About two weeks ago, while making an important point about the Laffer Curve, here’s what I wrote about the fiscal disaster in Detroit.
Detroit’s problems are the completely predictable result of excessive government. Just as statism explains the problems of Greece. And the problems of California. And the problems of Cyprus. And the problems of Illinois. …Simply stated, as the size and scope of the public sector increased, that created very destructive economic and political dynamics. More and more people got lured into the wagon of government dependency, which puts an ever-increasing burden on a shrinking pool of producers. Meanwhile, organized interest groups such as government bureaucrats used their political muscle to extract absurdly excessive compensation packages, putting an even larger burden of the dwindling supply of taxpayers.
And in this Fox News interview, I elaborate on these arguments and warned that federal government profligacy – if unchecked – will lead to similarly dismal results for the entire United States.
I want to augment on a couple of my points.
First, I explained that Detroit’s bankruptcy won’t have any major and long-lasting ripple effects – assuming politicians on the state or national level don’t encourage more bad policy with bailouts. If you’re a creditor, it’s not good news that the city owes you money, and it’s also not a cheerful time if you’re a retired bureaucrat hoping for years and years of pension payments and healthcare subsidies, but there’s no reason to expect that Detroit’s problems will impose significant damage on Michigan – particularly compared to the harm that would be caused if Detroit was allowed to continue with business as usual.
Similarly, the United States wouldn’t suffer major consequences if (probably when) California no longer can pay its bills. On the other hand, the European Union and the euro currency are being weakened by the mess in Greece, though that’s because they’ve been subsidizing bad fiscal policy with bailouts.
Second, I made the argument for entitlement reform, specifically the “pre-funding” version of Social Security reform that’s been adopted in nations as diverse as Australia and Chile.
Incidentally, this approach is even bolder than the Medicaid and Medicare reforms in the GOP budgets.
Third, I expressed some optimism that the United States has a chance to implement these much-needed reforms, in part because countries such as France and Japan will blow up before America.
And each time another nation, state, or city gets into trouble, it will strengthen our arguments to put the federal government on a long-overdue diet.
Having a strong argument, though, is not the same as having an argument that will prevail. So even though America still has some breathing room, and even though the economic and moral case for spending restraint is very powerful, we’re in the unfortunate situation of having to rely on politicians in Washington.
So keep places such as Australia in mind just in case you need to escape when America’s fiscal chickens come home to roost.
In conclusion, I can’t resist drawing your attention to something I wrote back in 2011, when I showed the eerie similarity of Detroit’s collapse with the “blighted areas” in Ayn Rand’s classic novel, Atlas Shrugged.
[…] America’s worst-governed city. You can make a case for jurisdictions such as San Francisco, Detroit, New York City, Minneapolis, or […]
[…] York City is a mess, but is it better or worse than places such as Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis, Detroit, and San […]
[…] York City is a mess, but is it better or worse than places such as Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis, Detroit, and San […]
[…] strong competition from places such as New York, Seattle, Minneapolis, Detroit, and San […]
[…] strong competition from places such as New York, Seattle, Minneapolis, Detroit, and San […]
[…] decide because there’s strong competition from places such as New York, Seattle, Minneapolis, Detroit, and San […]
[…] country. Though there’s lots of competition for that honor from places like San Francisco, Detroit, New York City, and Chicago. And John Stossel makes a compelling case for Minneapolis in this […]
[…] might think that the most poorly governed city is a place such as San Francisco, Detroit, New York City, […]
[…] there’s lots of competition for that honor from places like San Francisco, Detroit, New York City, and Chicago. And John Stossel makes a compelling case for Minneapolis in this new […]
[…] San Francisco is a bit of a mess, folks in other cities (such as Seattle, Chicago, New York City, Detroit, etc) can make a legitimate claim that they have the nation’s worst local […]
[…] Connecticut and New Jersey are poster children for failed state policy. And now Seattle can join Detroit as a case study of what not to do at the local […]
[…] guess the top photo might be Detroit. The second photo could be Cuba. And the last photo might be where Al Gore […]
[…] this is a big reason why places such as Detroit already have collapsed. And I fear it is just a matter of time before other local government (as […]
[…] Atlas Shrugs in Detroit […]
[…] an interview last week about Detroit’s bankruptcy, I explained that the city got in trouble because of growing dependency and an ever-rising burden of government […]
[…] but I’m guessing this is a picture of a house in Detroit, so it might be more accurate to pin the blame on the city government rather than the federal […]
[…] but I’m guessing this is a picture of a house in Detroit, so it might be more accurate to pin the blame on the city government rather than the federal […]
[…] I would have expected more jokes about the one-party kleptocracy of Detroit. Maybe that’s expecting too […]
[…] an interview last week about Detroit’s bankruptcy, I explained that the city got in trouble because of growing dependency and an ever-rising burden of government […]
[…] an interview last week about Detroit’s bankruptcy, I explained that the city got in trouble because of growing dependency and an ever-rising burden of government […]
Mike:
Ms. Rand’s situation is nothing like those of the Detroit welfare queens, who have paid nothing and continue to pay nothing into the system that exists for their benefit. SS and Medicare benefits were things that she PAID INTO and thus was elegible to recieve. If you believe that is not the case, maybe you should stop driving on the roads and using other public facilities that were built using your money.
I do wish we would stop holding Ayn Rand up as the high watermark of all that is good.
She was not adverse to claiming state benefits when it suited.
Reblogged this on .
Well, now we basically have Starnesville in Detroit, Wesley Mouch as president and Galt’s Gulch in Chile (sort of.) So I’d say Ayn Rand was right.
[…] Atlas Shrugs in Detroit […]
Before you consider Australia as an escape pod should America go down the tubes, I suggest you thoroughly investigate Australia’s immigration policy. If you are not in certain desirable professions (and of certain age for that) or you do not have a major amount of money to invest in a business in Australia, do not expect to be taken just because you want to be there,and would be a good citizen. Unlike US immigration laws that seem to accept anybody who wants to perform janitorial duties the rest of their lives, Austrlia has requirements that are pretty stringent on white folks. Oh- I forgot to mention that if you’re aboriginal, or other certain other brown races these rules do not apply. Myself- I’m heading to the tanning booth. Yes, they have HUGE political correctness in OZ.
B… bu… but… BUT DAN!!! Melissa Harris-Perry and Ed Schultz all claim that the bankruptcy is all the fault of the small, Republican government in Detroit! And they’re ALWAYS right! Didn’t you get the memo?