Washington is filled with people who exaggerate, prevaricate, dissemble, and obfuscate. And those are the people I like. The ones I don’t like are much worse.
That’s why, during the Obamacare debate, I warned that the numbers were utterly dishonest.
We were told, if you remember those grim days, that adopting a giant new entitlement somehow was going to lead to less red ink, but I doubt anybody with an IQ above room temperature actually believed that nonsense, notwithstanding the supposedly non-partisan estimates from the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation.
Well, Obamacare was enacted and we’ve already seen evidence that supporters were being less than truthful.
And now there are additional re-estimates suggesting the problem is much worse than even critics feared.
One wonders whether supporters of the legislation will now imitate Inspector Renault from Casablanca and pretend that they are surprised about this outcome.
Here are some excerpts from an Associated Press report about these “surprise” findings.
Cost estimates for a key portion of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law have ballooned by $111 billion from last year’s budget… the estimated cost of helping millions of middle-class Americans buy health insurance has jumped by about 30 percent for an eight-year period, from 2014-2021. Administration officials say the explanation lies in budget technicalities and that there are no significant changes in the program that would raise concerns. …Cost overruns for the health care overhaul could create new political problems for Obama by undermining the law’s promise to reduce federal deficits. The revised health care numbers, buried deep in the president’s budget, stumped lawmakers and some administration officials earlier in the week. At a congressional hearing Tuesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who is in charge of carrying out the health care law, indicated she was unaware of the changes. …Last year’s budget estimated the cost of the aid to be $367 billion from 2014-2021. This year’s budget puts it at $478 billion over the same period.
A mature and dignified person would resist the temptation to say “I told you so.” But I’m neither mature nor dignified, so here’s an encore edition of my video on the Obamacare cost estimates.
This is a case, though, where I wish I had been wrong. Unfortunately, if you’re predicting bad results from government intervention, you’re on firm ground – especially if politicians are trying to deal with a mess caused by previous forms of government intervention.
[…] Well, the law’s clearly been bad news for taxpayers. […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] I should hasten to add, by the way, that I’m glad that Obamacare isn’t paying for itself since that simply means lots of taxes to accompany all the additional spending. […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] I should hasten to add, by the way, that I’m glad that Obamacare isn’t paying for itself since that simply means lots of taxes to accompany all the additional spending. […]
[…] doctors and hospitals. That could happen in theory, but exploding costs for Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare show that it doesn’t happen in […]
[…] of entitlement programs (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, EITC, Food Stamps, welfare, and Obamacare, etc), here’s a video of how it all […]
[…] resist buying votes by offering ever-more goodies at ever-lower costs (I made similar points in a video explaining why Obamacare would be a fiscal […]
[…] One of the quirkier aspect of Washington policy making is the strategizing that occurs when proposed laws get names such as the “Social Security 2100 Act,” the “PATRIOT Act” or the “Affordable Care Act“. […]
[…] is depressing. Republicans botched the repeal of Obamacare. They’ve already sold out (twice!) on the spending caps in the Budget Control Act, and […]
[…] “that outlays for entitlements (programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare) were the real […]
[…] showed that outlays for entitlements (programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare) were the real […]
[…] on vacation for the next three years and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare would mechanically […]
[…] on vacation for the next three years and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare would mechanically […]
[…] on vacation for the next three years and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare would mechanically […]
[…] on vacation for the next three years and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare would mechanically […]
[…] on vacation for the next three years and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare would mechanically […]
[…] on vacation for the next three years and programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare would mechanically continue. But there is also “discretionary” spending for the […]
[…] as shocked as he was to learn that Obamacare cost estimates were wrong and that childcare subsidies led to higher costs in the […]
[…] is depressing. Republicans botched the repeal of Obamacare. They’ve already sold out (twice!) on the spending caps in the Budget Control Act, and […]
[…] botched the repeal of Obamacare. They’ve already sold out (twice!) on the spending caps in the Budget Control Act, and […]
[…] botched the repeal of Obamacare. They’ve already sold out (twice!) on the spending caps in the Budget Control Act, and […]
[…] he was telling the truth. It was a big deal (albeit a wrong deal) from a fiscal perspective and a health perspective. And it also was a very costly deal for Democrats, costing them the […]
[…] he was telling the truth. It was a big deal — albeit a wrong deal — from a fiscal perspective and a health perspective. And it also was a very costly deal for Democrats, costing them […]
[…] he was telling the truth. It was a big deal (albeit a wrong deal) from a fiscal perspective and a health perspective. And it also was a very costly deal for Democrats, costing them the House […]
[…] the faux stimulus, the cash-for-clunkers boondoggle, the Dodd-Frank regulatory orgy, and the costly Obamacare disaster. And it’s worth noting that the one good policy that occurred during Obama’s policy, […]
[…] totally shocked, just like Inspector Renault in […]
[…] the so-called mandatory programs. Entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, and Obamacare that automatically dispense money to various constituencies are consuming an ever-larger chunk of […]
[…] When politicians create programs and announce projects, they routinely lie about the real costs. Their primary goal is to get initial approval for various boondoggles and they figure it will be too late to reverse path once it becomes apparent that something will cost for more than the initial low-ball estimates. Obamacare is a classic (and discouraging) example. […]
[…] But the biggest change, by far, is that the Department of Health and Human Services used to account for 3 percent of federal outlays, but now eats up 28 percent of the budget. Why? Because of programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare. […]
[…] Well, the law’s clearly been bad news for taxpayers. […]
[…] the so-called mandatory programs. Entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, and Obamacare that automatically dispense money to various constituencies are consuming an ever-larger chunk of […]
[…] the so-called mandatory programs. Entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare, Food Stamps, and Obamacare that automatically dispense money to various constituencies are consuming an ever-larger chunk of […]
[…] Well, the law’s clearly been bad news for taxpayers. […]
[…] Well, the regulation’s clearly been dangerous information for taxpayers. […]
[…] Well, the law’s clearly been bad news for taxpayers. […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] happening, those of us who have been warning about the fiscal burden of Medicaid, Medicare, and Obamacare could rest on our laurels and say “we told you so.” But it’s a Pyrrhic victory because being […]
[…] happening, those of us who have been warning about the fiscal burden of Medicaid, Medicare, and Obamacare could rest on our laurels and say “we told you so.” But it’s a Pyrrhic victory […]
[…] to entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] entitlement spending. I’ve explained, ad nauseam, that programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Obamacare, and Social Security must be […]
[…] Fourth, Social Security is in bad shape, but the main long-run entitlement challenge comes from health-related programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare. […]
[…] has done that would count as a free-market response to the financial crisis? The fake stimulus?Obamacare? […]
[…] has done that would count as a free-market response to the financial crisis? The fake stimulus?Obamacare? […]
[…] has done that would count as a free-market response to the financial crisis? The fake stimulus? Obamacare? […]
[…] laughable claims from the White House, Obamacare is contributing to rising spending on healthcare […]
[…] laughable claims from the White House, Obamacare is contributing to rising spending on healthcare […]
[…] not good news, but Medicaid (which now includes a big chunk of Obamacare) and Medicare are much bigger […]
[…] I’ve argued that it’s a fiscal boondoggle. […]
[…] I’ve argued that it’s a fiscal boondoggle. […]
[…] Obamacare is a particularly painful example from recent history. […]
[…] Obamacare is a particularly painful example from recent history. […]
[…] Obamacare is a particularly painful example from recent history. […]
[…] contributing problems, including Medicare, Medicaid, the healthcare exclusion in the tax code, Obamacare, and the mess at the Veterans […]
[…] since the law went into effect, I’ve pointed out – over and over again – the predictably negative effects of giving the government even more […]
[…] major reason is that it was part of a law that is otherwise a very expensive […]
[…] major reason is that it was part of a law that is otherwise a very expensive […]
[…] not saying Obamacare is good policy. After all, I’ve written over and over again that it is a budget-busting boondoggle that will exacerbate our real healthcare crisis of third-party […]
[…] are many reason I don’t like Obamacare, including its punitive impact on taxpayers and the way it takes our healthcare system even further from a market-based […]
[…] are many reason I don’t like Obamacare, including its punitive impact on taxpayers and the way it takes our healthcare system even further from a market-based […]
[…] Lisa Benson has a very good cartoon about this light bulb, as well as the less-than-shocking news that Obamacare will be more costly than originally forecast. […]
[…] I’ve certainly offered more than my fair share of Obamacare criticism. Since I’m a public finance economist, I’m mostly concerned that the law increases the fiscal burden of government. […]
[…] In 2009, for instance, I warned that Obamacare would be much more costly than advertised, so I certainly wasn’t surprised several years later when the numbers began to climb. […]
[…] not saying Obamacare is good policy. After all, I’ve written over and over again that it is a budget-busting boondoggle that will exacerbate our real healthcare crisis of third-party […]
[…] not saying Obamacare is good policy. After all, I’ve written over and over again that it is a budget-busting boondoggle that will exacerbate our real healthcare crisis of third-party […]
[…] not saying Obamacare is good policy. After all, I’ve written over and over again that it is a budget-busting boondoggle that will exacerbate our real healthcare crisis of third-party […]
[…] not saying Obamacare is good policy. After all, I’ve written over and over again that it is a budget-busting boondoggle that will exacerbate our real healthcare crisis of third-party […]
[…] not saying Obamacare is good policy. After all, I’ve written over and over again that it is a budget-busting boondoggle that will exacerbate our real healthcare crisis of third-party […]
[…] Lisa Benson has a very good cartoon about this light bulb, as well as the less-than-shocking news that Obamacare will be more costly than originally forecast. […]
[…] Lisa Benson has a very good cartoon about this light bulb, as well as the less-than-shocking news that Obamacare will be more costly than originally forecast. […]
[…] Lisa Benson has a very good cartoon about this light bulb, as well as the less-than-shocking news that Obamacare will be more costly than originally forecast. […]
[…] Benson has a very good cartoon about this light bulb, as well as the less-than-shocking news that Obamacare will be more costly than originally forecast. Share this:FacebookPrintEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this […]
[…] Lisa Benson has a very good cartoon about this light bulb, as well as the less-than-shocking news that Obamacare will be more costly than originally forecast. […]
Posted article and “Zorba’s” response in my “Wisdom from the web” feature focused specifically on great comments. As always a great read Dan.
[…] article is: In the Entire World, Is there Anybody Who Is Suprised that Obamacare Is Turning Out to Be Far More E… and begins as […]
This is the same bait and switch that they do at the sleezy car dealers.
I’ve already had about all the rescuing I can stand.
You have not seen anything yet on ObamaCare — and it’s main effect in prosperity suppression will never be seen, just as Europeans never saw it.
It is the effect on perpetually compounding lower growth rates, as the effort- reward curve flattens to European levels, as exceptional work is trimmed to insulate a majority from the consequences of lifetime mediocrity — a mediocrity supported by the various “care” packages. — many more to come as the desperation of decline will inevitably trigger calls for more packages at the polls. Nothing is quite as pivotal and as irreversible in america’s decline as ObamaCare.
That will be the main effect and consequence. But few will recognize it as such. The decline though will be real and felt. Welcome to Europe.
Expecting realistic estimates of costs is unrealistic in and of itself. The Austrian school of economics is based on the idea that things are too complex to EVER estimate the outcomes. Billions or trillions of interactions between self-interested parties will probably always be beyond our ability to predict. The stupid factor is involved in expecting the government to understand that or to care about it. They only wish to convince the sheeple that they know best. What right thinking person would believe “We have to vote for the 2000 page bill so we can see what is in it… and do it NOW or the sky will fall”. It fits perfectly with “Too big to fail”. Yeah, right, like the Roman Empire was too big to fail?
Great accompanying picture from Casablanca!