While immigration is a very contentious issue for the politicians in Washington, there’s actually some level of agreement among people in the real world.
Almost everybody agrees that it would be foolish and short-sighted not to allow some immigration, particularly from young, educated people with valuable skills.
Similarly, there is widespread agreement that you can’t have completely open borders, particularly for those who are unlikely to be net contributors to the economy.
So the real debate (and this is where there is a lot of room for disagreement) is who gets to come to America and under what conditions.
I don’t raise this issue because I have any wise words – much less proposed solutions – on the overall issue of immigration.
Instead, let’s look at the profoundly perverse way that the federal government is using the refugee program to expand the problem of dependency.
Here are some excerpts from a disturbing story in the Washington Times.
The State Department has helped to relocate tens of thousands of refugees from the war-torn African nation of Somalia to Minnesota, where they can take advantage of some of America’s most generous welfare and charity programs. …Most of Minnesota’s Somali population started off as legal refugees through a program administered by the U.S. State Department through the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration. Minnesota was selected among the nation’s states for relocation primarily because of its robust entitlement offerings.
Gee, isn’t that wonderful. We’re bringing people into the country and settling them where they can get the largest amount of handouts.
And apparently that’s Minnesota, the France of America.
“Minnesota is exceptional in many ways but it’s the closest thing in the United States to a true social democratic state,” said Ahmed Samatar, a professor of international studies at Macalester College, in St. Paul. “That translates into the way Somali refugees have been received here they’ve been given a secure environment, housing, education, health care, perhaps even some minimum income to sustain them until they can stand on their own feet. That’s all provided by Minnesota,” said Mr. Samatar, who has tracked the State Department’s refugee program. Outside Alaska, Minnesota spends more per low-income person on public welfare than any other state in the U.S., according to a report by the Center for the American Experiment, a think tank located in Minneapolis. The report found Minnesota outspent its average peer state in welfare subsidies by nearly $4,000.
Oh, just in case you’re thinking that maybe the situation isn’t so bad because at least private charities are involved, it turns out that those organizations are simply contractors for the government.
…the…charitable organizations operating within the state with which the State Department contracts …In addition to its generous welfare subsidies, Minnesota also has a number of charitable organizations that contract with the State Department like Lutheran Social Services, Catholic Charities, and World Relief Minnesota.
In other words, taxpayers are getting hit twice, once for official welfare payments and once for coerced “charity” laundered through groups jostling for space at the public trough.
At this point, you may be wondering whether all this spending is having a desirable effect?
As taxpayers, are we getting value for our money?
Yes, but only if you define dependency and unemployment as valuable.
Even though Minnesota has a good job market, that doesn’t seem to have translated into jobs for the Somali refugees. Minnesota’s state demographer’s office reports that only 41 percent of Somali men are working and 54 percent of Somali women are employed, meaning many may rely on the state’s handouts to survive, and are more susceptible to extremists pull. “It seems safe to assume that if they’re not working, then they’re likely receiving public welfare benefits,” said Peter Nelson, director of public policy at the Center of the American Experiment.
Amazingly, the left-wing governor of the state has doubled down on failure, expanding handouts.
Gov. Mark Dayton has expanded the state’s entitlement programs, although he remains mum on the state’s expense at doing so.
Though, to be fair, maybe he doesn’t care because Uncle Sam is the sugar daddy, picking up a big part of the tab.
“The state of Minnesota receives funding through the federal Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Refugee Resettlement to promote the successful resettlement and integration of refugees in Minnesota,” said a spokeswoman at the state’s Department of Human Services. …Minnesotans have also welcomed them onto their entitlement rolls, with the state’s cash assistance and food stamp programs, skyrocketing in recent years. The number of Somali adults and children who participated in the Minnesota’s family cash assistance program jumped 34 percent from 2008 to 2013, according to the state’s statistics. Likewise, Minnesota’s food assistance participation increased 98 percent, to 17,300 adults and children, which does not include U.S.-born Somalis, in the same timeframe.
At this point, you’re probably very upset. At least if you’re a taxpayer.
After all, haven’t we learned from painful experience that redistribution subsidizes poverty?
But I’ve saved the “best” for last.
…the effort is having the unintended consequence of creating an enclave of immigrants with high unemployment that is both stressing the state’s safety net and creating a rich pool of potential recruiting targets for Islamist terror groups. This population is…being targeted by Islamist terror organizations like the Islamic State and al-Shabab, a Somalia-based group with links to al Qaeda, according to U.S. officials. Among Minnesota-based Somali-Americans, American converts to Islam or Somali refugees, there have been numerous convictions for various levels of collaboration with Islamist terror groups, plus reports of fighting with al-Shabab or other Islamist groups.
Yup, tax dollars for terrorists.
It seems that these bums want a little excitement in their lives.
So they’re joining al-Shabab.
Since 2008, as many as 40 men from Minneapolis have joined Islamist groups after being pulled in by jihadists through social media, federal officials say. Last year, an American youth named Douglas McAuthur McCain died in Syria fighting for the Islamic State. Mr. McCain was recruited in Minnesota, where he lived. In 2009, another Minnesota youth, Troy Kastigar posted a recruiting video for al-Shabab before he was killed fighting for the terrorist group in Somalia. Kastigar and McCain are thought to have been friends. That same year a Somali man who left Minneapolis joined al-Shabab and blew himself up in a suicide bombing at an Ethiopian consulate in Somalia, killing 24 people.
Just like the Tsarnaev brothers. Just like the deadbeat scrounger from Australia, the nutjob moocher from the United Kingdom, and the wacko sponge in France.
So now let’s circle back to our main question. Why is the federal government bringing people into the country, luring them into dependency, and subsidizing terrorism?
Leftists sometimes like to tell us that “Government is simply the name for the things we do together.”
Well, “we” do some really stupid stuff when we act “together” through government.
Instead of a misguided refugee program that steers dodgy people into dependency, why not – with a condition of no handouts or dependency – open the door to Chinese engineers? Romanian software experts? Or Indian scientists? How about Nigerian businessmen? Maybe French doctors?
But I guess people who would assimilate and contribute to our economy aren’t as attractive as welfare recipients who despise our culture.
[…] P.S. To ensure that win #3 actually happens, it would be nice to keep Russian immigrants from getting ensnared in America’s dependency-creating refugee system. […]
[…] And the U.S. refugee program includes automatic eligibility for handouts, making it, in part, a “terrorist-funding welfare scam.” […]
[…] P.S. I wouldn’t be surprised if Ms. Dualeh was introduced to the welfare system thanks to America’s poorly designed refugee program. […]
[…] the United States, by contrast, we import them and give them welfare. I’m not sure which approach is more […]
[…] the United States, by contrast, we import them and give them welfare. I’m not sure which approach is more […]
[…] And they may not even want to earn a better life. They may simply want to get on the gravy train of government handouts (which is why I’m not a fan of America’s dependency-inducing refugee program). […]
[…] It happens a lot in other nations. And it’s now happening with disturbing frequency in the United States. […]
[…] the State Department actually has a program that takes “refugees” from countries with terrorism problems and signs them up for […]
[…] let’s also not forget that American taxpayers subsidize jihadists, so we can’t really laugh too much about the […]
[…] In any event, Americans shouldn’t throw stones because we live in a glass house based on our foolish laws that shower refugees with initiative-sapping […]
[…] In any event, Americans shouldn’t throw stones because we live in a glass house based on our foolish laws that shower refugees with initiative-sapping […]
[…] see little hope of fixing a refugee program that lures newcomers into welfare dependency (and may breed terrorism by creating a dispiriting environment of […]
[…] see little hope of fixing a refugee program that lures newcomers into welfare dependency (and may breed terrorism by creating a dispiriting environment of […]
[…] P.P.S. American readers shouldn’t get too smug about the stupidity of our terrorism-subsidizing cousins on the other side of the Atlantic. We also have self-destructive policies that subsidize terrorism. […]
[…] And I imagine that refugee status in Europe means access to welfare, so the system presumably creates the same perverse incentives we find on the American refugee program. […]
[…] And I imagine that refugee status in Europe means access to welfare, so the system presumably creates the same perverse incentives we find on the American refugee program. […]
[…] And I imagine that refugee status in Europe means access to welfare, so the system presumably creates the same perverse incentives we find on the American refugee program. […]
[…] In my humble opinion, the most troubling aspect of our immigration system is the way the refugee program is funding terrorists with welfare […]
[…] Speaking of which, the United States also has a self-destructive habit of giving handouts to radicals who oppose civilization. The Tsarnaev family was on the public teat and there have been lots of Somali terrorists sponging off America’s bizarre welfare-encouraging refugee program. […]
[…] our State Department actually seeks out these people and brings them to the country to sponge off […]
[…] our State Department actually seeks out these people and brings them to the country to sponge off […]
[…] start with some grim news from Minnesota. I’ve already commented on the insanity of using the State Department’s refugee program to subsidize […]
[…] system based on refugee status is arbitrary because you get to come to America based on geopolitical […]
[…] but want to make sure we attract people who want to work and assimilate rather than scroungers (and worse) who want welfare and […]
[…] but want to make sure we attract people who want to work and assimilate rather than scroungers (and worse) who want welfare and […]
[…] Though let’s at least give Sweden credit. I’m not aware that its welfare programs are subsidizing terrorism, which can’t be said for the United Kingdom, Australia, France, or the United States. […]
[…] Though let’s at least give Sweden credit. I’m not aware that its welfare programs are subsidizing terrorism, which can’t be said for the United Kingdom, Australia, France, or the United States. […]
[…] Though let’s at least give Sweden credit. I’m not aware that its welfare programs are subsidizing terrorism, which can’t be said for the United Kingdom, Australia, France, or the United States. […]
[…] wrote last month about how the State Department’s refugee program is a trainwreck because it is bringing […]
we are in deep deep trouble with regard to the issues of immigration and terrorism… and our sweet smelling… rosy-cheeked democrat and republican politicians are proving worthless… in addressing immigration security issues… anyone with interest in the problem should read Michael Cutler’s assessment of the situation… it’s bleak…
Mr. Cutler is a retired Senior Special Agent of the former INS (Immigration and Naturalization Service) whose career spanned some 30 years…
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/michael-cutler/what-are-you-really-willing-to-do-to-stop-terrorists-from-entering-the-u-s/
we have a lot to think about between now and the next election cycle… this piece gives us a kick in the pants…
“The Ten Commandments for a Better American World”
by Tom Engelhardt
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175962/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_the_ten_commandments_for_a_better_american_world/#more
this isn’t so much an immigration issue as it is one of national security… the Tsarnaev brothers of the Boston marathon bombing fame… were the children of parents who received asylum in the U.S…. and drew welfare benefits from the state of Massachusetts … the bombings killed 3 people and reportedly injured as many as 264… when militarily trained jihadi commandos begin filtering back into our society… I think we can expect events that will not fill Joe Biden with pride…
If immigration was like the NFL draft, we would pick the creme of the crop from the world’s best candidates. And, similar to the draft, we would pick them for specific talents that our team needs.
Instead, we are forced to accept many who have no chance and there is no process to cut them from the team. These weak candidates end up crowding out the best.
NFL style immigration would maintain the individual competition and innovation necessary to keep us at the top of our game. Instead, we are slipping into mediocrity.
Joe Biden:
“I’m proud of the American record on culture and economic integration of not only our Muslim communities but African communities, Asian communities, Hispanic communities… And the wave still continues. It’s not going to stop. Nor should we want it to stop. As a matter of fact, it’s one of the things I think we can be most proud of.”
internet terrorist recruiting propaganda specifically addresses Muslims from Minnesota… npr is reporting that Somalis are petitioning congress for suspension of capital transfer laws so that they can more easily send money to family in Somalia… and you can bet that some of that money will be welfare benefits from Minnesota… crime will be increasing… rape… drug use… gang activity… and… in time… no-go zones… we are seeing it all now… in Europe… American multiculturalism will not be any more successful than it’s European counterpart… and it’s likely to bring death and destruction to our people…
why are we doing this? to make Joe Biden proud?
I gather some small comfort in knowing that at least they are freezing their noogies off. Got to be a shock moving from sub-tropical Somalia to negative 20 degrees. You’d think they would want to work hard just to stay warm!
Problem I see is they seem to export this terrorism. Maybe if they started blowing up a few things in Minnesota, they’d get the message.
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
“Minnesota, the France of America.” Ouch!
[…] Since 2008, as many as 40 men from Minneapolis have joined Islamist groups after being pulled in by jihadists through social media, federal officials say. Last year, an American youth named Douglas McAuthur McCain died in Syria fighting for the Islamic State. Mr. McCain was recruited in Minnesota, where he lived. In 2009, another Minnesota youth, Troy Kastigar posted a recruiting video for al-Shabab before he was killed fighting for the terrorist group WAIT, THERE’S MORE… […]