I just saw a headline that made me think that libertarian fantasies somehow had turned into reality.
As you can see, 24 IRS employees were just arrested for stealing. But what about the other 105,976 bureaucrats at the Internal Revenue Service who seize our money under the implied threat of violence?
Shouldn’t they be arrested for stealing from us as well?
But then my bubble burst. The story has nothing to do with the injustice of the internal revenue code and the shakedown of American taxpayers.
It turns out that these IRS bureaucrats were busted for getting unauthorized government handouts.
…authorities say Internal Revenue Service employees in Tennessee were stealing unemployment and other benefits while fully employed. On Thursday, 13 of those employees were indicted on federal charges that they lied to get unemployment, food stamps, welfare and housing vouchers. An additional 11 have been indicted on state charges of theft greater than $1,000.
In other words, these “public servants” were guilty of a form of triple dipping.
- They took money from taxpayers as part of their excessive compensation packages.
- Their day job was to then enforce a coercive and reprehensible tax system that took money from taxpayers
- And they then bilked taxpayers yet again by mooching from various handout programs.
I’m actually surprised that they got arrested. Based on Keynesian economics, they should get medals for “stimulating” the economy.
P.S. All humor aside, non-anarchist libertarians face an interesting mental challenge. Many of them view the tax system as a form of theft. And there’s no question that it is enforced – ultimately – at the point of a gun. But with the exception of anarcho-capitalists, libertarians support the kind of limited government envisioned by the Founding Fathers. So how do you justify the taxes needed to finance that limited public sector? Most people would justify tax systems if they’re the result of a democratic process, but libertarians believe in rights rather than untrammeled majoritarianism. So how can they rationalize taxation? I freely confess that I don’t have the right answer. As I’ve noted before, I’m a practical libertarian, not the theoretical type. My job is to somehow figure out how we can shrink the federal government back to 3 percent of economic output. After that, the theoretical libertarians can figure out the thorny issues.
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It also has thieving employees. […]
[…] It also has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] another example of hypocrisy in government. I’ve noted the IRS has thieving employees, incompetent employees, thuggish employees, brainless employees, protectionist employees, wasteful […]
Even though I think libertarians are largely right about what they say, they will not win with many of the American people because of their stance on issues like foreign policy and the drug war. As far as the drug war goes, I say it should be ended. Drug use will not stop because a law prohibits their use. People who use them despite their being illegal will give the government the middle finger.
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] the way, this isn’t the first time a thieving IRS bureaucrat generated a story with a misleading […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
Reblogged this on Awakestate.
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
I have lived a long time in France, and I know the struggle against mediocrity our nations face today, the fight against a people waiting for some political Godot to fix their lives. Bureaucrats don’t form prices, because they produce nothing. They are the proof of the flaw of demand side economics. They take what permits us to produce, and use that to take what was already produced. We need a revolution. Join the struggle for a libertarian republic.
Your humble philosopher,, F A Hayek
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] It has thieving employees. […]
[…] sometimes the IRS deserves some negative attention. The tax collection bureaucracy has thieving employees, incompetent employees, thuggish employees, brainless employees, and victimizing […]
Why does this not suprise me at all?
So 24 IRS employees were just arrested for stealing. Who wudda thunk it? Govt employees stealing? Nahhh.
My only question is how many are still doing this? And in how many other govt agencies? Who police’s the police?
We can expect to see many more stories like this upcoming as the system is rife with fraud, along with the ongoing moral degeneration of society. Better watch out.
Its not a dillema, ideally, taxes would be voluntary. There are several practical ways to do this if govt did only what it is supposed to do, protect individual rights. Anyway, it is impractical to expect that people in general will want to reduce govt, by any amount, without any kind of theory that tells them what it should and should not be doing. As it is now, most people think that the purpose of govt is to do whatever they want it to do, so long as a majority agrees with them. Pragmatism is the theory that theories are unnecessary and in that sense it is part of the problem of statism, not a solution.
the thorniest of issues… is getting libertarians elected in the first place… they are creepy… they have no money to speak of…and they don’t seem to have a realistic plan to transition from a socialist inspired statist system to the libertarian utopia of rural legend… libertarians need a plan… and a slate of charismatic candidates capable of exploiting the extraordinary discontent gripping the country… they need men and women of vision… who can present a viable alternative to the oppressive and nonsensical governance that has become the norm in America… and they need money… lots of money…
that said… perhaps after 25-50 years of transitional libertarian policy… agencies and entitlement programs phased out… with realistic defense planning and spending… after all of that… what’s left could likely be supported by an endowment funded by the sale or lease of federal property and voluntary contributions from patriotic Americans … a diversified portfolio… with no federal taxes….
Since US is a constitutional republic, how were the taxes first set? Not through untrammeled majoritarianism! Taxes were set low because the public sector was minuscule, and public sector was small for a long time because taxes were generally low. Shrinking federal govt. to 3% is a rather romantic vision. Achieving more modest target may lead to better real feats. Aiming for anarcho-capitalism and sorting out the thorny issues.. that time would be way way later on the road to shrinking government.
The issue of how, exactly, to obtain the tax dollars to support government would probably go away if the burden were not so onerous and the effects so crushing. How do you delicately carve out 50% of GDP, use it to enslave those that produced it, depreciate the take as miserly and then demand that the subjects are under enslaved?
3% ? How about starting with 15% or even 20% and see what happens. Maybe our economic growth will shoot up to a growth trendline of 4-5% and we’ll be, more or less, the only western world country that maintains its relative prosperity, keeping afloat in the midst of a three billion emerging world rising tide.
Alas, we’d be lucky to escape the vicious cycle and avoid the French 55% — and swift prosperity convergence to the world average. We can already smell the burning wings of that moth, so what do we do? More hope!
Under the current trajectory of no return, “Lets hope the decline is smooth and controlled” is my only realistic hope. I’ve seen this movie before on multiple screens. I’ve already emigrated once, I’d like to avoid a second. But who knew Europe would follow me across the Atlantic? Did I leave breadcrumbs for the statism hounds or something?
Reblogged this on This Got My Attention and commented:
Good observations. I like the “shrink the federal government back to 3 percent”. Let’s do it!