Every so often, I share breakthrough stories about advances in “human rights” around the world.
- In France, it is against the law to say your husband is under-endowed or that your wife is fat.
- Across Europe, a satellite dish is now a human right.
- In Finland, broadband access is a basic right.
- There’s now an entitlement for free soccer broadcasts in Europe.
- In Italy, you have the right to…um…your testicles.
Now, in honor of Sandra Fluke, the United Nations has decided that contraception is a human right. Not just a human right, a universal human right. The New York Times reports on this big news.
The United Nations says access to contraception is a universal human right that could dramatically improve the lives of women and children in poor countries.
So what’s the big deal? Surely people should have the right to buy a condom.
Yes, but we’re talking about the United Nations, so you won’t be surprised to learn that there shouldn’t be any “financial barriers” to birth control, which means people have the right to have other people pay for their fun and games.
It effectively declares that legal, cultural and financial barriers to accessing contraception and other family planning measures are an infringement of women’s rights. …The global body also says increasing funding for family planning by a further $4.1 billion could save $11.3 billion annually in health bills for mothers and newborns in poor countries.
Well, Sandra Fluke surely will be happy about this news. Even though national governments safely can ignore U.N. pronouncements, this is yet another sign of a growing dependency mindset.
P.S. Speaking of Sandra Fluke, you can enjoy some laughs with this great Reason video, this funny cartoon, and four more jokes here.
[…] Both the United Nations and the Obama Administration think there’s a right to taxpayer-financed birth control. […]
[…] should-be-obvious point that a belief in deregulated birth control is not the same as a belief in subsidized birth control. Especially when such policies are a recipe for higher costs and corrupt […]
[…] control, for instance, as well as the Internet, the War on Drugs, monetary policy, and taxpayer-financed birth control), the UN inevitably urges more power and control for […]
[…] control, for instance, as well as the Internet, the War on Drugs, monetary policy, and taxpayer-financed birth control), the UN inevitably urges more power and control for […]
[…] and gun control, for instance, as well as the Internet, the War on Drugs, monetary policy, and taxpayer-financed birth control), the UN inevitably urges more power and control for […]
[…] and gun control, for instance, as well as the Internet, the War on Drugs, monetary policy, and taxpayer-financed birth control), the U.N. inevitably urges more power and control for […]
[…] Predictably, the United Nations supports a “right” to taxpayer-financed birth […]
[…] United Nations wants taxpayer-financed birth control to be a human […]
[…] United Nations wants taxpayer-financed birth control to be a human […]
[…] United Nations wants taxpayer-financed birth control to be a human […]
[…] United Nations, by contrast, is largely ineffective and corrupt (or absurd, as seen by the effort to make taxpayer-funded birth control a “human right”). So while its even more […]
[…] Both the United Nations and the Obama Administration think there’s a right to taxpayer-financed birth control. […]
[…] Both the United Nations and the Obama Administration think there’s a right to taxpayer-financed birth control. […]
[…] Both the United Nations and the Obama Administration think there’s a right to taxpayer-financed birth control. […]
[…] But Sandra Fluke may have the last laugh since the clowns at the United Nations have declared that birth control (almost surely financed by taxpayers) is a human […]
[…] But Sandra Fluke may have the last laugh since the clowns at the United Nations have declared that birth control (almost surely financed by taxpayers) is a human […]
[…] Both the United Nations and the Obama Administration think there’s a right to taxpayer-financed birth control. […]
[…] supranational gun control schemes, attacks on sovereignty of American states, and support for a “right” to taxpayer-financed birth control (though at least they had the good sense to invite me to speak at last year’s “High Level […]
[…] A “right” to taxpayer-financed birth control. […]
No it’s not a dependency mindset; it’s a control mindset. To the people suggesting these measures, they represent control over the people they’re “giving” the goodies to. They gain control by both controlling the people getting the handouts and by impoverishing the people they have to take the resources from to produce the handouts. It’s a win/win for those in power.
And, of course, no one anywhere seems to get that a government big enough to provide everything you need is also big enough to take everything you have. I guess they’re too stupid or naive to think that could ever happen to them or else they haven’t reached that end of the taker/maker scale yet.
I’m getting really fed up with the notion that “basic human right” means “Give it to me for free.” No. It means “You want it? Go get it! Who’s stopping you?”
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
Forward!
Nicki, gross.
I object to the United States making Canadians pay so that Sandra Fluke can have birth control pills.
If Sandy wants contraception so badly, I volunteer to perform her hysterectomy by pulling her uterus out through her eyes.