The Center for Freedom and Prosperity has released another “Economics 101” video, and this one has a very powerful message about the federal government’s so-called War on Poverty.
As explained by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum, the various income redistribution schemes being imposed by Washington are bad for taxpayers – and bad for poor people.
The video has a plethora of useful information, but the data on the poverty rate is particularly compelling. Prior to the War on Poverty, the United States was getting more prosperous with each passing year and there were dramatic reductions in the level of destitution.
But once the federal government got involved in the mid-1960s, the good news evaporated. Indeed, the poverty rate has basically stagnated for the past 40-plus years, usually hovering around 13 percent depending on economic conditions.
Another remarkable finding in the video is that poor people in America rarely suffer from material deprivation. Indeed, they have wide access to consumer goods that used to be considered luxuries – and they also have more housing space than the average European (and with Europe falling apart, the comparisons presumably will become even more noteworthy).
The most important message of the video, however, is that small government and economic freedom are the best answers for poverty. As Hadley explains, poor people can be liberated to live meaningful, self-reliant lives if we can reduce the heavy burden of the federal government.
Last but not least, the video doesn’t address every issue in great detail, and there are three additional points that should be added to any discussion of poverty.
1. The biggest beneficiaries of the current system are the army of bureaucrats that receive very comfortable salaries administering various programs.
2. The Obama Administration is looking to re-define poverty in a way that would expand the welfare state and increase the burden of redistribution programs.
3. The welfare reform legislation of the 1990s was a small step in the right direction because it eliminated a federal entitlement and shifted responsibility back to the state level. This success story should be replicated for programs such as Medicaid.
This last point is worth emphasizing because it is also one of the core messages of the video. The federal government has done a terrible job dealing with poverty. The time has come to get Washington out of the racket of income redistribution.
[…] would be nice, however, if he relied on accurate data. Then again, accurate data would backfire on […]
[…] this is not unique. The big lesson from the so-called War on Poverty is that poverty rates suddenly stopped declining. In other words, government tried to help, but […]
[…] amusing, there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] amusing, there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] his so-called War on Poverty was a disaster for both taxpayers and poor […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it […]
[…] his so-called War on Poverty was a disaster for both taxpayers and poor […]
[…] amusing, there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] amusing, there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] welfare state and the so-called war on poverty has been very bad news for […]
[…] welfare state and the so-called war on poverty has been very bad news for […]
[…] welfare state and the so-called war on poverty has been very bad news for […]
[…] his so-called War on Poverty was a disaster for both taxpayers and poor […]
[…] his so-called War on Poverty was a disaster for both taxpayers and poor […]
[…] amusing, there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it hurts […]
[…] amusing, there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] there’s a very serious point to be made. Politicians already have created a system that rewards people for doing nothing while punishing them for creating […]
[…] welfare state and the so-called war on poverty has been very bad news for […]
[…] welfare state and the so-called war on poverty has been very bad news for […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it hurts […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it […]
[…] more information on how best to help the poor, watch this video from the Center for Freedom and […]
[…] if you like videos, here’s my favorite video about the adverse effects of the welfare […]
[…] Worse than McNamara. https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/new-video-shows-the-war-on-poverty-is-a-failure/ […]
[…] if you like videos, here’s my favorite video about the adverse effects of the welfare […]
[…] if you like videos, here’s my favorite video about the adverse effects of the welfare […]
[…] By the way, I don’t know enough to comment on homelessness and child poverty in New Zealand, but if their welfare state is anything like the mess in the United States, I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the government is actually subsidizing destitution and dependency. […]
[…] That’s the standard argument against conventional handouts such as welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, EITC, and housing subsidies. The plethora of such programs in Washington is bad news for both taxpayers and poor people. […]
[…] That’s the standard argument against conventional handouts such as welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, EITC, and housing subsidies. The plethora of such programs in Washington is bad news for both taxpayers and poor people. […]
[…] That’s the standard argument against conventional handouts such as welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, EITC, and housing subsidies. The plethora of such programs in Washington is bad news for both taxpayers and poor people. […]
Reblogged this on Honey Be and commented:
What would the Green Party think about this?
[…] Click here for a video that explains why free markets are better than redistribution if you really want to […]
[…] if you can click here to learn more about how bad government policies have trapped people in poverty. And if you’re […]
[…] if you can click here to learn more about how bad government policies have trapped people in poverty. And if you’re […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it hurts […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it hurts […]
[…] the real reason to pare back the welfare state is that dependency is bad for poor people, regardless of whether they’re native born or immigrants. Even some honest liberals have […]
[…] that nothing could be worse than the current system. And if you want more evidence, here’s a very powerful video on the failure of the modern welfare […]
[…] Share this video to help others understand the high cost of the welfare […]
[…] worth contemplating for those who are still in post-election-analysis mode. Welfare state programs trap people in dependency. People in that situation naturally worry about who will take care of them, which makes them easily […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it hurts […]
[…] his main message (similar to this video and illustrated by this chart) is that the welfare state hurts the poor even more than it hurts […]
[…] worth contemplating for those who are still in post-election-analysis mode. Welfare state programs trap people in dependency. People in that situation naturally worry about who will take care of them, which makes them easily […]
[…] the real reason to pare back the welfare state is that dependency is bad for poor people, regardless of whether they’re native born or immigrants. Even some honest liberals have […]
[…] the real reason to pare back the welfare state is that dependency is bad for poor people, regardless of whether they’re native born or immigrants. Even some honest liberals have […]
[…] Share this video to help others understand the high cost of the welfare […]
[…] the way, if you want more than just horrifying anecdotes, click here for a video that looks at the dismal impact of the American welfare state and click here to see how Obama has […]
[…] For more information, here’s a short debate I had about the topic, and here’s a video explaining how the welfare state is bad for both poor people and taxpayers. […]
[…] the way, if you want more than just horrifying anecdotes, click here for a video that looks at the dismal impact of the American welfare state and click here to see how Obama has […]
[…] This is why income redistribution is so destructive, not just to taxpayers, but also to the people who get trapped into dependency. Which is exactly the point made in this video. […]
[…] This is why income redistribution is so destructive, not just to taxpayers, but also to the people who get trapped into dependency. Which is exactly the point made in this video. […]
[…] small but important correction in the previous excerpt. As I have noted many times, the “poor are getting poorer” because of “the government’s […]
[…] Because federal intervention has done such a bang-up job for Blacks. Just ask any beneficiary of the Great Society’s urban policies. And that War on Poverty? We fought it, and poverty won. […]
[…] I’ve written and pontificated about the problem of government-created dependency and how the welfare state traps people in poverty. […]
[…] worth contemplating for those who are still in post-election-analysis mode. Welfare state programs trap people in dependency. People in that situation naturally worry about who will take care of them, which makes them easily […]
[…] video contains more analysis, for those who want to learn about the best way of actually reducing poverty. It’s important […]
[…] and Sykes explain that the federalism approach already has been tried with welfare reform, which was very successful. We know that well-designed block grants can work and attract bipartisan support. The best example […]
[…] show that people (or, um…, birds) aren’t happy when they lack self sufficiency. Maybe there’s a lesson here? Rate this:Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
[…] always gravitate to “solutions” that means more government intervention, more government dependency, and more government […]
[…] good results. There’s certainly no positive evidence from Obama’s stimulus. We also know the War on Poverty backfired. And entitlements are a ticking time bomb in the absence of […]
[…] results. There’s certainly no positive evidence from Obama’s stimulus. We also know the War on Poverty backfired. And entitlements are a ticking time bomb in the absence of […]
[…] For those who want more information, watch this video to learn about how government anti-poverty programs hurt the […]
[…] watch this video and decide for […]
[…] ideal approach, as explained in this video, is to get the federal government out of the business of redistributing income. We are far more […]
[…] This is why income redistribution is so destructive, not just to taxpayers, but also to the people who get trapped into dependency. Which is exactly the point made in this video. […]
[…] ideal approach, as explained in this video, is to get the federal government out of the business of redistributing income. We are far more […]
[…] It would have been a good idea to elaborate further on the issue of federalism, but at least I linked Medicaid reform with the success of welfare reform. […]
[…] This is bad for the overall economy because it means a larger burden of government spending and it’s bad for poor people because it undermines their self reliance and self respect. […]
[…] Isn’t that wonderful? Taxpayers are financing programs that undermine marriage. Not that we should be surprised by that results. The federal government declared a “War on Poverty” and wound up increasing dependency and destitution. […]
[…] ideal approach, as explained in this video, is to get the federal government out of the business of redistributing income. We are far more […]
[…] Hadley Heath may look familiar because she narrated this video about the damaging impact of welfare programs for the Center for Freedom and […]
[…] Hadley Heath may look familiar because she narrated this video about the damaging impact of welfare programs for the Center for Freedom and […]
[…] they’re causing financial crises, undermining American competitiveness, crippling upward mobility for the poor, or giving away our money in corrupt vote-buying schemes, it seems that politicians have a reverse […]
[…] radical decentralization. Get these programs out of capital cities like Washington and London. The U.S. welfare reform was a decent start, but get responsibility to the local level. And in cities, put neighborhoods in charge. Have those […]
[…] is one of the reasons why I support the federalist approach to welfare reform. If we shift all redistribution programs back to the states, we’ll generally get better […]
[…] It would have been a good idea to elaborate further on the issue of federalism, but at least I linked Medicaid reform with the success of welfare reform. […]
[…] It would have been a good idea to elaborate further on the issue of federalism, but at least I linked Medicaid reform with the success of welfare reform. […]
[…] this is what matters most. We have decades of experience showing that redistribution programs create dependency and trap people in lives of despair. Rate this: Share […]
[…] those interested, this video looks at the broader issue of welfare, and it includes this graph showing how the so-called War on Poverty has probably resulted in […]
[…] those interested, this video looks at the broader issue of welfare, and it includes this graph showing how the so-called War on Poverty has probably resulted in […]
[…] those interested, this video looks at the broader issue of welfare, and it includes this graph showing how the so-called War on Poverty has probably resulted in […]
[…] those interested, this video looks at the broader issue of welfare, and it includes this graph showing how the so-called War on Poverty has probably resulted in more […]
[…] those interested, this video looks at the broader issue of welfare, and it includes this graph showing how the so-called War on Poverty has probably resulted in more […]
[…] Especially when interventionism and prohibition doesn’t work. To be blunt, the War on Drugs has been a costly failure (much like the War on Poverty). […]
[…] narrated this video making the case for Medicaid reform. The proposal is very simple: Replicate the success of the welfare reform of the 1990s by block granting the program and giving states full autonomy to figure out how best to provide […]
[…] interview and this video have more information for those who want a more detailed look at anti-poverty issues. Share […]
[…] interview and this video have more information for those who want a more detailed look at anti-poverty issues. Rate this: […]
[…] but not least, this is a good opportunity to share the video from last year showing how the so-called War on Poverty has created a dependency trap. The chart at 3:15 is a stunningly powerful powerful piece of […]
[…] 3. A welfare state cripples the human spirit. This was the point eloquently made by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum in a recent video. […]
[…] 3. A welfare state cripples the human spirit. This was the point eloquently made by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum in a recent video. […]
[…] 3. A welfare state cripples the human spirit. This was the point eloquently made by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum in a recent video. […]
[…] 3. A welfare state cripples the human spirit. This was the point eloquently made by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum in a recent video. […]
[…] 3. A welfare state cripples the human spirit. This was the point eloquently made by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum in a recent video. […]
[…] 3. A welfare state cripples the human spirit. This was the point eloquently made by Hadley Heath of the Independent Women’s Forum in a recent video. […]
[…] wonder if he watched this video on the debilitating impact of welfare or looked at these cartoons about the welfare state. GA_googleAddAttr("AdOpt", "1"); […]
Here’s a nifty piece, very short, from the National Center for Policy Analysis:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=18694
It is entitled, “The Poor Need Capitalism.”
Anyone who looks at the facts, including poverty stats, cannot escape the conclusion that only a free market system can solve poverty – not government.
My progressive friends always try to argue that supply side economics, starting with Reagan in the ’80s, is the culprit. When I confront them with the chart showing poverty rates declining steadily until 1968 when War on Poverty started, and promptly reversing course afterwards, they try to change the premise of the discussion as good little progressives that they are.
By the way, I do not know how you do it, but the young ladies you use in your videos are simply stunning. Proves once more that conservative women are much prettier than progressive women.
[…] recently posted an excellent video showing how the War on Poverty has been a disaster for both taxpayers and poor […]
[…] recently posted an excellent video showing how the War on Poverty has been a disaster for both taxpayers and poor […]
The “Otherwise Would Be” Poor (See the link at upper right)
Fred: I’m out of work. I collect unemployment.
Mike: Let me help. I didn’t know it was bad for you.
Fred: No way. When the checks run out, I’ll have to get a job. Feel sorry for me then.
09/14/11 – EconLib by David Henderson [edited]
Tim Worstall: The federal government counts people who are poor without considering many of the benefits the poor receive. If those benefits were included, many millions of those people would not be considered poor.
David Henderson: There is a proposal to increase the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) by applying it to people with larger incomes. Workers at the new upper end would likely cut their work hours. They would recieve less in wages, offset partly by more income through the EITC.
They would be better off than before, counting the subsidy and more leisure, but their before-tax incomes would fall. Statistics would show an increase in poverty, and advocates might call for even larger EITC subsidies.
AMG: Statistics which include people who would be poor without benefits ignore the help they are already getting and exaggerates actual poverty. We should know three figures, the fraction of people in poverty despite aid, the number who are not in poverty because of aid, and the estimated amount people choose not to earn because they are receiving aid.