On the 30th anniversary of his inauguration, I posted a bunch of videos that captured Ronald Reagan’s greatness, but I think we need only one for the 100th anniversary of his birth.
This video illustrates Reagan’s superior understanding of fiscal policy. He points out how the Keynesian economists and politicians were profoundly wrong when they claimed the dramatic reduction in government spending after World War II would cause a deep downturn.
He also explains that the real goal is liberty. And he favorably cites the other great President of the 20th century.
We are so lucky that he was there, in the right place at the right time, and saved the western world.
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] of of free markets and limited government works anywhere and everywhere it is tried. And he was right that big government is bad […]
[…] certainly does not seems to fit with Reagan’s message in this video, this video, or the second video from this […]
[…] certainly does not seems to fit with Reagan’s message in this video, this video, or the second video from this […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] This video I posted in 2011 is my favorite Reagan clip, but here’s a video that also is very much worth watching. […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] only enough to have experienced America’s national rejuvenation under Reagan, you can click here, here, and here to see “the Gipper” in […]
[…] only enough to have experienced America’s national rejuvenation under Reagan, you can click here, here, and here to see “the Gipper” in […]
[…] quite as good as this video, and it’s not even good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good […]
[…] Friedman famously noted that, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program”and Ronald Reagan sagely observed that “a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see […]
[…] I’ve repeatedly heaped praise on Ronald Reagan. […]
[…] quite as good as this video, and it’s not even good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good […]
[…] quite as good as this video, and it’s not even good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good […]
[…] I’ve repeatedly heaped praise on Ronald Reagan. […]
[…] Friedman famously noted that, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program”and Ronald Reagan sagely observed that “a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see […]
[…] quite as good as this video, and it’s not even good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a good […]
[…] quite as good as this video, and it’s not even good enough to get added to this collection of Reagan videos, but it is a […]
[…] This video I posted in 2011 is my favorite Reagan clip, but here’s a video that also is very much worth watching. […]
[…] P.P.S. For younger readers who did not experience the Reagan years, here’s my assessment of his record and here are some videos of some of his iconic remarks (and here’s a bonus video). […]
[…] P.P.S. For younger readers who did not experience the Reagan years, here’s my assessment of his record and here are some videos of some of his iconic remarks (and here’s a bonus video). […]
[…] and rebounded precisely because politicians didn’t revive the New Deal (and, as you can see from this video, President Reagan understood this bit of economic […]
[…] any of those candidates have given these remarks, at least with any […]
[…] any of those candidates have given these remarks, at least with any […]
[…] famously noted that, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program”and Ronald Reagan sagely observed that “a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever […]
[…] Friedman famously noted that, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program”and Ronald Reagan sagely observed that “a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see […]
[…] of of free markets and limited government works anywhere and everywhere it is tried. And he was right that big government is bad […]
[…] of of free markets and limited government works anywhere and everywhere it is tried. And he was right that big government is bad […]
[…] With one exception. We had relatively competent governance from the one GOP president who did have a “contempt for government” (actually, just contempt for big government). […]
[…] I haven’t thought of anyone in the White House as “my president” since Ronald Reagan. […]
[…] If you weren’t sufficiently inspired by Thatcher’s words, here’s Reagan’s tribute to Coolidge and also a memorable passage from his inaugural […]
[…] One of the interesting games in Washington is deciding who on the right (however defined) is a “Trumpie” and who is a “Reaganite.” […]
[…] I noted that Reagan was one of America’s great presidents. I also include Calvin Coolidge and Grover Cleveland on that […]
[…] me miss Reagan even more. The only great president of my lifetime, and either the best or second-best president of the 20th […]
[…] ever a poll that isn’t limited to the post-World War II era, I would urge votes not only for Reagan, but also for Calvin Coolidge and Grover […]
[…] Ronald Reagan pointed out many years ago, Washington is a company town. But rather than being home to a firm or industry that […]
[…] Ronald Reagan pointed out many years ago, Washington is a company town. But rather than being home to a firm or industry that […]
[…] Ronald Reagan pointed out many years ago, Washington is a company town. But rather than being home to a firm or industry that […]
[…] Ronald Reagan pointed out many years ago, Washington is a company town. But rather than being home to a firm or industry that […]
[…] Ronald Reagan pointed out many years ago, Washington is a company town. But rather than being home to a firm or industry that […]
[…] usual approach is to remind them that Ronald Reagan adopted a bunch of supposedly unpopular policies, yet he got reelected in a landslide because […]
[…] usual approach is to remind them that Ronald Reagan adopted a bunch of supposedly unpopular policies, yet he got reelected in a landslide because […]
[…] Last night’s speech left me still wondering, though it’s safe to say Trump does not share Reagan’s instinctive understanding that government is the problem rather than solution. […]
[…] Last night’s speech left me still wondering, though it’s safe to say Trump does not share Reagan’s instinctive understanding that government is the problem rather than solution. […]
[…] would be crazy enough to nominate another Trump in 2020 or whether they might actually find another Reagan-style limited-government […]
[…] summed up my reaction with two tweets, one of which sadly observed that Donald Trump does not share Ronald Reagan’s belief in smaller government and more […]
[…] close by simply observing that Calvin Coolidge (as quoted by Ronald Reagan) understood today’s topic way back in the […]
[…] a huge fan of both Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge, for […]
[…] a huge fan of both Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge, for […]
[…] a huge fan of both Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge, for […]
[…] a huge fan of both Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge, for […]
[…] next year and one of the candidates has a platform that sounds vaguely like he wants to be the Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher of […]
[…] the way, Reagan understood this important bit of knowledge about post-WWII economic history. And if you want more evidence […]
[…] may be the best President of the 20th Century, it behooves me to point out what he said, as cited by Reagan, about shrinking government to save […]
[…] may be the best President of the 20th Century, it behooves me to point out what he said, as cited by Reagan, about shrinking government to save […]
[…] may be the best President of the 20th Century, it behooves me to point out what he said, as cited by Reagan, about shrinking government to save […]
[…] there’s only one good president mentioned in that excerpt if we’re grading overall […]
[…] had a much greater depth of knowledge than even supporters realize. Which also can be seen in this clip of Reagan explaining why the Keynesians were wrong about a return to Depression after World War […]
[…] had a much greater depth of knowledge than even supporters realize. Which also can be seen in this clip of Reagan explaining why the Keynesians were wrong about a return to Depression after World War […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] no secret that I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] any of those candidates have given these remarks, at least with any […]
[…] If you weren’t sufficiently inspired by Thatcher’s words, here’s Reagan’s tribute to Coolidge and also a memorable passage from his inaugural […]
[…] was no Reagan, to be sure, and the anti-government Congress that took power after the 1994 elections may deserve […]
[…] If you want to be inspired, click here and here to see two short clips of Reagan in […]
[…] I’m a big fan of the Gipper, and I’ve shared several inspirational Reagan videos (see here, here, and here). So I’m understandably appreciative of the USS […]
[…] know I’m a big fan of the Gipper, and I’ve shared several inspirational Reagan videos (see here, here, and here). So I’m understandably appreciative of the USS […]
[…] I’m a big fan of the Gipper, and I’ve shared several inspirational Reagan videos (see here, here, and here). So I’m understandably appreciative of the USS […]
[…] I’m not basing that on my own ideological preferences. If you want my opinion, Reagan and Coolidge are among the best (with an honorable mention for Bill Clinton) and FDR, Nixon, […]
[…] was no Reagan, to be sure, and the anti-government Congress that took power after the 1994 elections may deserve […]
[…] simply state that I can’t be a squish if my policy heroes are people like Barry Goldwater, Ronald Reagan, and Margaret […]
[…] sometimes they are on my side. My two favorite presidents are Reagan and Coolidge, and I have great admiration for those few politicians – such as Ron Paul – who […]
[…] Friedman famously noted that, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program”and Ronald Reagan sagely observed that “a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll ever see […]
[…] famously noted that, “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program”and Ronald Reagan sagely observed that “a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we’ll […]
[…] Who moved farther in the wrong direction, U.S. Republicans who went from Reagan to Bush or U.K. Tories who went from Thatcher to […]
[…] any of those candidates have given these remarks, at least with any […]
[…] any of those candidates have given these remarks, at least with any credibility? Or made these comments in a sincere fashion? It’s much more […]
[…] you want some inspiration from Ronald Reagan, these brief remarks reveal his understanding of both economics of history (especially with regards to the other great […]
[…] and rebounded precisely because politicians didn’t revive the New Deal (and, as you can see from this video, President Reagan understood this bit of economic […]
[…] I periodically share two great Reagan videos, which can be seen here and here, but I also have a couple of inspiring videos of Thatcher in action, which can be viewed here and […]
[…] and rebounded precisely because politicians didn’t revive the New Deal (and, as you can see from this video, President Reagan understood this bit of economic […]
[…] I periodically share two great Reagan videos, which can be seen here and here, but I also have a couple of inspiring videos of Thatcher in action, which can be viewed here and […]
[…] If you want to be inspired, click here and here to see two short clips of Reagan in […]
[…] If you want to be inspired, click here and here to see two short clips of Reagan in […]
[…] If you weren’t sufficiently inspired by Thatcher’s words, here’s Reagan’s tribute to Coolidge and also a memorable passage from his inaugural […]
[…] If you weren’t sufficiently inspired by Thatcher’s words, here’s Reagan’s tribute to Coolidge and also a memorable passage from his inaugural […]
[…] was no Reagan, to be sure, and the anti-government Congress that took power after the 1994 elections may deserve […]
[…] you want some inspiration from Ronald Reagan, these brief remarks reveal his understanding of both economics of history (especially with regards to the other great […]
[…] you can see here and here, I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] you can see here and here, I’m a huge fan of Ronald […]
[…] was no Reagan, to be sure, and the anti-government Congress that took power after the 1994 elections may deserve […]
[…] was no Reagan, to be sure, and the anti-government Congress that took power after the 1994 elections may deserve […]
[…] I periodically share two great Reagan videos, which can be seen here and here, but I also have a couple of inspiring videos of Thatcher in action, which can be viewed here and […]
[…] already expressed my view that Ronald Reagan was the greatest President of the past 100 years. Indeed, his only competition is from Calvin […]
[…] even if we accept that goal, I think Reagan and Bush represented different strains of conservatism. Reagan wanted to shrink the federal government because he viewed Washington as a threat to David’s “harmonious ecosystem.” In […]
[…] I periodically share two great Reagan videos, which can be seen here and here, but I also have a couple of inspiring videos of Thatcher in action, which can be viewed here and […]
[…] and rebounded precisely because politicians didn’t revive the New Deal (and, as you can see from this video, President Reagan understood this bit of economic […]
[…] that’s why it is so rare to find right-wing politicians – such as Reagan and Thatcher – who generally do the right thing. Share and […]
[…] that’s why it is so rare to find right-wing politicians – such as Reagan and Thatcher – who generally do the right thing. Rate this:Share […]
[…] only great president of my lifetime famously said “trust, but verify.” But I don’t even trust the GOP, so I […]
[…] is that Presidents should reduce the burden of government if they want better economic performance. Saint Ronald understood this basic insight, but Barack the Destroyer somehow thinks America will be more […]
[…] of you may be wondering why I would say such a thing. After all, I periodically express my profound admiration for Ronald Reagan (as well as my appreciation for the only other good President of the past 100-plus […]
[…] “the poor poorer.” Sort of the same feeling I get when I watch the Gipper talking about Washington being a “company town” and the “unnecessary and excessive growth of […]
[…] Most people know that Ronald Reagan was an actor before he became a great President. […]
[…] add, that Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum would be any better. Both of them seem closer to Bush than Reagan, so it’s not clear they would make any substantive changes in the burden of the federal […]
[…] video I posted in 2011 is my favorite Reagan clip, but here’s a video that also is very much worth […]
[…] video I posted in 2011 is my favorite Reagan clip, but here’s a video that also is very much worth […]
[…] than my ongoing adulation for Ronald Reagan, occasional praise for Calvin Coolidge, and one post about John F. Kennedy, I don’t have many […]
[…] Most people know that Ronald Reagan was an actor before he became a great President. […]
[…] Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] Most people know that Ronald Reagan was an actor before he became a great President. […]
[…] important to put things in terms ordinary people can understand. That, I believe, is what made Reagan so effective. And it’s what I try to do with this blog (albeit on a much more limited level). […]
[…] teenager when I wanted Jimmy Carter to beat Gerald Ford. I figured that was the best way of getting Ronald Reagan. Rate this: Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
[…] Even the ones we like should be subject to ridicule. Elected officials often get very egotistical because they spend all day being flattered by lobbyists. Our role is to make sure there’s a countervailing force. […]
[…] than my ongoing adulation for Ronald Reagan, occasional praise for Calvin Coolidge, and one post about John F. Kennedy, I don’t have many […]
[…] add, that Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum would be any better. Both of them seem closer to Bush than Reagan, so it’s not clear they would make any substantive changes in the burden of the federal […]
[…] add, that Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum would be any better. Both of them seem closer to Bush than Reagan, so it’s not clear they would make any substantive changes in the burden of the federal […]
[…] than my ongoing adulation for Ronald Reagan, occasional praise for Calvin Coolidge, and one post about John F. Kennedy, I don’t have many […]
[…] a libertarian who became interested in public policy because of Ronald Reagan, it won’t surprise you to know that I’m more of a “right libertarian” than “left […]
[…] a libertarian who became interested in public policy because of Ronald Reagan, it won’t surprise you to know that I’m more of a “right libertarian” than […]
[…] var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true}; When Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] biggovernment on Feb.10, 2012, under BigGovernment When Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] When Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] Data in New World Bank Repoty Shows That Large Public Sector Reduce Economic Growth (Cato Institute) […]
[…] Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in […]
[…] since I’ve already shared a video highlighting Reagan’s deep understanding of both economics and history, let’s watch a few clips showing his sense of […]
[…] what I’d really like is a candidate who could sincerely give these remarks. Or, perhaps even better, make this statement. Rate this: Share […]
[…] even though Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge are two of my heroes, now you know why I don’t consider myself a Republican. […]
[…] even though Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge are two of my heroes, now you know why I don’t consider myself a […]
[…] even though Ronald Reagan and Calvin Coolidge are two of my heroes, now you know why I don’t consider myself a […]
[…] while it doesn’t have the substance and strength of the Gipper’s own words, the message is as appropriate in 2011 and it was in […]
[…] first, I was going to post it and contrast it with this superb Reagan video and compare how one President’s policies kept America mired in a depression while the other […]
[…] his 1976 campaign for the GOP presidential nomination, Ronald Reagan popularized the notion of “welfare queens” who bilked redistribution programs for […]
[…] previous posts, I’ve linked to some great speeches by some great […]
[…] February is the 100th anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s birth and I still haven’t gotten over my man-crush on the Gipper, I figured it would be interesting to […]
[…] February is the 100th anniversary of Ronald Reagan’s birth and I still haven’t gotten over my man-crush on the Gipper, I figured it would be interesting to […]
After reading The Reagan Fraud – and after posted by commenter charlie here I am starting to distrust the Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Phony tax cuts? They are dreaming! Reagan tax cuts were REAL!
But I agree somehow, Reagan was a big spender and communism, perhaps the most murderous regime ever, collapsed under its own weight and not because of Reagn bug spend policies. But austrian theory is clueless in monetary policy, I will explain here how in my opinion austrian theory actually played Keynes game bringing the MASSIVE defeat that keyesianism gave to classical liberalism
I am ultra libertarian, I state. We got a MASSIVE BEATING by Keynes and his friends because the austrian theory is so bad that Keynesianism was less destructive than austrian theory under the Great Depression.
When Mary gives her money to a bank she gives the bank SOME PAPER -a check-, she does not give the bank BILLS AND COINS. The bank does not have all the depositors money in BILLS AND COINS, any beginner student knows that. If, under a panic, Mary is afraid that the bank will go bankrupt then she will ask the bank to give her her money back in BILLS AND COINS and she will put those BILLS AND COINS under her mattress. Under such a situation SOMEONE should print BILLS AND COINS because there is a SUDDEN panicky spectacular surge in the demand for BILLS AND COINS. Giving those terrified depositors their money in BILLS AND COINS is not creating money, that is simply cashing checks -PAPER- with BILLS AND COINS.
If the Central Bank does not print those BILLS AND COINS then there will be MASSIVE bank failures. Giving people BILLS AND COINS in such a situation is not creating money, those BILLS AND COINS do not multiply themselves several times as austrians allege, they just sit under mattresses. And if the Central Bank NEVER PRINTS BILLS AND COINS then disaster will follow.
But austrians talk as if those BILLS AND COINS that Mary demands would multiply themselves creating LOOSE MONEY and “malinvestments” that will auto destruct on a Great Depression. Nonsense! When Mary puts her BILLS AND COINS under her mattress then the bank has even less BILLS AND COINS and the bank can lend even less money making the banking panic situation much worse. BILLS AND COINS are a LIMIT to credit creation, but it is nonsense to allege that BILLS AND COINS created in such an emergency situation will multiply themselves.
If BILLS AND COINS were issued by the private sector then the private sector would have found a way to print all those needed BILLS AND COINS and then to destroy them when people do not wanted anymore so much money in BILLS AND COINS. Austrian “tight money” policies actually turn SAVINGS into a DESTRUCTIVE FORCE under a panic! Not because SAVINGS are bad, but because those monetary theories are SO BAD that they actually turn savings (and investment), THE FOUNDATION OF PROSPERITY, into a DESTRUCTIVE FORCE!
Here http://www.heritage.org/Events/2010/04/The-Dollar-The-Euro-and-the-International-Monetary-Order Supply Sider Robert Mundell explains how the Federal Reserve caused the current crisis by not giving people enough money. He starts by demolishing monetarism but sadly Mundell is a DEEP thinker but a bad communicator. He admits the existence of a housing bubble.
Some very prominent Supply Siders -Arthur Laffer, Alan Reynolds, for instance- made a HUGE valuation error when they said that there was NO HOUSING BUBBLE. It was not difficult to see that there was a housing bubble; for instance , keynesian- co2 demonizing The Economist made a good analysis about the bubble.
Paul Krugman was right when he said that a huge housing bubble would “pop”. Many austrians said that too. But the keynesians being right about the existence of a bubble does not mean that keynesians are right in EVERYTHING or that their theory is not false. EXACTLY The same thing applies to austrian theory. There is nothing in Supply Side theory that forbids the existence of bubbles. Mundell himself, the biggest Supply Sider, admits the existence of a housing bubble.
I think Keynes knew about politics. He knew that in order to give colossal oppressive power and control and $trillions to the political class he needed to DEMONIZE savings; demonizing the ownership of capital has always been central to the left.
And the absurd “tight money” policies used by the FED during the Great Depression -and used again before EVERY recession- where PERFECT for turning SAVINGS into a destructive force. Extreme bad monetary theories turned SAVINGS into a DESTRUCTIVE FORCE under situations of tight money caused by the FED. Keynes only needed to write some NONSENSE theory that demonized savings and he needed to make some good recommendations -like lowering interest rates- and he would defeat Hayek because Hayek was making things EVEN WORSE by recommending MORE of what triggered the Great Depression: TIGHT MONEY.
I have seen that TIGHT MONEY makes bubbles more destructive. The 1987 Dow Jones bubble started under a very short period of TIGHT MONEY and then made “pop” under good monetary policy. No disaster, no recession then. But other bubbles 1929-2000-2007 were made much worse by tight monetary policy and tight monetary policy made their burst disastrous. Loose money can cause a lot of trouble too, but I am not discussing that here (see Mundell for that).
A bubble is a colossal accumulation of capital. Tight money triggers or make bubbles go stronger and then makes them “pop” in disaster. It was easy for Keynes to give the message that capital accumulation is BAD BAD BAD. “Tight money” bad theories produced such sudden accumulations of capital finishing in disaster.
Given such a situation where capital could be seen as a BAD BAD BAD thing, then Keynes only needed to write the utter nonsense “General Theory” that demonized savings and make, based on nonsense, some good recommendations like lowering interest rates, and he would win over classical liberalism and freedom because Hayek was recommending more suicidal “tight money” while Keynes was actually giving some relief. Keynes won such huge a victory because our errors were so colossal, because we played his game.
Sorry for such a long comment. I have been thinking, for years, on this and I am writing a paper on that matter. It will take several months before the paper is finished. Thanks for allowing me to comment.
Not so rosy picture of Reagan’s achievements in economy:
The Reagan Fraud — and After
http://mises.org/daily/5009/The-Reagan-Fraud-and-After
[…] “Happy 100th Birthday to Ronald Reagan,” by Daniel J. Mitchell […]