It’s probably not a fun time to be a police officer. The deaths of Michael Brown in Missouri and Eric Garner in New York have led some – including the Mayor of New York City – to explicitly or implicitly accuse cops of systemic racism.
And then you have folks like me, who grouse about cops for reprehensible abuse of citizens as part of the drug war, as well as disgusting examples of theft using civil asset forfeiture.
Heck, any decent person should get upset about some of the ways law enforcement officials abuse their powers. Consider these excerpts from a nightmarish story out of Houston.
Chad Chadwick has something many citizens can only covet – a spotless record. …But on the night of September 27th, 2011 Chadwick’s commitment to living within the law did him no good at all. It started when a friend concerned for Chadwick’s emotional well-being called Missouri City police to Chad’s Sienna apartment where he’d been distraught, drinking and unknown to anyone, had gone to sleep in the bathtub. A SWAT team was summoned.
I’m not sure why a SWAT team was needed in this case, but that’s not the horrific part of the story.
Here’s what then happened.
“They told a judge I had hostages. They lied to a judge and told him I had hostages in my apartment and they needed to enter,” said Chadwick. …Chadwick’s firearm possession apparently prompted SWAT to kick in his door, launch a stun grenade into the bathroom and storm in, according to Chadwick, without announcing their identity.
“While I had my hands up naked in the shower they shot me with a 40 millimeter non-lethal round,” said Chadwick. A second stun grenade soon followed. “I turned away, the explosion went off, I opened my eyes the lights are out and here comes a shield with four or five guys behind it. They pinned me against the wall and proceeded to beat the crap out of me,” said Chadwick. That’s when officers shot the unarmed Chadwick in the back of the head with a Taser at point blank range. …And it wasn’t over. “They grabbed me by my the one hand that was out of the shower and grabbed me by my testicles slammed me on my face on the floor and proceeded to beat me more,” said Chadwick. Chadwick, who hadn’t broken a single law when SWAT burst through his door, was taken to the Ft. Bend County Jail with a fractured nose, bruised ribs and what’s proven to be permanent hearing loss. He was held in an isolation cell for two full days.
Did Mr. Chadwick then get a profuse apology when it was determined that he hadn’t broken any laws?
Not exactly.
Ft. Bend County District Attorney John Healy sought to indict Chadwick on two felony counts of assaulting a police officer, but a Grand Jury said no law was broken. …but Healy’s prosecutors tried misdemeanor charges of resisting arrest, calling more than a dozen officers to testify. Those charges were dropped as well.
The government eventually did figure out a way to get Mr. Chadwick into court, but it didn’t turn out so well.
A month ago, three years after the SWAT raid, a jury found Chad Chadwick not guilty of interfering with police. With tears in their eyes members of the jury offered the exonerated defendant comforting hugs. “They tried to make me a convict. It broke me financially, bankrupted me. I used my life savings, not to mention, I lost my kids,” said Chadwick.
This is one of these cases where I hope Mr. Chadwick sues and gets generously compensated (and I would want any damages to be financed out of the budgets of the officials who misbehaved).
Defenders of the police will argue, quite correctly, that we shouldn’t smear entire police forces or the overall justice system simply because there are some bad cops and unethical prosecutors.
That’s certainly the right attitude, though it’s worth noting that sometimes the “culture” of a police force can get so poisonous that wholesale dismissal is the only way to get better performance.
Here are some passages from a New York Times report about a city in New Jersey that got far better results by firing its entire police force.
It has been 16 months since Camden took the unusual step of eliminating its police force and replacing it with a new one run by the county. …the old force had all but given up responding to some types of crimes. Dispensing with expensive work rules, the new force hired more officers within the same budget — 411, up from about 250.
It hired civilians to use crime-fighting technology it had never had the staff for. …Average response time is now 4.4 minutes, down from more than 60 minutes, and about half the average in many other cities. …In June and July, the city went 40 days without a homicide — unheard-of in a Camden summer. …And while the unrest in Ferguson, Mo., has drawn attention to long-simmering hostilities between police departments and minority communities, Camden is becoming an example of the opposite. “We’re not going to do this by militarizing streets,” Chief Thomson said. Instead, he sent officers to knock on doors and ask residents their concerns. He lets community leaders monitor surveillance cameras from their home computers to help watch for developing crime.
An even more dramatic example comes from Georgia, a country of 5 million people wedged between Russia and Turkey.
As part of a series of reforms to create free markets and honest government, all 15,000 cops from the State Traffic Inspection Office were fired.
Georgian authorities chose a radical method of reforming the police structures which were not working. …The State Traffic Inspection was one of the most corrupt units in the Georgian government. It was almost totally self-financed, fleecing both local and foreign drivers as they traveled Georgian roadways. According to estimates, 80 percent of the money extorted from drivers was distributed along the chain of command all the way up to the minister. …In early summer of 2004, Merabishvili eliminated the State Traffic Inspection, firing all fifteen thousand employees in a single day! Two months later, in August 2004, the force was replaced by competitive hiring of employees for the newly formed US-style highway patrol. During the two-month transition period there was no policing of the roads, and yet the number of car accidents did not increase. There were no riots.
The part about nothing bad happening when there were no cops is especially revealing.
Sort of like how nothing bad happened during the sequester, even though President Obama warned of terrible consequences (humorously captured by these cartoons).
Or when we got welfare reform in the 1990s and poverty went down instead of increasing as the left predicted.
But now let’s defend cops, who actually help fulfill one of the few legitimate functions of government. And there are two reasons they deserve defending.
First, the vast majority of them almost certainly are good and decent people who simply want to help others by fighting and deterring crime. That’s a real value.
Second, almost all of the bad stories about cops exist because politicians have enacted bad laws. I’ve made this point about the drug war. I’ve made this point about asset forfeiture. And I’ve made this point in the case of Eric Garner.
If politicians didn’t criminalize victimless behavior, most horror stories would disappear.
And if politicians didn’t treat police departments as backdoor vehicles for taking money from citizens, there would be no need for some of the unfortunate interactions that now occur between cops and citizens.
Now let’s defend the police from a very incendiary charge. Are cops racists, as some protesters (and government officials) would like us to believe?
Well, I’m sure there are some racist cops (of all colors), just as there are racist accountants, truck drivers, bureaucrats, and even economists. But the real issue is whether racism is a pervasive problem.
And when looking at one of today’s hot-button issues, the answer seems to be no. Kevin Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute has some compelling evidence that the police do not disproportionately kill blacks.
…understanding the relationship between African-American communities and law enforcement requires a deeper analysis than a single headline… One simple way to check for bias is to see whether the number of violent crimes needed to explain one police-related death is different depending on one’s race. …
We divide the number of violent crimes by the arrest-related deaths for each race. The quotient tells us, on average, how many violent crimes it takes, by race, to produce one arrest-related death. If police are unambiguously racist, then it should take fewer violent crimes to induce one death in the African-American community. As the chart shows, according to our data, African Americans and white Americans have roughly the same proportion of violent crimes to police-related deaths. …These numbers are strikingly similar. The difference between them is small, and not statistically significant. …police appear to be treating the races the same.
But that hasn’t stopped the Obama Administration from subsidizing a group that produced a video that seemingly condones cop killing.
The Obama administration’s Justice Department funneled at least $1.5 million in grants to a New York legal-aid group featured in a new rap video that depicts two young black men aiming handguns at a white police officer. …The video for “Hands Up,” which also shows a white police officer gunning down a black motorist wearing a hoodie, contains lyrics suggesting revenge for much-publicized deaths of black men in confrontations with police. …The organization, which was founded in 1997 and boasts some high-powered corporate lawyers on its board, has enjoyed a steady flow of taxpayer dollars since President Obama took office in 2009.
This is disgusting.
Accusing cops of systemic racism without evidence is bad enough, but to subsidize a group that glorifies cop killing is downright evil.
But the bottom of line of this post is that our main problem is too many laws that are either designed to collect revenue or to dictate private behavior.
That’s where reforms should focus, not on vilifying the average cop.
P.S. I can’t resist sharing an amusing anecdote about cops. Several years ago, I spoke at the Liberty Forum in New Hampshire, a conference connected with the Free State Project. Many of the participants were avid practitioners of “open carry,” which meant they had handguns strapped to their sides. At one point, I was riding with several of these folks down the elevator at the conference hotel and a family got in. A young boy noticed all their weapons and asked “Are you guys cops?” One of them cheerfully responded, “No, we’re the good guys.”
P.P.S. On the other hand, I also have a less-than-amusing anecdote.
[…] column focused on how police unions protect the bad apples who misbehave and therefore cause some people to resent law enforcement, especially in the minority […]
[…] I favor oversight so that good cops aren’t tarnished by the behavior of bad cops. […]
[…] Today we’re going to look at the Oakland police department, which is a part of the government that presumably should exist (though Camden, NJ, shows that maybe we shouldn’t make that assumption). […]
[…] bottom line is that Kaepernick and the other players have identified a very real and very important […]
[…] is not that jury nullification is a great thing. It’s only a second-best solution to the real problem of bad laws (exacerbated occasionally by bad prosecutors or bad […]
[…] instance, I wrote two years ago about the nation of Georgia getting rid of an entire division of the national police force, which sounds like a move to enable crime. But there was a story behind the story. It turns out […]
Some of our founding fathers wanted to put a 24-year limit on laws. That would have the benefits of eliminated obsolete laws and reduce the number of laws on the books, which currently is greater than 1.5 Million.
I challenge any lawyer to claim he can live by all the laws currently on the books. If a lawyer can’t, what hope is there for the average citizen?
[…] P.S. And if we have fewer bad and needless laws, we’ll have less police abuse. […]
[…] isn’t whether police forces should be abolished (though Camden, New Jersey, got good results by doing exactly that). But skepticism of police budgets and police behavior is still very appropriate. Indeed, one […]
[…] P.S. For what it’s worth, I think libertarians are very intellectually honest. Most of us think that government should be providing national defense and legal protection, for instance, but that doesn’t stop us from pointing out that the Pentagon wastes money or that local police forces can be inefficient or unjust. […]
[…] P.S. For what it’s worth, I think libertarians are very intellectually honest. Most of us think that government should be providing national defense and legal protection, for instance, but that doesn’t stop us from pointing out that the Pentagon wastes money or that local police forces can be inefficient or unjust. […]
In the case of the guy killed in New York for selling cigarettes, I think the entire nation would have gotten behind them if they had simply stated it was a case of police brutality, and left the race part out. From the films, you could clearly see it was one panty-waist cop who felt he had to show the big guy who was boss. Taking advantage of his position of authority- unfortunately typical for many cops, and the reason the average citizen has learned to disrespect them. Add to that the fact that they are forced to enforce laws that even they think are stupid, and its a recipe for disaster. It’s hard to respect a person who does not respect the very rule he is shoving down your throat.
In Austin Texas, they recently enacted a law that you cannot TOUCH your cell phone while your vehicle is in motion. Let’s see what the enforcement of that law does for citizen/police relations. Sure, it will be a revenue generator- but do we really need that kind of revenue?
bad cop… ill-trained in the use of militarized force… arrogant… scared… a man or woman who believes that the American people are the enemy…
if the governor of a state needs military force to maintain order… he or she can call up the state’s national guard…. some additional training might be required in some cases… but the guard has both a state and federal mission… and is well versed in the effective use of military equipment and tactics…
good cop…. I had occasion this week to interact with a couple of my counties sheriffs deputies… I was not feeling well… and they were concerned… I had never met these men before… we talked… and they asked me if I needed to see a doc…. I said yes… but I couldn’t get and appointment until Wednesday… we shook hands and they went on their way….
Wednesday night… there was a knock on my door… it was one of the deputies…, he asked if I had a chance to see doc… I told him I had… and shared the ordeal with him… he said “we were just worried about you… and I thought I would check on you”…
re; civil forfeiture
You cannot take a citizen’s property without meeting certain safeguards with a neutral magistrate. Civil forfeiture as exercised by the police state is unconstitutional,despite what some non-thinking person in a robe says.
There are endless reasons to not support the police state, the state government nor the fed.gov as it is.
Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
There Are some Bad Cops, but the Real Problem Is Bad Laws
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
I think it was the Roman writer Tacitus who said “The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”
Dan,
I think follow statement is more that a little naive.
“First, the vast majority of them almost certainly are good and decent people who simply want to help others by fighting and deterring crime. That’s a real value.”
At least if you consider police not arresting one of their own for something you or I would be locked up for. I find it very hard to believe that an officer could serve more than say 6 month to maybe a couple of years without at least seeing a fellow officer do something that anyone else would be arrested for.
You make a lot of other good points but tape after tape of officers doing things with other officers around and doing nothing should convince you that most cops are bad. I’m sure that some have good motives when they start but, like politician, once they get in the force they decide the cesspool is a hot tub to coin one of your phrases. I’ve also heard the phrase that “half the cops would do the job for free if they get a badge and a gun” and think it describes the mentality accurately. Hell, even my nephew, who thought he wanted to be a cop, changed his mind after riding around with them on patrol. Perhaps you should try it, you are a good voice for liberty but your statements that the vast majority of cops are good won’t stand up to scrutiny.
Agreed; we are a nation of laws, not people (as originally intended). Blame politicians; they passed them; they deserve all the harsh treatment The People can muster. I think Pennsylvania Avenue should lined with yardarms to remind them who is boss.
On the other hand, having practiced criminal defense in a racist city, the character profile of police is no better that any other segment of society (lawyers and judges also). So there are a fair share of abusive individuals in the over-armed police state. Prosecutors are mostly delusional and judges cater to their whims.
It would be fair to say there is no criminal justice system. It is a criminal injustice system–not that most felons don’t get away with light sentences. Three felonies, with at least one a crime of violence, ought route the purp to termination in no short order. Three felonies are substantial proof the individual will not conform to societal rules and norms. how much more is necessary to remove them from society?
Forgiving is God’s purview; not ours.
Take away all their military weapons; take away their cars. Put them back on the street. The police will conform to norm citizens expect.
To a degree, I agree with complaints of pervasive abusive police treatment. They no boundaries and are readily willing to lie to save their asses. Seen it. Been victimized. Police do not respect citizens to any reason level. Since I pay their salaries they ought to salute me.
I also agree that bad treatment is often based on appearance–not necessarily color, but appearance. So if you want to be treated like a hoodlum, dress like one.
The way I read the founding documents militia were authorized to keep the peace; a police state was not contemplated, nor were state police powers. I find both police concepts inconsistent with the proper functioning of a Republic. In particular, a militarized police state as we have now. ©2015
Hello Dan.
A well-balanced article and very informative.
The current onus being projected by this administration is not necessarily just against police officers, but against WHITE people in general. The average white police officer is just as human and just as susceptible to bad behavior as any other human being (and this even includes all other races of human beings). This presidential administration has been all about race from the very start. It has bent over backwards to be overly-accommodating to all other races but whites. This has been more of that “hate whitey fest” that the political powers have been exaggerating the illness of “whiteness”.
What’s more,
The global plan for the world is to “brown the world” as was so stated by then-Vice President Albert Arnold Gore, Jr AND then-President William Jefferson Clinton. We, as white-skinned people, are apparently the big target for elimination by these globalists. Let’s not also forget to mention that it is Planned Parenthood who is the most responsible party for the deaths of black Americans (and other blacks around the world) through abortions. How ironic that it is Planned Parenthood who has been backing the “Black Lives Matter” campaign and some of the most atrocious acts committed by these institutionalized race-baiters?!? A bad cop is just as criminal as the next non-cop criminal. A good cop is what society needs to see more of. That also includes either reforming or doing away with, altogether, the Fraternal Order of Police and other hideous like organizations. They are the agencies who have been consistently running cover for the bad cops, and their enablers – by protecting and justifying even the most heinous criminal acts committed by police officers on the job.
With all that said,
I think you have delivered up a very sound message here!
– Rev. Dragon’s Eye
[…] Georgian authorities chose a radical method of reforming the police structures which were not working. …The State Traffic Inspection was one of the most corrupt units in the Georgian government. It was almost totally self-financed, fleecing both local and foreign drivers as they traveled Georgian roadways. According to estimates, 80 percent of the money extorted from drivers was distributed along the chain WAIT, THERE’S MORE… […]