I’ve remarked before about how I get especially upset when well-to-do people figure out ways of ripping off taxpayers. Redistribution from rich to poor is not a good idea, but it is far more offensive when the coercive power of government is used to transfer money from ordinary people to the elite.
A good (perhaps “reprehensible” would be a better word to use) example if the scam created by international bureaucracies. The folks who work for entities such as the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, United Nations, and Organization for Economic Cooperation get wildly excessive compensation packages. To add insult to injury, their income is tax free!
Here are some excerpts from a Richard Pollack column at Pajamas Media.
At the World Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, the African Development Bank, and at the IMF, you find extravagantly paid men and women who masquerade as anti-poverty fighters for the Third World. As one World Bank vice president said upon his resignation: “Poverty reduction is the last thing on most World Bank bureaucrats’ minds.” These global institutions are supposed to act as non-profits, but big salaries and big perks rule as the norm. And you’re paying for them: as the largest single contributor, American taxpayers pick up the tab. By now everyone knows about DSK’s extravagant $420,000 employment agreement that included an additional $73,000 for living expenses — a provision explained thusly by the IMF: “To enable you to maintain … a scale of living appropriate to your position.” …A PJM survey found that a common annual compensation package for senior management at the anti-poverty banks exceeds $500,000 — tax-free. World Bank President Robert Zoellick currently receives $441,980 in base salary and $284,500 in other benefits. Strauss-Kahn’s deputy, John Lipsky, receives $384,000 in base salary plus “living allowances.” …Ten of Zoellick’s deputies receive tax-free base pay of $321,00 to $347,000, plus enjoy an additional $210,000 in benefits. Even mid-level World Bank employees earn well into six digits: the average salary for a professional manager is $181,000, plus $97,000 in benefits. A senior adviser receives on average $238,000 plus $127,000 in benefits. A vice president receives $286,000 plus $153,000 in benefits. The biggest hidden benefits are the off-the-book perks called “living allowances.” These perks can nearly double a stated salary. Of the 2,600 IMF and 10,000 World Bank full-time employees, all receive some form of supplemental living allowances in addition to their base pay. These include home leave grants, dependent allowances, travel perks, and education “grants” for their children to attend private schools. In addition, they offer generous pensions and health insurance policies. According to a U.S. General Accounting Office study, the average cost for these additional perks added $197,300 per employee cost beyond their base pay in 1994 dollars.
The column doesn’t mention my “favorite” international bureaucracy, which is the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD’s budget is small compared to some of the other parasitic bodies mentioned in the column, but this video explains how big-government policies are being financed with the $100 million-plus of American tax dollars sent to France to subsidize the OECD.
[…] the OECD may be the world’s worst international bureaucracy. Especially since OECD bureaucrats get tax-free salaries while urging higher taxes on the rest of […]
[…] OECD may be the world’s worst international bureaucracy. Especially since OECD bureaucrats get tax-free salaries while urging higher taxes on the rest of […]
[…] One set of rules for the peasants and one set of rules for the elite. […]
[…] that we should be surprised. IMF and OECD officials get very comfortable (and tax-free!) salaries, so they have a “public choice” incentive to reflect the […]
[…] P.S. Maybe international bureaucrats would have a better understanding of economic policy if they weren’t exempt from the income tax. […]
[…] The champion hypocrites are the bureaucrats at the OECD and IMF, who reflexively support higher taxes while receiving very generous tax-free […]
[…] avid cheerleader for ever-higher taxes (which is disgustingly hypocritical since IMF employees get lavish, tax-freesalaries). But the biggest problem with the IMF is that it promotes “moral hazard.” […]
[…] avid cheerleader for ever-higher taxes (which is disgustingly hypocritical since IMF employees get lavish, tax-free […]
[…] from those organizations sincerely support those bad policies (especially since they get tax-free salaries and are sheltered from the negative […]
[…] that has changed. A growing number of people on the left (especially those with tax-free jobs at international bureaucracies) now claim that bigger government actually is the way to get more […]
[…] Why? Because IMF officials get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies). […]
[…] asserted that low tax burdens somehow are a violation of human rights. But since those bureaucrats get tax-free salaries, perhaps they should lead by example and surrender a big chunk of their income before coming after […]
[…] higher taxes. But Ms. Boone won’t have to worry about that since OECD bureaucrats (like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies) get tax-free […]
[…] of bureaucrats recommend tax increases on the rest of us – particularly since they are not only lavishly compensated, but also because they get tax-free […]
[…] bureaucrats recommend tax increases on the rest of us – particularly since they are not only lavishly compensated, but also because they get tax-free […]
[…] it still galls me that international bureaucrats who receive lavish, tax-free salaries spend their days trying to promote higher taxes on everyone […]
[…] All of these proposals are based on the flawed theory that bigger government can promote development. And all of the proposals also are hypocritical since U.N. bureaucrats, like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies, are exempt from tax. […]
[…] because their lavish salaries are tax free, they have an extra incentive to curry favor with […]
[…] encouraging higher tax burdens, which is especially outrageous since its cossetted employees are exempt from paying tax on their lavish […]
[…] encouraging higher tax burdens, which is especially outrageous since its cossetted employees are exempt from paying tax on their lavish […]
[…] please the nations that provide funds (especially since the bureaucrats at places such as the WHO get lucrative tax-free remuneration and they don’t want to derail the gravy […]
[…] You won’t be surprised to learn that IMF bureaucrats receive tax-free salaries while pushing for higher taxes on everyone […]
[…] To add more insult to all the injury, the tax-loving bureaucrats at the OECD get tax-free salaries. Must be nice to be exempt from the bad policies they […]
[…] brings us to the obvious takeaway. As seems to be the case with all international bureaucracies, the United Nations wastes money at a prodigious pace. With […]
[…] To add more insult to all the injury, the tax-loving bureaucrats at the OECD get tax-free salaries. Must be nice to be exempt from the bad policies they […]
[…] Unidos, en China, en Latinoamérica, en Oriente Medio y en Europa. (Los que trabajan en el FMI no pagan impuestos sobre sus salarios, pero está claro que creen en la igualdad de oportunidades cuando piden impuestos más altos para […]
[…] States, in China, in Latin America, in the Middle East, and in Europe. (folks who work at the IMF don’t pay taxes on their own salaries, but they clearly believe in equal opportunity when urging higher taxes for everyone […]
[…] the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which is another international bureaucracy (like the OECD and IMF) that is backed by American […]
[…] international organizations. My criticisms of the IMF, OECD, UN, and WB are solely a function of their work to empower governments at the expense of […]
[…] taxes all around the world, IMF bureaucrats don’t have to suffer the consequences since they receive very lavish tax-free salaries. What a reprehensible […]
[…] this as unintentional humor. Maybe some British politicians will be deterred simply because some tax-free bureaucrats in Paris expressed disapproval. If so, the joke will be on British workers who get lower wages as a result […]
[…] Since their lavish tax-free salaries are dependent on pleasing the governments that finance their budgets, international bureaucrats try […]
[…] Since their lavish tax-free salaries are dependent on pleasing the governments that finance their budgets, international bureaucrats try […]
[…] inequality. The same is true of the OECD, where bureaucrats not only are lavishly compensated (a general rule for international organizations), but they also enjoy tax-free incomes while urging higher taxes on the rest of […]
[…] inequality. The same is true of the OECD, where bureaucrats not only are lavishly compensated (a general rule for international organizations), but they also enjoy tax-free incomes while urging higher taxes on the rest of […]
[…] are comprised of tax collectors from various nations, along with U.N. officials who – like their tax-free counterparts at other international bureaucracies – don’t have to comply with the tax laws of those […]
[…] comprised of tax collectors from various nations, along with U.N. officials who – like their tax-free counterparts at other international bureaucracies – don’t have to comply with the tax laws of those […]
[…] For example, I’ve spent the past few days in Vanuatu, where I’ve been fighting against the adoption of an income tax, and I’ve been repeatedly told that the World Bank is one of the groups (along with the Australian Tax Office) urging the adoption of this anti-growth levy. It is both depressing and upsetting that outsiders are seeking to hinder growth in this poor nation, but what really galls me is that World Bank bureaucrats (like their colleagues at other international bureaucracies) are exempt from paying any income tax. […]
[…] created as part of the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement. But once fixed exchange rates disappeared, the over-funded bureaucracy cleverly adopted a new rationale for its existence and its main role now is to bail out insolvent […]
[…] created as part of the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement. But once fixed exchange rates disappeared, the over-funded bureaucracy cleverly adopted a new rationale for its existence and its main role now is to bail out insolvent […]
[…] Excessive government is the main problem plaguing the global economy. But the international bureaucracies, for all intents and purposes, represent governments. The bureaucrats at the IMF and OECD need to please politician in order to continue enjoying their lavish budgets and exceedingly generous tax-free salaries. […]
[…] not a fan of international bureaucracies. Simply stated, they routinely promote statism, which translates into less freedom and […]
[…] I’m not a fan of international bureaucracies. Simply stated, they routinely promote statism, which translates into less freedom and prosperity. […]
[…] not a fan of international bureaucracies. Simply stated, they routinely promote statism, which translates into less freedom and […]
[…] not a fan of international bureaucracies. Simply stated, they routinely promote statism, which translates into less freedom and […]
[…] bureaucrats get extremely generous tax-free salaries, yet they apparently don’t see any hypocrisy in recommending huge tax increases for the […]
Presumption is that government is even necessary when nearly all work is outsourced, and automated – in era when most bureacrats make their own rules, raise their own salaries, and work as little as they must – then, justify their existence as necessary. The ultimate elitism – arrogance, my how it has grown!
[…] total. Wow, that’s more than $5,500 for a family of four. Remember that these bureaucrats get extremely generous tax-free salaries, yet they apparently don’t see any hypocrisy in recommending huge tax increases for the […]
[…] But I must say none of these examples of hypocrisy can compete with the bureaucrats from the OECD and IMF, both of whom get completely tax-free salaries while pushing for higher taxes on the rest of us. […]
[…] with one irritating difference. OECD bureaucrats get tax-free salaries, so they don’t suffer the consequences of the policies they want to impose on the rest of us. […]
[…] It’s galling, by the way, that the bureaucrats at the OECD pushing for a global tax cartel get tax-free salaries. […]
[…] It’s galling, by the way, that the bureaucrats at the OECD pushing for a global tax cartel get tax-free salaries. […]
[…] that these bureaucrats get extremely generous tax-free salaries, yet they apparently don’t see any hypocrisy in recommending huge tax increases for the […]
[…] final kicker is that the bureaucrats at the OECD get tax-free salaries, so they’re insulated from the negative impact of the bad policies they want to impose on […]
[…] final kicker is that the bureaucrats at the OECD get tax-free salaries, so they’re insulated from the negative impact of the bad policies they want to impose on […]
[…] states are sovereign and don’t need to kowtow to a bunch of mandarins who get bloated (and tax free!) salaries in exchange for…well, I’m not sure what they do other than pontificate, […]
[…] still a critic of international bureaucracies. And I wouldn’t allow myself to be bought off by a lavish, tax-free job at the United […]
[…] The moral of the story is that the United Nations should not be a policy forum. The bureaucrats seem to have no appreciation or understanding of how the economy works, perhaps because they live in a bubble and get tax-free salaries. […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] have to appreciate the supreme irony of pampered international bureaucrats demanding that others should surrender some of their […]
[…] have to appreciate the supreme irony of pampered international bureaucrats demanding that others should surrender some of their […]
[…] have to appreciate the supreme irony of pampered international bureaucrats demanding that others should surrender some of their […]
[…] created very comfortable lives for themselves while the rest of us pick up the tab, as documented here and […]
[…] created very comfortable lives for themselves while the rest of us pick up the tab, as documented here and […]
[…] $550,000 that is diverted from the productive sector of the economy. And, adding insult to injury, her bloated salary is tax free. So we have the grotesque spectacle of a pampered international bureaucrat whining and moaning that […]
[…] still a critic of international bureaucracies. And I wouldn’t allow myself to be bought off by a lavish, tax-free job at the United […]
[…] a critic of international bureaucracies. And I wouldn’t allow myself to be bought off by a lavish, tax-free job at the United […]
[…] a critic of international bureaucracies. And I wouldn’t allow myself to be bought off by a lavish, tax-free job at the United […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] Well, they certainly can afford lots of drugs since they get tax-free salaries (just like their counterparts at other international bureaucracies), but these numbers are the not the result of some ketamine-fueled […]
[…] have another story that is equally upsetting. IMF bureaucrats get tax-free salaries, yet they frequently urge governments to impose higher taxes. And they have a very troubling habit […]
[…] it nice that we give these international bureaucrats big tax-free salaries so they can run around the world pushing for bailouts and higher taxes. Rate this: Share […]
[…] those bureaucrats get tax-free salaries while pushing for higher taxes for the rest of […]
[…] those bureaucrats get tax-free salaries why pushing for higher taxes for the rest of […]
[…] those bureaucrats get tax-free salaries why pushing for higher taxes for the rest of […]
[…] of my disdain for international bureaucracies and my belief in sovereignty, you won’t be too surprised to learn that Ms. Pillay’s […]
[…] not a fan on international bureaucracies, and I wasn’t expecting good advice, but even I’m stunned. Here are some excerpts from […]
[…] 4, 2011 by Dan Mitchell I’ve written before about how I get especially upset when rich people use the coercive power of government to screw […]
[…] Liberty / Govt. Lawless Government International Bureaucrats: Riding the Gravy Train at Taxpayer Expense […]