It’s not uncommon for people to accuse libertarians of using “scare tactics” and “hyperbole.”
They say we present “worst-case scenarios” of what happens when government gets involved, such as when I warn that a value-added tax would become a revenue machine for big government or when I point out that advocates of gun control won’t be satisfied until they ban private ownership of weapons.
But I think these “slippery slope” concerns have merit because, well, the slope very often is slippery.
Consider the federal income tax, which started as a simple 2-page form with a top rate of 7 percent, but now has become a 75,000-page monstrosity with confiscatory rates.
Consider the Clean Water Act, which was enacted to regulate “navigable waterways,” but now has metastasized to the extent that the government now tries to regulate ponds on private property and control the building of houses on dry land.
Consider money laundering laws, which began ostensibly to stop crooks from using ill-gotten gains, but now have become a multi-billion dollar burden that require banks to spy on all customers.
Consider Medicaid, which the Washington Post reported, “was supposed to be a very small program with annual expenditures of about $1 billion,” but now costs taxpayers nearly $500 billion per year.
This list could continue for a long time, but let’s stop with old examples and now look at a new example.
After the 9-11 terrorist attacks, politicians claimed that government needed vast new powers to deal with potential threats. Given the environment that existed at the time, laws such as the PATRIOT Act were enacted.
So has the government used its new powers in a targeted way, focusing solely on bad people who want to kill Americans?
Hardly. The folks at Reason report that extraordinary laws enacted to fight terrorism are now mostly being used to enforce drug prohibition.
When the security state types pushed for passage of the Patriot Act, one of the measures on which they insisted was the inclusion of “sneak and peek” warrants. …Of course, it didn’t take long for law enforcement to discover this security state tool and start putting it to very different use—mostly in the enforcement of drug prohibition.
The article then cites some of the work of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Out of the 3,970 total requests from October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010, 3,034 were for narcotics cases and only 37 for terrorism cases (about .9%). Since then, the numbers get worse. The 2011 report reveals a total of 6,775 requests. 5,093 were used for drugs, while only 31 (or .5%) were used for terrorism cases. The 2012 report follows a similar pattern: Only .6%, or 58 requests, dealt with terrorism cases. The 2013 report confirms the incredibly low numbers. Out of 11,129 reports only 51, or .5%, of requests were used for terrorism. The majority of requests were overwhelmingly for narcotics cases, which tapped out at 9,401 requests.
Wow. Less than 1 percent of these warrants are for fighting terrorism.
And notice how the number of sneak-and-peek warrants has jumped so dramatically. The government expanded its power and we were told that our rights would be protected because the new power would be used in rare circumstances for the extraordinary task of fighting terror.
Now that new power is being used promiscuously for all sorts of purposes.
By the way, it doesn’t happen only in America. Check out these excerpts from a story in the U.K.-based Times.
Sajid Javid, the culture secretary, said that the [BBC’s] use of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) will be included in a wider investigation into enforcement of the TV licence fee, which was launched in response to concerns that too many people were being prosecuted for not paying the £145.50 charge. Ripa, which was introduced to combat serious crime and terrorism, has been under scrutiny after it emerged that it was used by police to obtain journalists’ sources. Yesterday, MPs on the Commons’ culture, media and sport committee said that the BBC had used the surveillance powers against people suspected of evading the licence fee… Ministers have raised concerns that 180,000 people a year are prosecuted, while the BBC argues that removing the threat of criminal action would cost it millions of pounds a year in lost revenue. …John Whittingdale, chairman of the culture committee, said…“Most people regarded Ripa as a fairly draconian measure which was necessary to tackle organised crime and terrorism. Not paying your licence fee hardly falls into that category.” The BBC…said that it was “perfectly legal”. …A BBC spokesman said: “Legislation explicitly grants the BBC the right to use these powers to detect unlicensed use of television receivers...”
Yes, you read correctly. A “draconian” measure to fight terrorism is being used to investigate people who watch TV.
I’m not sure which example is worse, the U.S. government using anti-terror laws to go after potheads or the U.K. government using anti-terror laws to go after the horrible crime of …gasp… untaxed televisions.
But maybe this post could be part of my U.K. vs. U.S. government stupidity contest.
Though this isn’t a laughing matter. If government bureaucrats are already misusing new powers granted last decade, just think how they’ll be abusing those powers next decade.
P.S. Since today’s column indirectly deals with terrorism, it’s a good opportunity for me to recycle some Osama bin Laden jokes, as well as these satirical examples of terror alert levels in Europe.
P.P.S. I shared some amusing cartoons a few days ago as part of my election analysis. Here’s one that definitely belongs in that collection.
He’s already won “man of the year” from libertarians, so Republicans may as well give him awards as well.
[…] are hesitant about this concept, particularly if government is involved. After all, we have many examples of seemingly innocuous ideas becoming nightmarish mistakes (such as adopting the income […]
[…] we have an example of the “slippery slope” in […]
[…] we have an example of the “slippery slope” in […]
[…] we have an example of the “slippery slope” in […]
[…] don’t fear the “slippery slope” because we’re paranoid. We fear it because we understand the perverse incentive […]
“Your Personal Location Data Is Being Sold to the Government, and It’s Worse Than You Thought”
By Matt Margolis
https://pjmedia.com/trending/your-personal-location-data-is-being-sold-to-the-government-and-its-worse-than-you-thought/
[…] Instead, I want Yang’s announcement to be a teachable moment about the “slippery slope.” […]
[…] to what we have today, that was a pretty good system. But it seems inevitable that politicians – sooner or later – will manipulate and abuse any power they […]
[…] It’s a slippery slope! […]
“Five Things You Didn’t Know Silicon Valley Was Tracking”
by FREE OUR INTERNET (SPONSORED)
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/04/24/five-things-didnt-know-silicon-valley-tracking/
[…] like people to be suspicious of the federal government. But I’d much prefer them to be concerned because they’re […]
[…] fear is based on lots of real-world evidence. It turns out that slippery slopes are very […]
Has James Clapper been indicted for perjury yet?
————————— NO ——————————
“It has been 1398 days since James Clapper
lied to Congress and the American people.”
http://www.hasjamesclapperbeenindictedyet.com/
[…] fear is based on lots of real-world evidence. It turns out that slippery slopes are very […]
[…] right. The slippery slope is real. Giving governments some power invariably means giving governments a lot of […]
[…] there are very good reasons, when dealing with government, to fear that the slope actually is […]
[…] there are very good reasons, when dealing with government, to fear that the slope actually is […]
[…] keep in mind that slippery slopes are very slippery when government is […]
POTPOURRI-c.swinney Copied from twc.org 8-29-14. It will be wise to read the numerous details A. End the endless wars. Repeal the 2011 Authorization for the use of military force. Disclose the rule for use of drones Repeal the Patriot Act Close that durn useless Gitmo The U.S. has involvement with 40 of 54 countries on the African continent. Congress should listen to the peopleâs skepticism of foreign involvements. 98 major weapons systems. Waste galore. Hundreds of bases offshore . Prevent the next war. Keep trigger happy ones off the trigger. B. Three myths. America is derived from individual efforts of the strong, the producers. The Government cannot do anything. Government punishes success. Get a reasonable minimum wage not the 1968 one we have. C. Who Cares About our General Welfare? Wall Street and Bid Banks. Which is worse? Koch or Coke? I.O.U. other countries. Owed 15B in 1981 to 528B in 2012. Buy Cheap/Pay High. America once had a tariff on these imports.
D. Free Market monopolies 3 corp. own about 75% of all health insurance sold. 4 own 90% of grain. 3 control 70% of beef. 4 control 58% of pork and chicken- 4 control breakfast foods and snack foods, 60% of cookies and 50% of ice cream. 4 own 89% of cell phone market. 4 control 50% of internet. 4 control 50% of internet.
E. REDISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH The size of the American economy DOUBLED between 1980 & 2005. Yet! During that period the 90% of Americans saw their income drop by an average of $4000. The top 1% saw their income rise. From 2002-2007 the wealthiest 1% had 2/3rds of the income gain and owned34% of wealth. The top 1% own 72% of the nationâs wealth. 50% own only 2.5% of wealth. The 400 richest have an average income of 345 million double what they had in 2001. Bush slashed their tax rate from 28.5% to 16.6%. The problem is the redistribution of wealth away from the middle and working class. The situation is far from hopeless, but it requires an enormous act of will for the country to grow up.
F. PUBLIC FINANCED ELECTIONS Fully 80% of voter believe it is likely, as a result of so much money in elections at this date.
G. REMEMBERNG RONALD REAGAN He gave Amnesty to illegal immigrants. He shored up Social Security. He was a union leader in the past. He opposed weaponization. He dreamed of a world free of nuclear weapons. He raised taxes 7 times.
and….
“The FBI: America’s Secret Police”
John W. Whitehead
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/11/08/the-fbi-america-secret-police.html
“if you have nothing to hide…………… you have nothing to fear…”
“Joseph Goebbels, the head of Nazi Germany’s Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.”
I fear it’s worse than anyone suspects…
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175919/tomgram%3A_shamsi_and_harwood%2C_an_electronic_archipelago_of_domestic_surveillance/#more
Reblogged this on keithknight13.