I recently gave five reasons why the shutdown fight was worthwhile and my number one reason was that it’s better to be on offense than defense.
It seems I’m not the only one to reach this sensible conclusion. Here’s some of what Fred Barnes wrote today for the Wall Street Journal.
In the deal that ended the government shutdown, Republicans…got almost nothing they’d sought. But what has been largely overlooked is that the deal didn’t curtail, much less end, the automatic spending cuts known as the budget sequester. And undoing the sequester is what President Obama and Democrats wanted most of all. The survival of the automatic spending cuts gives Republicans the upper hand in confronting the White House and congressional Democrats on budget issues… For Republicans eager to corral federal spending—and that’s most of them—the sequester is a gift that keeps on giving. …Democrats, especially Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, are fit to be tied as they watch cherished social programs gradually shrink.
Other than the assertion that social programs are shrinking (they’re simply not growing as fast), Barnes is right. By going on offense on Obamacare, Ted Cruz and his allies put the left on defense and prevented them from successfully organizing to undo the sequester.
Kudos to the Tea Party for being willing to do the right thing against uphill odds.
In his column, Barnes explains that the sequester has been great news.
To say the sequester has backfired for Democrats is putting it mildly. …The sequester is cuts and only cuts. As a result, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell noted proudly last week when announcing the end of the shutdown that “government spending has declined for two years in a row [for] the first time in 50 years.” …Saving the sequester “has been a top priority for me and my Republican colleagues throughout the debate” about the shutdown, Mr. McConnell said. …Republicans can sit on their hands and experience the joy of trimming the size of government and, thanks to the sequester, watching Democrats gripe about it.
Spot on. The sequester was a major defeat for Obama (and also a big loss to the Washington establishment).
Moreover, Senator McConnell is correct about government spending actually declining for two consecutive years, which is a remarkable achievement and a sign that the Tea Party has made a difference (though I explained in my post on presidential spending performance that it’s not as impressive as it sounds because of the way TARP money is measured).
So let’s hope Republicans don’t fumble away the sequester as part of some tax-hiking grand bargain that will enable bigger government.
Since we’re doing some after-the-fact analysis of the shutdown fight, this gives me an opportunity to belatedly share some great shutdown images from Buzzfeed. There are about 20 of these, all of which are worth seeing. Here are my three favorite ones.
We’ll start with some horrid anarchists disobeying the government.
Here we have some radicals, probably from the Tea Party.
Last but not least, here are WWII vets who failed to obey the statist clowns at the National Park Service.
P.S. Previous examples of government shutdown humor can be enjoyed by clicking here, here, here, here, and here.
[…] You can see other examples of shutdown satire by clicking here, here, here, and here. […]
[…] at least this battle gives me an opportunity to augment my collection of shutdown […]
[…] This assumes, of course, that Trump has the brains and fortitude to hold firm when the press tries to create a fake narrative about the world coming to an end, (just like they did with the sequester in 2013 and the shutdown fight that same year). […]
[…] do have a shutdown fight, I hope it will generate some amusing political humor, such as what’s at the bottom of this post. Other examples of shutdown-related humor can be enjoyed by clicking here, here, here, here, […]
[…] a shutdown fight, I hope it will generate some amusing political humor, such as what’s at the bottom of this post. Other examples of shutdown-related humor can be enjoyed by clicking here, here, here, here, […]
[…] My favorite bit of shutdown humor is at the bottom of this post, and other examples of shutdown-related humor can be enjoyed by clicking here, here, here, here, […]
[…] My favorite bit of shutdown humor is at the bottom of this post, and other examples of shutdown-related humor can be enjoyed by clicking here, here, here, here, […]
[…] did something similar that year during the partial government shutdown (though at least we got some good humor out of […]
[…] a humorous fringe benefit to government shutdowns, as you can see by clicking here, here, here, here, and […]
[…] P.P.S. Returning to our original topic, here’s my collection of bureaucracy humor. I’ve targeted particular bureaucracies, such as the Postal Service,IRS, TSA, Department of Energy, and National Park Service. […]
[…] P.P.S. Returning to our original topic, here’s my collection of bureaucracy humor. I’ve targeted particular bureaucracies, such as the Postal Service,IRS, TSA, Department of Energy, and National Park Service. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. Here’s some government shutdown humor. And some more at the bottom of this post. […]
[…] And I wish they weren’t so timid about confrontations with Obama since there’s a strong argument to be made that they wound up as winners from the 2013 shutdown battle. That being said, what really matters […]
[…] And I wish they weren’t so timid about confrontations with Obama since there’s a strong argument to be made that they wound up as winners from the 2013 shutdown battle. That being said, what really matters […]
[…] Potential examples of good news include the fact that very little legislation was enacted during the year, the sequester (while it lasted), the overwhelming rejection of class-warfare tax policy in Colorado, and the government shutdown. […]
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/the-unrecognized-shutdown-victory-and-some-after-the… […]
If you and Fred Barnes are right about the sequester being left alone then why did your friend Chris Edwards of Cato write:
Instead, the bigger concern is that the Republicans caved in on renegotiating the discretionary spending levels set by the 2011 Budget Control Act and sequester. Everyone is hailing a “return to normal order” in Congress, but that means a return to the normal process of hiking discretionary spending every year.
from the Asia Times on Line… Commentary and weekly watch by Doug Noland:
“Upon last week’s legislation to reopen the US government and raise the debt ceiling, the president stated that there were “no winners.” Yet equities (and, more generally, financial asset) investors and speculators did just fine. Last week saw the S&P500, the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index and the small cap Russell 2000 all trade to record highs. The week’s 2.8% advance increased the small caps’ year-to-date gain to 31.3%. Google added about 140 points and $38.5bn of market cap last week (to $338bn) to reach an all-time high (up 43% year-to-date). The more speculative “beta” stocks continue to outperform. Chipotle rose 15% last week, increasing 2013 gains to 71%, and First Solar jumped 8.7% to boost year-to-date gains to 82%. The NASDAQ 100 (up 3.7% last week), Morgan Stanley High Tech Index (up 2.6%) and The Interactive Week Internet Index (3.4%) all traded to the highest levels since 2000. Treasury, MBS, and corporate debt prices were higher as well.”
800k federal workers and bureaucrats were laid off… with pay… and it had little effect on the day-to-day lives of most Americans or the financial markets …
what does that tell us?