Like most federal agencies, the Federal Aviation Administration is a costly bureaucracy. Its $16.4 billion budget is enormous, but that is just the direct cost borne by taxpayers. The indirect costs, such as inefficiencies imposed on the air transportation system, also are significant. This has nothing to do with the TSA, by the way. The FAA is responsible for the air traffic control system, things like airport towers and radar systems that tell planes where to fly and when to land.
The Canadians have a much better approach. They privatized their air traffic control system back in the 1990s. So instead of having to rely on a clunky and incompetent government bureaucracy, our neighbors to the north have a private company that is generating very impressive results.
Not that this should be a surprise. Other nations have made remarkable gains through privatization, including Social Security personal accounts in Chile and 30 other nations, education choice in places such as Sweden and the Netherlands, and privatized postal service in Germany.
Reforming government monopolies should be a priority in the United States. Robust economic growth requires more than just low tax rates. It means getting rid of policies that cause resources to be misallocated. Privatization is an unsettling concept for some people, in part because they’ve always assumed certain things should be run by the government. This is why international examples are so important. Canada’s 14 years of experience with a private air traffic control system clearly shows that there are very successful alternatives to inefficient and costly bureaucracies.
Here are some excerpts from a story in Canada’s Financial Post about Canada’s remarkable reform.
A once troubled government asset, the country’s civil air traffic controller was privatized 14 years ago and is now a shining example of how to create a global technology leader out of a hulking government bureaucracy. Nav Canada’s efforts have flights moving more efficiently than ever through the skies above the country. Many of the changes implemented by Nav Canada in recent years have gone unnoticed by the flying public. Certain flights are now shorter than they once were; aircraft no longer circle airports awaiting a runway; descents start further out and planes reach cruising altitudes more quickly; and flights to Asia now spend less time by jaunting over the Arctic than endlessly cruising the Atlantic or Pacific Oceans. …Nav Canada estimates its efforts to modernize the aircraft navigation system in the country since it was privatized in 1996 have cut the fuel bill of airlines flying into Canada and above it by an estimated $1.4-billion collectively… Meantime, Nav Canada has won the respect of airlines for keeping its fees steady, and in some cases, like in 2006, even reducing them when it can. …John Crichton, Nav Canada chief executive, makes no bones about why he thinks his organization has been able to make these improvements and emerge as a global leader. I don’t think there’s any question that the privatization was the best thing that ever happened,” he said. “That really unleashed all the innovation.” …Calin Rovinescu, Air Canada’s chief executive, commended Nav Canada for its efforts to modernize the country’s navigation systems during a speech in Montreal earlier this year, while condemning the United States and the European Union, which still operates as a patchwork of nationalized systems, for their lack of leadership on the issue. Nav Canada also won the International Air Transport Association’s Eagle Award earlier this year for its efforts, in particular its constant consultation with the industry.
My Cato colleague Chris Edwards has more analysis, including a call to private the Federal Aviation Administration as well as some useful links.
Greetings to Instapundit readers. International Liberty is dedicated to the global fight for economic freedom. Peruse this site to your heart’s content. Feedback is always appreciated and come back often.
[…] much to admire about public policy in Canada, including good policies today (private air traffic control and no department of education) and good policies in the past (rigorous spending restraint in the […]
[…] much to admire about public policy in Canada, including good policies today (private air traffic control and no department of education) and good policies in the past (rigorous spending restraint in the […]
[…] much to admire about public policy in Canada, including good policies today (private air traffic control and no department of education) and good policies in the past (rigorous spending restraint in the […]
[…] ideas such as private roads, private mail delivery, private pensions, private money, and private air traffic control. And, as captured by this Reason video, we also like the idea of private […]
[…] think about sectors of our economy run by the government (Postal Service, air traffic control, etc) or heavily regulated and controlled by government (health care, agriculture, […]
[…] – privately provided (see examples for fire protection, money, roads, education, health, air traffic control, […]
[…] are – privately provided (see examples for fire protection, money, roads, education, health, air traffic control, and […]
[…] P.S. Notwithstanding fiscal deterioration under Trudeau, Canada is still a surprisingly pro-market country, ranked #8 in the world. Moreover, it has some very sensible policies involving school choice, welfare reform, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. […]
[…] Sin embargo, en una muestra de equilibrio, noté en mi conclusión que en las últimas décadas, Canadá ha sido «muy sensible» con respecto a los problemas económicos (restricción de gastos, reforma del bienestar, reforma del impuesto de sociedades, rescates bancarios, presupuestos regulatorios, el tratamiento fiscal de ahorro, libertad para elegir la escuela y privatización del control del tráfico aéreo). […]
[…] P.S. In general, Canada is a sensible, market-oriented nation. Indeed, the United States should copy its northern neighbor on issues such as spending restraint, welfare reform, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, school choice, and privatization of air traffic control. […]
[…] in the United States. The federal government, for instance, owns and operates the air traffic control system and the postal service, to cite two big […]
[…] In addition to letting airports escape the TSA, we should copy Canada and achieve better results at lower cost by privatizing air traffic […]
[…] In a display of balance, however, I noted in my conclusion that Canada in recent decades has been “very sensible” with regard to economic issues (spending restraint, welfare reform, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, school choice, and privatization of air traffic control). […]
[…] reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, school choice, and privatization of air traffic control) in a very sensible […]
[…] policies (completely decentralized education and school choice, welfare reform and reduction, privatized air traffic control, etc), it doesn’t make much sense for statists to head […]
[…] Canada is a surprisingly pro-market country, with relatively sensible policies involving spending restraint, welfare reform, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. […]
[…] monopoly power when government takes over a sector of the economy (i.e., air traffic control, Postal Service, Social Security, […]
[…] Canada now has the world’s 5th-freest economy. Welfare reform is just one piece of a very good policy puzzle. There also have been relatively sensible policies involving spending restraint, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. […]
[…] tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] it actually happened. Not only in the United Kingdom, but also in Canada. So advocates of privatization actually got the last […]
[…] corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] tax reform, bank bailouts, regulatory budgeting, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] monopoly power when government takes over a sector of the economy (i.e., air traffic control, Postal Service, Social Security, […]
[…] But we do have a few islands of socialism in the United States. Education is probably the biggest sector of our economy that is dominated by government. The air traffic control system is another unfortunate example. […]
[…] But we do have a few islands of socialism in the United States. Education is probably the biggest sector of our economy that is dominated by government. The air traffic control system is another unfortunate example. […]
[…] But we do have a few islands of socialism in the United States. Education is probably the biggest sector of our economy that is dominated by government. The air traffic control system is another unfortunate example. […]
[…] involving spending restraint, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] spending restraint, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, the tax treatment of saving, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] tax reform, bank bailouts, the tax treatment of saving, regulatory restraint, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] tax reform, bank bailouts, the tax treatment of saving, regulatory restraint, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] tax reform, bank bailouts, the tax treatment of saving, regulatory restraint, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] with spending restraint, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, reducing double taxation, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] with spending restraint, corporate tax reform, bank bailouts, reducing double taxation, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] company in America, a government-run postal service, a government-run retirement system, and a government-run air traffic control system, all things that would function far more efficiently in the private […]
[…] us important lessons on other issues, such as bank bailouts, the tax treatment of savings, and privatization of air traffic control. Heck, Canada even has one of the lowest levels of welfare spending among developed […]
[…] America, it’s because of government. Just think of the Postal Service. Or Social Security. Or the air traffic control system. Those are all things that should be handled by the private sector, but they exist because of […]
[…] it’s because of government. Just think of the Postal Service. Or Social Security. Or the air traffic control system. Those are all things that should be handled by the private sector, but they exist because of […]
[…] progressives used to say that air traffic control system needs to be a government monopoly, but the Canadians privatized their system and now have more safety and […]
[…] rail company in America, a government-run postal service, a government-run retirement system, and a government-run air traffic control system, all of which would be better in the private sector. And I’m sure Obama, Sanders, and many […]
Not so fast. Huge dollars flow from ticket taxes and from the sale of fuel to private aviation. In the private market, which is a HUGE boom to communities and part of our national infrastructure, AND creates many pilots who go professional, the ease of using the system that the fuel taxes pay for is critical to safety. Also due to the shear physical size of the US, many small companies use aviation to reach destinations that are not on scheduled routes. Change the simplicity of buying a gallon of fuel to receiving a bill from every contact point in a flight, take off, in flight services, landing and weather services etc. and you will find many pilots will just not use the system. Human nature does not change.
Fuel tax is a use based system already – and easy. You want to take THOSE dollars and give it to a private company to manage ATC – OK. But that is NOT how Canada or the EU works. It is VERY complex to those who do not have commercial flight departments like the airlines. It is ridiculously expense and cumbersome to fly in the UK and Europe. So therefore, you have very little of it. Want to kill General Aviation in the US? Just pull off this stunt.
And one previous writer already said, it is the FAA that causes more pain to aviation than the Air Traffic Control System. Magnetos are still required in small planes. 1930 technology, as one example.
[…] to fulfill my Golden Rule, imposing genuine fiscal restraint during the 1990s. The Canadians even privatized their air traffic control system, which is a lot more than can be said for the United […]
[…] already written on this topic, citing some good analysis from Canada’s Financial Post, and the evidence is overwhelming that the private system in Canada works much better than the […]
[…] already written on this topic, citing some good analysis from Canada’s Financial Post, and the evidence is overwhelming that the private system in Canada works much better than the […]
[…] progressives used to say that air traffic control system needs to be a government monopoly, but our Canadian neighbors privatized their system and now have more safety and […]
[…] But I wasn’t totally shocked by the news because Canada has been lowering tax rates, reducing the burden of government spending, and taking other steps to make its economy more competitive. […]
[…] progressives used to say that air traffic control system needs to be a government monopoly, but our Canadian neighbors privatized their system and now have more safety and […]
[…] a much-needed lesson for Paul Krugman), and I’ve also praised our northern neighbors for privatizing their air traffic control system and opposing global bank […]
[…] By allowing the private sector to grow faster than the government, Canada has also been able to implement big tax cuts. Heck, they even privatized their air traffic control system. […]
[…] By allowing the private sector to grow faster than the government, Canada has also been able to implement big tax cuts. Heck, they even privatized their air traffic control system. […]
[…] But I wasn’t totally shocked by the news because Canada has been lowering tax rates, reducing the burden of government spending, and taking other steps to make its economy more competitive. […]
[…] But I wasn’t totally shocked by the news because Canada has been lowering tax rates, reducing the burden of government spending, and taking other steps to make its economy more competitive. […]
[…] a much-needed lesson for Paul Krugman), and I’ve also praised our northern neighbors for privatizing their air traffic control system and opposing global bank […]
[…] a much-needed lesson for Paul Krugman), and I’ve also praised our northern neighbors for privatizing their air traffic control system and opposing global bank […]
In G Edward Griffin’s book on the Federal Reserve, he says that the Fed is private , not Federal at all. Our current Federal Reserve System is not the first; it is our fourth one.
The first three Federal Reserves were “taken down”-so why not end this Fed?
[…] progressives used to say that air traffic control system needs to be a government monopoly, but our Canadian neighbors privatized their system and now have more safety and […]
[…] restraint (relative to the U.S., at least) is not the only positive development. Canada also has privatized its air traffic control system and fought against European schemes for bank taxes. No wonder Canada now ranks above America in […]
I believe there was a time when ATC in this country was all private. Back to the Future.
The simple answer to the high cost of the FAA: AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS
When Ronald Reagan (rightfully) fired 10,000 Air Traffic Controllers in 1981 for going on strike, the FAA failed to plan ahead for the replacement of the mass concurrent retirement of all the Controllers who were hired after the strike between 1981-1985.
In fact, the FAA had a hiring FREEZE in place for almost all of the 1990′s which caused a vacuum in the training pipeline and prevented sufficient replacement for the aging staff many of whom were eligible or nearing eligibility for retirement.
Top that off with the FAA Administration actively seeking to piss off the ATC union by withholding negotiating a new contract at its expiration in 2006, thereby causing most all ATC’ers who were eligible to retire, to do exactly that.
These two FAILURES by the FAA Administration caused (an is still causing) a massive under staffing of qualified, trained Air Traffic Controllers, many of whom now work 6 days a week due to forced (expensive) overtime, and to make matters worse there are not enough trainers to train the new trainees which generally takes from 1-3 years depending on the airport where you work.
The cost of these failures by the FAA management is that when Obama took office he quickly had Ray LaHood (by proxy of Jane Garvey the former FAA Administrator under Clinton)negotiate a new contract with the ATC Unions (because naturally they had backed Obama’s campaign so he owed them). And, since the FAA had backed itself into a corner by causing a staffing shortage, it had little choice but to cave to the unions demands.
A new pay structure was implemented which included a three year gradual increase of something like 10% the 1st year, 8% the 2nd years, etc. and almost ALL Air Traffic Controllers (15K of them? Maybe more) now easily break the $150K mark.
Full disclosure, I work for the FAA but I no longer work as an Air Traffic Controller and I am NOT a union member.
Privatizing “ATC” (incorrect use of term, but will do) sounds like a good idea in theory, for a libertarian anyway, but every proposal I saw thus far was basically a government handout airlines and murder of general private aviation. For that reason AOPA and EAA mounted opposition every time it was brought to the table. As a pilot, I would not mind paying a user’s fee, unless I fly in class E or G. Heck it might be the best money I ever spend *IF* it actually reduces the excess regulation (and reduces our government’s spending). But it seems never on the table. I wonder why!
Cost effectiveness
First company replaced 11 FAA ATC with 5 private ATC. The pilots raved at our increased efficency, little delays & better service.
Operations should not be dollar rated as the reason for ATC is survivial, err make that safety.
I have worked all FAA facilities; radio, ARTCC, Non-radar tower/CST, radar approach/tower and for 2 private ATC firms.
.
The ARTCC will remain FAA for a longtime as its just too big for undustry to absorb.
.
Level 1 towers will soon be 100%, level 2 soon after. It might take decades to absorb 3 & 4s.
.
The biggest mistake private ATC makes are management. They are making the same mistake the FAA did in ’81 with their on-site management.
The first company hired an ATC failure as the head resulting in NO understanding how facilities worked
An additional mistake, the secound company I worked for, was PC. They selected a black to hire all personnel and then 80% of the hires were black with no others in midlevel management.
.
Its going to take awhile to correct but I believe its the future.
[…] DAN MITCHELL: Why Can’t We Copy those Radical Free-Market Canadians and Privatize the Air Traffic Control System… […]
There are other ways to enjoy cost savings apart from privatizing the ATC function of the FAA. For example, on a recent trip, according to the rules, I had to navigate only by using an FAA-approved radio that cost about $3,000, that gives me guidance (according to the FAA rules themselves) of plus or minus 4.5 miles either side of the center line of flight.
I have a $500 GPS unit, but since it is not officially FAA approved, even though it is accurate to plus/minus 50 feet either side of the center line, I am forbidden from using it to navigate.
The airplane originally came with two very bright incandescent landing lights. Later GE came out with an exact replacement, but using a halogen element. Even though the original bulb lasts only 25 hours (or about 50 takeoff/landing cycles), some FAA field offices have ruled it to be illegal to install the halogen-based replacement, even though it is brighter and lasts 4x as long.
On my last annual inspection I was charged for one hour of mechanics time for chasing down a single sheet of paper that formalized the approval of the installation of a single metal pin in the track of the pilot’s seat. The pin had been installed some 20 years ago by an unknown mechanic and both I an my mechanic faced a fine should an inspector discover we lacked the paperwork for it.
The radio shop I used has over a hundred man hours in getting the FAA to approve the permanent installation of a single piece of radio equipment in a local police helicopter.
It is endless, but that is the nature of the beast and no amount of privatizing it will change those aspects of it. Thus, I say that the anticipated savings are at least somewhat a mirage.
While on the surface privatizing the ATC function of the FAA may seem to be a good move, yet there are other factors to consider.
First, it is a matter of law and court rulings that access to air navigation is to be shared equally by all users. This article was written from the standpoint of how the airlines enjoy efficiencies, yet there are a host of other users such as air ambulances, charter flights, pipeline patrols and bush pilots.
The FAA and ATC are one-size-fits-all. This has been the battle for many years. Different classes of users only need certain services, yet the Leviathan bureaucracy raises costs that when the services are privatized to “save” money, the bill will be unaffordable for large numbers of aircraft operators.
For example, a nearby airport has a tower and even 10 years ago, when you divided its total budget by the number of “operations” (take offs and landings), it amounted to $19 each. If I used that airport at night, alone, which I sometimes used to do on a regular basis, under a privatized system, they should rightly charge me at least $38 for a round trip, even if all I did was take off, circle the field and land.
Who would drive their car if it cost $38 every time you went to the store for using a public road, even late at night when nobody else was around?
The problem with privatization is how easily it leads politicians to the next step: allocating costs among the various user groups. It destroys the user groups who have costs for services imposed on them that they are not allowed to decline but don’t use. If you want to destroy one more American industry, general aviation, privatizing air traffic control and then allocating the costs is the quickest way possible.
It might be wise to check with some folks inside Nav Canada, as well as the operators in Canada (outside the airlines) to see if it’s been such a wild success.
As far as privatizing the rest of the FAA, that should be approached with some caution. Make a comparison to the European way of doing what the FAA does, and you’ll see that the FAA is actually pretty efficient at some things. The UK killed their aviation industry and the Europeans are about to do the same thing. The FAA’s mandate of ‘the minimum legislation necessary for safety’ is a wonderful way to go (not perfect, but better than any other way).
“Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem.” –
— Ronald Reagan
so where is the room for political corruption? The US is now
Chicago politics writ large.