedes and get rid of the death tax.
Sweden is actually a very pro-market country, albeit one that is weighed down by a large welfare state and excessive taxation. Interestingly, if you look at the non-fiscal policy variables from Economic Freedom of the World, Sweden actually ranks much higher than the United States (along with many other Nordic nations).
The bottom line is that Sweden actually is somewhat like the United States. There are some very bad policies and some fairly decent policies. America ranks above Sweden in a couple of areas, but lags in other areas. The net result is that we’re both more market-oriented than the average western nation (compare Sweden and Greece, for instance), but both well behind the pace setters for economic liberty, Hong Kong and Singapore.
For more information on this topic, here’s a video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity that features another Swede explaining what works and doesn’t work in her country.
P.S. Denmark is a lot like Sweden. A crushing tax burden and extravagant welfare state, but also hyper-free market policies in other areas (and maybe some fiscal progress if Denmark continues to follow the Golden Rule).
[…] nothing else, it’s remarkable that the nation Bernie Sanders praised for socialism (albeit incorrectly) is now the poster child for (some) […]
[…] Drugim riječima, posljednjih dvadesetak godina Švedska je bila lider u pro-tržišnim reformama. […]
[…] other words, for the past twenty or so years, Sweden has been a leader in pro-market […]
[…] usually point to Sweden or Denmark, but I point out that Sweden and Denmark became rich in the 1800s and early 1900s when government was very […]
[…] usually point to Sweden or Denmark, but I point out that Sweden and Denmark became rich in the 1800s and early 1900s when government was very […]
[…] usually point to Sweden or Denmark, but I point out that Sweden and Denmark became rich in the 1800s and early 1900s when government was very […]
[…] usually point to Sweden or Denmark, but I point out that Sweden and Denmark became rich in the 1800s and early 1900s, when government was very […]
[…] você quiser comparações mais palpáveis envolvendo umas das nações europeias de maior sucesso , considere essa tabela que mostra a prosperidade relativa de diferentes níveis salariais […]
[…] concreto, nunca tienen una respuesta apropiada, ya que Suecia (su respuesta refleja) se hizo rica cuando el gobierno era pequeño y ha ido dando tumbos desde que se impuso un gran estado del […]
[…] over the past decade. Many Eastern European nations boosted their scores by a modest degree, and Sweden also deserves a special […]
[…] be more specific, they never have an accurate answer since Sweden (their reflex response) became rich when government was small and has stumbled ever since a large welfare state was […]
[…] to be more specific, they never have an accurate answer since Sweden (their reflex response) became rich when government was small and has stumbled ever since a large welfare state was […]
[…] to be more specific, they never have an accurate answer since Sweden (their reflex response) became rich when government was small and has stumbled ever since a large welfare state was […]
[…] P.S. Pension reform is just the tip of the iceberg. As I wrote two years ago, Sweden has implemented a wide range of pro-market reforms over the past few decades, including some very impressive spending restraint in the 1990s. If you’re interested in more information about these changes, check out Lotta Moberg’s video and Johan Norberg’s video. […]
[…] real lesson to learn from […]
[…] P.P.P.S. If you’re interested in more information about market-oriented reforms in Sweden, check out Lotta Moberg’s video and Johan Norberg’s video. […]
[…] way above its weight in debates about economic policy. Leftists all over the world (most recently, Bernie Sanders) say the Nordic nation is an example that proves a big welfare state can exist in a rich nation. […]
[…] way above its weight in debates about economic policy. Leftists all over the world (most recently, Bernie Sanders) say the Nordic nation is an example that proves a big welfare state can exist in a rich nation. […]
[…] recent years, Nordic nations have sought to undo the damage of big government with pro-market reforms and limits on the fiscal burden of […]
[…] I’m guessing Comrade Bernie would inaccurately claim Sweden orDenmark, even those two nations got rich first and then adopted big […]
[…] I’m guessing Comrade Bernie would inaccurately claim Sweden or Denmark, even those two nations got rich first and then adopted big […]
[…] Only Sweden isn’t in this top category, and even that nation is ranked 42 and is mostly free. […]
[…] point to Sweden and Denmark and you’ll have a hard time educating them that those countries became successful when government was small and that they’ve been falling behind ever since big welfare states were […]
[…] bluster about “fairness.” And a few of them think Sweden is an acceptable answer until I point out that it became rich when government was small but began to lose ground once a large welfare state […]
[…] if you want a more apples-to-apples comparison involving one of the most successful European nations, consider this chart showing the relative prosperity of different income levels in the United […]
it is becoming increasingly evident that the Bern’s policy ideas are not workable… he lacks the capacity to deliver the goodies to America’s gullible teeny-boppers… the numbers don’t add up… what’s most distressing… is the extent to which he has been able to sell this nonsensical socialist drivel… to adult Americans…
Sweden is the rape capital of Europe… it is being inundated with street beggars… pedophiles… petty criminals migrants and murders… there is a critical housing shortage… the traditional work ethic and tenacity of the Swedish people is fading… as their culture is being absorbed by a larger less productive human mass… Europe’s brand of socialism is in decline…… as it’s productivity fades… and joblessness increases… it’s influence on and participation in regional and world economies will decline… the ripple effect will be… unpleasant…
as sure as overwhelming military force subdues alien societies… multiculturalism will force the weaker culture into submission and ultimately… oblivion… few are willing to examine these realities and admit to the ultimate consequences and failures of modern socialization when coupled with the evils of cultural Marxism… unintended consequences rum amuck…
yet another sad story…………..
[…] via Sweden Isn’t a Good Role Model for Bernie Sanders — International Liberty […]
Hello.
One should take mr norbergs opinions with some skepsis. The man is a multiculturalist who argues that if we abolish borders, checks and controls of who goes where, all will be well. In sweden only the most vulgar and delusional liberals (classical definition, not current day american) and libertarians given any thought.
I would recommend Tino and Nima Sanandaji, a pair of swedish economists of kurdish heritage, and Joakim Ruist. These three lack the overt political agenda of Norberg. Instead they apply a scientific approach rather than Norberg’s naïve utopian and culturally ignorant demagogouery.
Greetings from Sweden,
Rikard, teacher
Reblogged this on Aquilon's Eyrie.
Reblogged this on Scoop Feed.