All statists want much bigger government, but not all of them are honest about how to finance a Greek-sized welfare state.
The President, for instance, wants us to believe that the rich are some sort of fiscal pinata, capable of generating endless amounts of tax revenue.
Using IRS tax data, I’ve shown that this is a very inaccurate assumption. And I’ve also used IRS data to show the President that there are big Laffer-Curve effects when you try to rape and pillage high-income Americans.
Heck, even the Europeans have realized that you can only squeeze so much blood from that stone.
Notwithstanding the misleading rhetoric from the Obama Administration, there are some honest folks on the left who understand and acknowledge that you can’t have bigger government unless you put ordinary people on the chopping block.
- The New York Times endorsed higher taxes on the middle class in 2010.
- The then-House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer also gave a green light that year to higher taxes on the middle class.
In 2012, MIT professor and former IMF official Simon Johnson argued that the middle class should pay more tax.- The Washington Post also called for higher taxes on the middle class last year, as did Vice President Joe Biden’s former economist.
- A New York Times columnist also called for broad-based tax hikes on the middle class tin 2012.
- Last year, a Senior Fellow from Demos argued for higher taxes on all Americans, specifically middle class.
The New York Times seems really fixated on screwing Joe Lunchbucket. Here are some excerpts from an editorial in today’s paper.
…new taxes on high-income Americans are a matter of necessity and fairness; they are also a necessary precondition to what in time will have to be tax increases on the middle class. …As the economy strengthens and the population ages, more taxes will be needed from further down the income scale… But there will never be a consensus for more taxes from the middle class without imposing higher taxes on wealthy Americans, who have enjoyed low taxes for a long time.
What’s particularly interesting about this editorial is that the New York Times is very explicit about political strategy. They support more class-warfare taxes in order to set the stage for higher taxes on the middle class.
We can’t say we haven’t been warned.
[as the economy strengthens…]
Yes indeed better be watching out for that inevitable spurious quarter along the two percent growth trendline when growth temporarily shoots up to say three percent. That is when the middle class gets hit by a new round of permanent tax increases, which will be advertised as temporary.
I do though think more likely that a spiraling sovereign US debt crisis will precipitate VAT, “only until confidence returns to markets”. Once again Europe provides the proven script. The script whereby taxes are ultimately applied to the middle class with least resistance. Learn from those who have been down that road.
Are you aware that, since 1981, it’s been Republicans who have been the big government party?
http://econopolitics.com/2012/10/06/the-republican-lie-that-wont-die/
Michael: Aside from the many flaws in that argument, does it really matter which party deserves the most blame? The problem is not who was responsible, the problem is a government that has grown too big and tries to do too much. It extracts so much from the prosperity-creating members of our society that it is weighing down the entire economy – government is an ebbing tide that is lowering all boats.
[…] https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/the-new-york-times-calls-again-for-higher-taxes-on-m… […]
[…] ARTICLE HERE […]
Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
The New York Times Calls (again) for Higher Taxes on Middle-Class Americans
Reblogged this on AMERICAN BLOGGER: GUNNY.G ~ WEBLOG.EMAIL.
Reblogged this on Two Heads are Better Than One and commented:
A solid post highlighting one of the MSM’s most ubiquitous narratives: “there’s nothing wrong with our country that Taxing-The-Rich can’t cure”.
[…] The New York Times Calls (again) for Higher Taxes on Middle-Class Americans […]
[…] because most of them lean to the right, then maybe you’ll be convinced by the fact that many leftists agree that you can’t finance big government without big tax hikes, particularly on the middle […]
[…] because most of them lean to the right, then maybe you’ll be convinced by the fact that many leftists agree that you can’t finance big government without big tax hikes, particularly on the middle […]
[…] because most of them lean to the right, then maybe you’ll be convinced by the fact that many leftists agree that you can’t finance big government without big tax hikes, particularly on the middle […]
[…] because most of them lean to the right, then maybe you’ll be convinced by the fact that many leftists agree that you can’t finance big government without big tax hikes, particularly on the middle […]