For those of us worried (with good reason!) about excessive regulation and red tape, 2015 was not a good year.
As you can see from the headline of this story in the Washington Examiner, federal bureaucrats were very busy imposing new mandates and restrictions on the economy. Indeed, President Obama now has the cumulative record for red tape.
That’s obviously good news for compliance bureaucrats, lawyers, and others who get fat and happy because of the regulatory state. But it can’t be good for growth and competitiveness to have all that sand thrown into the gears of the economy.
And to put the numbers in context, here’s a chart from the folks at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. On the left side, it shows the biggest red-tape year for every President before Obama. And then on the right side, it shows how Obama is consistently meeting or exceeding prior records.
All this bad news might be somewhat bearable if there was some reason to think we were turning a corner and that the worst was behind us.
Unfortunately, that’s not the case. Let’s now share another headline, this time from a report in The Hill.
The bottom line is that the Obama Administration is openly excited about the prospect of building upon the President’s dubious red-tape record.
Though I guess we shouldn’t be surprised. If you read the story, you’ll see that next year will be a perfect storm of pro-regulation bureaucrats being egged on by Obama’s regulatory appointees who see 2016 as their last chance to impose additional red tape on the economy’s productive sector.
But the private sector will become less dynamic as we become more like Greece. Here are some very depressing bits of information I’ve shared in the past.
- Americans spend 8.8 billion hours every year filling out government forms.
- The economy-wide cost of regulation is now $1.75 trillion.
- For every bureaucrat at a regulatory agency, 100 jobs are destroyed in the economy’s productive sector.
- A World Bank study determined that moving from heavy regulation to light regulation “can increase a country’s average annual GDP per capita growth by 2.3 percentage points.”
P.S. While the regulatory burden in the United States is stifling, I think Greece and Japan win the record if you want to identify the most absurd specific examples of red tape.
P.P.S. Though I suspect America wins the prize for worst regulatory agency and most despicable regulatory practice.
P.P.P.S. Here’s what would happen if Noah tried to comply with today’s level of red tape when building an ark.
P.P.P.P.S. Just in case you think regulation is “merely” a cost imposed on businesses, don’t forget that bureaucratic red tape is the reason we’re now forced to use inferior light bulbs, substandard toilets, second-rate dishwashers, and inadequate washing machines.
[…] I would point out that President Reagan was the exception to this dismal […]
[…] I would point out that President Reagan was the exception to this dismal […]
[…] But these good things weren’t random. They happened because Reagan made big positive changes in policy. He tamed inflation. He slashed tax rates. He substantially reduced the burden of domestic spending. He curtailed red tape. […]
[…] But these good things weren’t random. They happened because Reagan made big positive changes in policy. He tamed inflation. He slashed tax rates. He substantially reduced the burden of domestic spending. He curtailed red tape. […]
[…] already opined on the record levels of red tape emanating from Washington, but it’s getting even worse in the […]
[…] already opined on the record levels of red tape emanating from Washington, but it’s getting even worse in […]
[…] most depressing data about America’s economy is not the top tax rate, the regulatory burden, or the level of wasteful of government […]
[…] most depressing data about America’s economy is not the top tax rate, the regulatory burden, or the level of wasteful of government […]
[…] By the way, while I think Pethokoukis shared some worthwhile charts, I would have augmented his list with charts on the rising burden of government spending, the tax code’s discrimination against income that is saved and invested, declining labor-force participation, changes in economic freedom, and the ever-expanding regulatory burden. […]
[…] By the way, while I think Pethokoukis shared some worthwhile charts, I would have augmented his list with charts on the rising burden of government spending, the tax code’s discrimination against income that is saved and invested, declining labor-force participation, changes in economic freedom, and the ever-expanding regulatory burden. […]
[…] This is why I want pro-growth tax reform, a smaller government, and less suffocating red tape. […]
[…] The Regulatory State Grew to Record Levels in 2015, and the Red-Tape Burden Will Get even Worse in … […]
Most regulatory/compliance issues relate to the tax code and welfare. You cannot replace the tax code with a flat tax without adding progressivity through either a standard deduction or a prebate. You cannot get rid of welfare without substituting an alternative like a basic income/substantial prebate.
By combining a flat tax with a prebate [100% of the poverty level] that cannot be lost based on income levels, you could eliminate half of the current compliance problem along with 1,000,000 federal bureaucrats and their regulatory requirements. This would cost no more than we are currently paying. And, it would change a dependent society into one where individuals become responsible for their own welfare.
However, because “a flat tax” is a negative trigger for the left and a “basic income” is a negative trigger for the right; this common sense approach cannot get off the ground.
Government is configured to expand. Because of interest group politics, cuts to welfare or entitlements will not happen without dramatic change. Alternatives that assume we can stop this momentum are like the economist on a desert island trying to open a can of food, by assuming a can opener.
“There is one problem with this: The FAA is acting contrary to a law that Congress passed in 2012, which prevents the FAA from doing what it has now done by proactively banning it from regulating model aircraft—including drones when they are used for recreational or hobby purposes.
Section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 states:
“Notwithstanding any other provision of law relating to the incorporation of unmanned aircraft systems in Federal Aviation Administration plans and policies, including this subtitle, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may not promulgate any rule or regulation regarding a model aircraft, or an aircraft being developed as a model aircraft[.]”
federal agencies gone rogue? defying congress?
happy new year………………………………………….
” As of Dec. 21, failing to register a drone that weighs more than 0.55 pounds—roughly the weight of two sticks of butter—can land you in jail for up to three years and subject you to $27,500 in civil penalties and $250,000 in criminal fines.”
“A Drone for Christmas Could Land You in Jail”
Jason Snead
http://www.nationalinterest.org/blog/drone-christmas-could-land-you-jail-14657