No other nation in the world spends as much on education as the United States.
According to our leftist friends, who prefer to measure inputs rather than outputs, this is a cause for celebration. I guess it shows we have the best intentions. Or maybe we love our kids the most.
For those who prefer to focus on outputs, however, it’s very difficult to be happy about the results we’re getting compared to all the money that’s being spent. Heck, in some cases it’s almost as if we’re getting negative results when you compare inputs and outputs.
To paraphrase what Winston Churchill said about the Royal Air Force in World War II, never have so many paid so much to achieve so little.
Now we have more evidence that American taxpayers are paying a lot and getting a little (though I have to admit that non-teaching education bureaucrats have been big winners).
The Washington Post reports on some new research to see how America’s young adults rank compared to their peers in other nations.
The results aren’t encouraging.
This exam, given in 23 countries, assessed the thinking abilities and workplace skills of adults. It focused on literacy, math and technological problem-solving. The goal was to figure out how prepared people are to work in a complex, modern society. And U.S. millennials performed horribly. That might even be an understatement… No matter how you sliced the data – by class, by race, by education – young Americans were laggards compared to their international peers. In every subject, U.S. millennials ranked at the bottom or very close to it, according to a new study by testing company ETS.
There were three testing categories and Americans didn’t do well in any of them.
…in literacy, U.S. millennials scored higher than only three countries. In math, Americans ranked last. In technical problem-saving, they were second from the bottom. “Abysmal,” noted ETS researcher Madeline Goodman. “There was just no place where we performed well.”
Here’s the comparative data on literacy.
Here’s how Americans did on numeracy (which may explain why there’s considerable support for the minimum wage).
Last but not least, millennials didn’t exactly do well in problem solving, either (which may explain their bizarre answers to polling questions).
By the way, the researchers also sliced and diced the data to get apples-to-apples comparisons.
Yet even on this basis, there’s no good news for America.
U.S. millennials with master’s degrees and doctorates did better than their peers in only three countries, Ireland, Poland and Spain. …Top-scoring U.S. millennials – the 90th percentile on the PIAAC test – were at the bottom internationally, ranking higher only than their peers in Spain. …ETS researchers tried looking for signs of promise – especially in math skills, which they considered a good sign of labor market success. They singled out native-born Americans. Nope.
At some point, we need to realize that decades of additional spending and decades of further centralization have not worked.
Maybe, just maybe, it’s time to shut down the Department of Education on the federal level and to encourage school choice on the state and local level.
After all, we already have good evidence that decentralization and competition produces better test scores. There’s also strong evidence for school choice from nations such as Sweden, Chile, and the Netherlands.
P.S. We’re never going to solve this problem by tinkering with the status quo. That’s like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. This is why Bush’s no-bureaucrat-left-behind scheme didn’t work. And it explains why Obama’s Common Core is flopping as well.
P.P.S. Moreover, it will probably require big reform to deal with the brainless types of political correctness that exist in government schools.
P.P.P.S. If you want more evidence that the problem isn’t money, check out this research on educational outcomes in various cities. Or look at this data from New York City and Washington, DC, both of which spend record amounts of money on education.
P.P.P.P.S. I can’t resist sharing this correction of some very shoddy education reporting by the New York Times.
P.P.P.P.P.S. On the bright side, the inadequacies of government-run schools helped give birth to the home-schooling movement, which then led to this humorous video. And the political correctness that infects government schools results in a bizarre infatuation with gender performance, which helped lead to this funny video. And this bit of satire on the evolution of math training in government schools also is quite amusing.
[…] was commenting on America’s governmentschools instead of the Royal Air Force, he would have said, “never have so many paid so much to achieve so […]
[…] That’s because American taxpayers have been dumping ever-larger amounts of money into government schools and getting consistently dismal outcomes. […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more expensive while produced ever-more dismal […]
[…] was commenting on America’s governmentschools instead of the Royal Air Force, he would have said, “never have so many paid so much to achieve so […]
[…] was commenting on America’s governmentschools instead of the Royal Air Force, he would have said, “never have so many paid so much to achieve so […]
[…] of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more expensive while produced ever-more dismal […]
[…] was commenting on America’s governmentschools instead of the Royal Air Force, he would have said, “never have so many paid so much to achieve so […]
[…] Churchill was commenting on America’s government schools instead of the Royal Air Force, he would have said, “never have so many paid so much to achieve so […]
[…] A much better deal for taxpayers. […]
[…] much better deal for […]
[…] is that taxpayers are being asked to cough up ever-growing amounts of cash. Yet we never see any improvements in the quality of government […]
[…] is that taxpayers are being asked to cough up ever-growing amounts of cash. Yet we never see any improvements in the quality of government […]
[…] obvious, the solution is not dumping more money into government-run schools. We’ve tried that and tried that and tried that, over and over again, and it never […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] obvious, the solution is not dumping more money into government-run schools. We’ve tried that and tried that and tried that, over and over again, and it never […]
[…] the solution is not dumping more money into government-run schools. We’ve tried that and tried that and tried that, over and over again, and it never […]
[…] is that taxpayers are being asked to cough up ever-growing amounts of cash. Yet we never see any improvements in the quality of government […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] more-recent data from Mark Perry shows that inflation-adjusted spending has ballooned in recent decades, driven in part by teacher expenses but even more so by the cost of […]
[…] of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more expensive while produced ever-more dismal […]
[…] the benefits of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more expensive while produced ever-more dismal […]
[…] paraphrase Winston Churchill, never have so many taxpayers paid so much money into a system that produced such mediocre results […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] is that taxpayers are being asked to cough up ever-growing amounts of cash. Yet we never see any improvements in the quality of government […]
[…] immediate reaction, given the wealth of evidence, was to scoff at the discredited notion that more spending is a key to better educational […]
[…] unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into […]
[…] is that taxpayers are being asked to cough up ever-growing amounts of cash. Yet we never see any improvements in the quality of government […]
[…] the interests of teacher unions and school bureaucrats. Which is why more money and more money and more money and more money and more money (you get the point) never translates into better […]
[…] conclusion is that taxpayers are being asked to cough up ever-growing amounts of cash. Yet we never see any improvements in the quality of government […]
[…] But I suspect the only effective answer is busting up a hopelessly bad government school monopoly. […]
[…] The sad news is that the United States has the ignoble distinction of having the highest level of per-student spending. Yet we certainly don’t get better results. […]
[…] For what it’s worth, the final few sentences in the above excerpt should be main issue being discussed in state capitals. Lawmakers should be asking why more and more money never produces better outcomes. […]
[…] It’s especially depressing when you compare the United States with other developed nations. We spend more than other countries, on a per-student basis, yet our test scores are below average. […]
Is this not completely obvious?
[…] of socialism in the United States. Education is probably the biggest sector of our economy that is dominated by government. The air traffic control system is another unfortunate […]
[…] America’s Government School System: Never Have so Many Paid so Much to Achieve so Little […]
[…] of socialism in the United States. Education is probably the biggest sector of our economy that is dominated by government. The air traffic control system is another unfortunate […]
[…] of socialism in the United States. Education is probably the biggest sector of our economy that is dominated by government. The air traffic control system is another unfortunate […]
School Choice is the way to help inner city kids the most!!!
[…] America’s Government School System: Never Have so Many Paid so Much to Achieve so Little […]
[…] P.S. On the issue of government schools, I suppose we can paraphrase Winston Churchill and note that never have so many paid so much to achieve so little. […]
[…] I’ve written many times about the shortcomings of government schools at the K-12 level. We spend more on our kids than any other nation, yet our test scores are comparatively dismal. […]
[…] I’ve written many times about the shortcomings of government schools at the K-12 level. We spend more on our kids than any other nation, yet our test scores are comparatively dismal. […]
[…] znanja”, i kao neke pozitivne eksternalije su tu i bla bla… samo ga uputite ovdje i pokažite mu ovu […]
If I had school-aged children, I would be living with them abroad for their pre-college years. For their first degree, the only acceptable school in the USA is HiIlsdale College. While I had good educational experiences attending multiple colleges and grad schools, two simultaneously at both levels, it was the student not the schools that excelled.
A person who cannot write is not educated no matter how many years of school nor how many classes taken. Take that to computer class and repeat generously.
When a teenager the occasional sci-fi movie would posit a society where no one knew anything and it was machine dependent for survival. I could not accept that as a plausible reality; now with the PC Maoist pro(re)gressive faux-liberal Democrats in charge, I see it is reality.
The Founders must be seething in their graves. I am above ground but solidly with Jefferson:
“Shays’ Rebellion — a sometimes-violent uprising of farmers angry over conditions in Massachusetts in 1786 — prompted Thomas Jefferson to express the view that “a little rebellion now and then is a good thing” for America. Unlike other leaders of The Republic, Jefferson felt that the people had a right to express their grievances against the government, even if those grievances might take the form of violent action.” God bless Ferguson and Americans discontent.
Let the second civil war begin … “In God we Trust”; for the government it’s “In the Obamanation we tryst [sic]”. That’s as close to god as the Federal government gets. ©2015
Hey, blogged about this at Libertopia Cartoons (also have a fun, unique cartoon on Government Spending that we created to go along with the post). We love the articles you write here, and really liked this post as it’s an issue that every community deals with continually. This seems like a great subject to dialogue with friends and neighbors about, and perhaps introduce a different way of thinking. You can find the link to the cartoon here: https://libertopiacartoon.wordpress.com/2015/03/22/the-high-cost-of-government-education/
[…] American’s Government School System: Never have so many paid so much to achieve so little […]
down the road a few miles is an Amish school… it is a modest building with one large classroom and a vestibule… the building is on a large playground… with two outhouses… one for boys… one for girls… in the summer… goats graze on the grounds to keep it tidy… here… Amish kids learn to read… write… and do math… ..their skill set… work ethic… and the academic skills taught in this little school prepare them to be successful in life… many of these young people will go on to become millionaires as they acquire land and build their families…
in contrast… the local factory school is not doing so well… in reality graduates are prepared for little else than remedial community college coursework… {to be paid for by the taxpayer}… and that… after over 12 years of public education… graduates are ill prepared for the workplace… -they can’t make change-… but many of them are learning to cook meth… and looking forward to their first tat….
it seems nice buildings… with fine sports facilities… swimming pools… free lunches {breakfasts as well}… just are not getting the kids ready to lead a productive successful life in our society… perhaps more money for gilded bureaucrats and inspired educators will do the trick…
oh… and more testing… lots of testing…………
When my kids were in school, the people who ran the schools were always introducing flakey, silly ideas into the system. They’d regularly explain that we need “bold new ideas” to improve education. No, we don’t. If you were talking about how to make better computers, well, computers today are faster and more reliable and cheaper than ever, so to make them better still requires bold new ideas. But education in the U.S. was better 50 or 100 years ago than it is today. We don’t need bold new ideas. We just need to go back to the ideas that worked and abandon the ideas that have proven to not work.
Reblogged this on westfargomusings and commented:
We need to quit teaching to the lowest common denominator and get those low kids into alternate schooling programs again so the rest of the nation can have a chance.
back when I was in school (oh so many decades ago) ND usually ranked near the top in standardized testing results yet was near the bottom of education spending per pupil. There were districts that paid so little to new school teachers that if they were single and had a kid, or were a married couple both teaching and had a kid they qualified for food stamps. Our spending has increased quite a bit, but as we’ve lost local control over our classrooms our test results have been dropping.
Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma.
[…] WAIT, THERE’S MORE… […]
[…] By Dan Mitchell […]