Archive for December 2nd, 2010

A Dan Mitchell doubleheader this evening.

I’ll be on Larry Kudlow’s CNBC show around 7:40 or 7:45 and Judge Napolitano’s Fox Business News show in the following hour, though all I was told is that my segments will be sometime after 8:15.

Read Full Post »

Somebody emailed me this t-shirt. Rather amusing, but fairness requires me to suggest two changes, as explained underneath.

First, the writing on the t-shirt should be expanded to state “January 20, 2001-January 20, 2013.” In other words, people who dislike Obama’s reflexive statism should be just as disappointed and upset about what Bush did to make government bigger as they are about what Obama is doing to make government bigger.

Second, the t-shirt should include “…and the start of another” as a disclaimer since the GOPers jockeying for the 2012 nomination seem to be a dismal gaggle of big-government types who will continue the bad policies of Bush and Obama.

Other than that, a great t-shirt!

Read Full Post »

The fiscal disintegration of Europe is bad news, though I confess to a bit of malicious glee every time I read about welfare states such as Greece, Ireland, and Portugal getting to the point where they no longer have the ability to borrow enough money to finance their bloated public sectors. This I-told-you-so attitude is not very mature on my part, but at least one hopes that American politicians will learn the right lessons.

Even though this is a big issue, I have not written much about the topic, in part because I don’t have much to add to my original post about this issue back in February. All the arguments I made then are still true, particularly about the moral hazard of bailouts and the economic damage of rewarding excessive government. So why bother repeating myself, particularly since this is an issue for Europeans to solve (or, as is their habit, to make worse)?

Unfortunately, it appears that all of us need to pay closer attention to this issue. The Obama Administration apparently thinks American taxpayers should subsidize European profligacy. Here’s a passage from a Reuters report about a potential bailout for Europe via the IMF.

The United States would be ready to support the extension of the European Financial Stability Facility via an extra commitment of money from the International Monetary Fund, a U.S. official told Reuters on Wednesday. “There are a lot of people talking about that. I think the European Commission has talked about that,” said the U.S. official, commenting on enlarging the 750 billion euro ($980 billion) EU/IMF European stability fund. “It is up to the Europeans. We will certainly support using the IMF in these circumstances.” “There are obviously some severe market problems,” said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “In May, it was Greece. This is Ireland and Portugal. If there is contagion that’s a huge problem for the global economy.”

This issue will be an interesting test for the GOP. I think it’s safe to say that the Tea Party movement didn’t elect Republicans so they could expand the culture of bailouts – especially if that means handouts for profligate European governments. Some people will argue that American taxpayers aren’t at risk because this would be a bailout from the IMF instead of the Treasury. But that’s an absurd and dishonest assertion. The United States is the largest “shareholder” in that international bureaucracy, and there’s no way the IMF can get more involved without American support.

Read Full Post »

%d bloggers like this: