My Cato colleague Izzy Santa explains why a free-market approach is the key to better schools.
School Choice Video Shows Why Government Education Monopoly Should Be Disbanded
February 9, 2010 by Dan Mitchell
Posted in Education, School Choice | Tagged Education, School Choice | 154 Comments
154 Responses
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
-
Join 4,842 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Pages
- 100 Tragic Years of Communism
- Bureaucrat Hall of Fame
- Bureaucrat Humor (pending)
- Collectivism Humor
- Five Things About Me
- Government in Cartoons and Images
- Gun Control Satire
- Honest Leftists
- Libertarian Humor
- Libertarian Quandaries
- Mocking Europeans
- Moocher Hall of Fame
- Poverty Hucksters
- Sex and Government
- Victims of Government
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
- Big Government Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Class warfare Competitiveness Constitution Corporate income tax Corporate tax Corruption Crime Cronyism Debt Deficit Dependency Donald Trump Economics Education England Entitlements Europe Fiscal Crisis Fiscal Policy Flat Tax Free Markets Government-run healthcare Government intervention Government Spending Government stupidity Government Thuggery Government waste Gun control Health Care Health Reform Higher Taxes Humor International bureaucracy IRS Jobs Joe Biden Keynesian Economics Laffer Curve Libertarianism Liberty Local government News Appearance Obama Obamacare OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Political Humor Politics Poverty Redistribution Regulation Republicans Socialism Social Security States Statism stimulus Supply-side economics Taxation Tax avoidance Tax Competition Tax Haven Tax Increase Tax Increases Tax Reform Trade Unemployment United Kingdom Value-Added Tax VAT Welfare Welfare State
Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- Academic Bias
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Arizona
- Asset Forfeiture
- Atlas Shrugged
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Basic Income
- Belgium
- Bernanke
- Bernie Sanders
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Boris Johnson
- Botswana
- Brain drain
- Brazil
- Brexit
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- Buttigieg
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- Carbon Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- Cayman Islands
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Charity
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Civil Disobedience
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Colorado
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Connecticut
- Constitution
- Convergence
- Coolidge
- Corbyn
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative Destruction
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Demographics
- Denmark
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Donald Trump
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economic Rankings
- Economics
- Education
- EITC
- Election
- Elitism
- Elizabeth Warren
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Equality
- Estonia
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- European Union
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- FATCA
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Gas Tax
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gold Standard
- Gordon Brown
- Government Inefficiency
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Green New Deal
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hillary Clinton
- Homeschooling
- Hong Kong
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hungary
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- India
- Industrial Policy
- Inequality
- Inflation
- Infrastructure
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Iowa
- Iran
- Ireland
- IRS
- Israel
- Italy
- Janet Yellen
- Japan
- JCT
- Jimmy Carter
- Jobs
- Joe Biden
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Jury Nullification
- Justin Trudeau
- Kamala Harris
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Licensing
- Liechtenstein
- Liz Truss
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Macron
- Mandate
- Margaret Thatcher
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Massachusetts
- Media Bias
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Mexico
- Michael Bloomberg
- Michigan
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Minnesota
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Mitchell's Theorem
- Mobility
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New York
- New Zealand
- News Appearance
- Nixon
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama
- Ocasio-Cortez
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- Panama
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paul Krugman
- Paul Ryan
- Paulson
- Payroll Taxation
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Poland
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Pope Francis
- Portugal
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Productivity
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Choice
- Public Goods
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rand Paul
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Rent Control
- Republicans
- Roads
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Rule of Law
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- Savings
- School Choice
- Scotland
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Capital
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Societal Capital
- Softball
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- Spending Cap
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- TABOR
- Taiwan
- TARP
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Loophole
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Theresa May
- Third party payer
- Thomas Sowell
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- Transportation
- TSA
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- Vaping
- VAT
- Venezuela
- Video
- Virginia
- Vouchers
- Wages
- Wagner's Law
- Walter Williams
- Warren Harding
- Waste
- Wealth Tax
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- World Health Organization
- World Trade Organization
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
- Zimbabwe
- Zoning
[…] School choice means that there will be another big reason to move to the libertarian-friendly Sunshine State. […]
[…] School choice means that there will be another big reason to move to the libertarian-friendly Sunshine State. […]
[…] School choice means that there will be another big reason to move to the libertarian-friendly Sunshine State. […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] I’ll end by noting that I’m very excited that school choice is beginning to sweep the […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] was back in 2010 when I first shared a video about school choice. We’ve enjoyed a lot of […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] been pontificating in favor of school choice from the early days of this column, in part because I believe in the benefits of competition and in part because […]
[…] The case for school choice is very straightforward. […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] can blame the natural inefficiency of monopolies. You can blame teacher unions. Heck, you can blame sunspots or space aliens for all I […]
[…] can blame the natural inefficiency of monopolies. You can blame teacher unions. Heck, you can blame sunspots or space aliens for all I […]
[…] He’s right, but he should focus his ire on his leftist friends and colleagues. They’re the ones (including the NAACP!) standing in the proverbial schoolhouse door and blocking the right kind of education reform. […]
[…] was back in 2010 when I first shared a video about school choice. We’ve enjoyed a lot of […]
[…] was back in 2010 when I first shared a video about school choice. We’ve enjoyed a lot of progress since then, […]
[…] The case for school choice is very straightforward. […]
[…] The “city’s greatest needs” are replacing the failed government education monopoly with school choice and reducing the excessive pensions for over-compensated government bureaucrats – such as the […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] The case for school choice is very straightforward. […]
[…] Or we can learn from the evidence and harness the benefits of competition and innovation with school choice. […]
[…] a big fan of school choice, you can understand why this bit of whining and grousing from the National Education Association is […]
[…] been writing about the benefits of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] Or we can learn from the evidence and harness the benefits of competition and innovation with school choice. […]
[…] Or we can learn from the evidence and harness the benefits of competition and innovation with school choice. […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] find that educational freedom is 2 percent of a state’s score. Given the importance of school choice (for both individual education outcomes and national economic competitiveness), I wonder if that […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] The “city’s greatest needs” are replacing the failed government education monopoly with school choice and reducing the excessive pensions for over-compensated government bureaucrats – such as the […]
[…] The case for school choice is very straightforward. […]
[…] case for school choice is very […]
[…] P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video. […]
[…] P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video. […]
[…] P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video. […]
[…] It goes without saying that shutting down the Department of Education would be a positive step. But that’s only a partial solution. We’ll explore the real answer tomorrow. […]
[…] P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video. […]
[…] P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video. […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining the benefits of school […]
[…] P.S. Here’s a video explaining why school choice is better than a government-run monopoly. […]
[…] P.S. It’s worth pointing out that this column is an attack on teacher unions, not teachers. For what it’s worth, the main argument for school choice is that it would be better for students. That being said, good teachers also would prosper in a choice-based system. […]
[…] P.S. It’s worth pointing out that this column is an attack on teacher unions, not teachers. For what it’s worth, the main argument for school choice is that it would be better for students. That being said, good teachers also would prosper in a choice-based system. […]
[…] P.S. Here’s a video explaining why school choice is better than a government-run monopoly. […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] It goes without saying that shutting down the Department of Education would be a positive step. But that’s only a partial solution. We’ll explore the real answer tomorrow. […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] The “city’s greatest needs” are replacing the failed government education monopoly with school choice and reducing the excessive pensions for over-compensated government bureaucrats – […]
[…] been writing about the benefits of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more […]
[…] been writing about the benefits of school choice for a long time, largely because government schools are becoming ever-more expensive while produced […]
[…] a huge fan of school choice. Simply stated, private schools deliver far superior results for children compared to costly and […]
[…] before we had a pandemic, I wasn’t a fan of the government school […]
[…] This issue is getting more heated, as this Reason video explains. […]
[…] P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this video. […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] It goes without saying that shutting down the Department of Education would be a positive step. But that’s only a partial solution. We’ll explore the real answer tomorrow. […]
[…] It goes without saying that shutting down the Department of Education would be a positive step. But that’s only a partial solution. We’ll explore the real answer tomorrow. […]
[…] P.P.P.S. If you want to learn more about school choice, I recommend this column and this video. […]
[…] get better results if school budgets are distributed to parents so they can pick from schools that compete for their kids (and […]
[…] would be a positive step. But that’s only a partial solution. We’ll explore the real answer […]
[…] the way, I’m disappointed that I forgot to mention in my final soundbite that school choice would be a very specific and very effective way of helping poor people climb the ladder of […]
[…] some very important initiatives, including votes on Colorado’s flat tax, Arizona’s school choice system, and a carbon tax in the state of […]
[…] Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, routinely send their kids to private school while fighting to deny school choice for […]
[…] This is one of the reasons I support school choice (and also object to throwing more money into government schools). Parents are far […]
[…] This is one of the reasons I support school choice (and also object to throwing more money into government schools). Parents are far […]
[…] is to explain that I am a strong supporter of markets as the method to get high-quality roads, schools, and […]
[…] Medicaid program, Arizona voters sided with teacher unions over children and said no to expanded school choice, and voters in two states increased the minimum […]
[…] second-most important referendum is probably the battle over school choice in Arizona. Here’s how Reason characterizes that […]
[…] The only solution is school choice, as explained in this video. […]
[…] is that we rely on government monopolies that are captured by special interests. We need school choice so that competitive forces can be unleashed to generate better results. There’s strong […]
[…] education is that we rely on government monopolies that are captured by special interests. We need school choice so that competitive forces can be unleashed to generate better results. There’s strong […]
[…] up government school monopolies and harness the power of the market by giving parents and students genuine school choice. For what it’s worth, there’s strong evidence that choice produces good outcomes in the […]
[…] I’d be delighted to see a massive school choice initiative, which would benefit students from all backgrounds, but I strongly suspect black kids would […]
[…] how school choice delivers better education results. Which is what everyone should expect since competition is superior to monopoly. Well, as explained in another Wall Street Journal editorial, it also generates superior results at […]
[…] wound up picking “neutral” because I want universal school choice, which would produce better-than-adequate education, but I also don’t like the notion that […]
[…] Maybe (especially given the shocking lack of results after record levels of staffing and funding) we should break up the government school monopoly and let parents choose better-quality schools. […]
[…] Which is what everyone should expect since competition is superior to monopoly. […]
[…] “Juan concludes his column with a plea for diversity, innovation, and competition… …He’s right, but he should focus his ire on his leftist friends and colleagues. They’re the ones (including the NAACP!) standing in the proverbial schoolhouse door and blocking the right kind of education reform.” […]
[…] NAACP!) standing in the proverbial schoolhouse door and blocking the right kind of education reform. P.S. This is a depressing post, so let’s close with a bit of humor showing […]
[…] He’s right, but he should focus his ire on his leftist friends and colleagues. They’re the ones (including the NAACP!) standing in the proverbial schoolhouse door and blocking the right kind of education reform. […]
[…] education than any other nation and gets mediocre results . That’s probably mostly due to the inefficient monopoly structureof elementary and secondary […]
[…] that’s critical for the nation and vitally important for minority […]
[…] that’s critical for the nation and vitally important for minority […]
[…] that’s critical for the nation and vitally important for minority […]
[…] that’s critical for the nation and vitally important for minority […]
[…] education than any other nation and gets mediocre results . That’s probably mostly due to the inefficient monopoly structure of elementary and secondary […]
[…] just maybe, it’s time to shut down the Department of Education on the federal level and to encourage school choice on the state and local […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] more information on the overall issue of school choice, I strongly recommend this video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity […]
[…] this video to get more […]
[…] just maybe, it’s time to shut down the Department of Education on the federal level and to encourage school choice on the state and local […]
[…] more information on the overall issue of school choice, I strongly recommend this video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity […]
[…] sufficiently libertarian because there’s an even better solution. Why not simply engage in real education reform, give all families vouchers, and then let them choose schools on the basis of many different […]
[…] of the status quo used to claim that school choice was a radical idea, but it’s hard to defend that position since nations such as Sweden, Chile, […]
[…] just maybe, it’s time to shut down the Department of Education on the federal level and toencourage school choice on the state and local […]
[…] just maybe, it’s time to shut down the Department of Education on the federal level and to encourage school choice on the state and local […]
[…] just maybe, it’s time to shut down the Department of Education on the federal level and to encourage school choice on the state and local […]
[…] The ultimate answer is to end the government education monopoly and shift to a system based on choice and competition. […]
[…] Maybe, just maybe, it’s time to put kids first. Perhaps we should discard the Bush-Obama approach of centralization and spending and instead choose a better path. […]
[…] Maybe, just maybe, it’s time to put kids first. Perhaps we should discard the Bush-Obama approach of centralization and spending and instead choose a better path. […]
[…] P.S. Here’s a video explaining why school choice is better than a government-run monopoly. […]
[…] Yet another argument for school choice. […]
[…] question: Do we want to maintain and perpetuate a failed government school monopoly, or should we implement school choice to get better results and less political […]
[…] Or, if you like government, but at least want good results, imagine the good things that would have happened if state and local governments shifted $180 billion from the failed school monopoly into genuine school choice programs. […]
[…] a big fan of school choice. If we bust up the government education monopoly and create a competitive education market, we’ll […]
[…] a big fan of school choice. If we bust up the government education monopoly and create a competitive education market, […]
[…] more information on the overall issue of school choice, I strongly recommend this video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity […]
[…] more information on the overall issue of school choice, I strongly recommend this video from the Center for Freedom and Prosperity […]
[…] Or, if you like government, but at least want good results, imagine the good things that would have happened if state and local governments shifted $180 billion from the failed school monopoly into genuine school choice programs. […]
[…] The “city’s greatest needs” are replacing the failed government education monopoly with school choice and reducing the excessive pensions for over-compensated government bureaucrats – such as the […]
[…] greatest needs” are replacing the failed government education monopoly with school choice and reducing the excessive pensions for over-compensated government bureaucrats – such as the […]
[…] What makes this situation so tragic is that we have strong proof that we could get much better outcomes by shifting to a system of school choice. […]
[…] from a policy perspective, we need to bust up the government school monopoly and implement school choice. And not because suburban kids are being victimized by political correctness. That’s a nuisance, […]
[…] from a policy perspective, we need to bust up the government school monopoly and implement school choice. And not because suburban kids are being victimized by political correctness. That’s a […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining why school choice is better than a government-run […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining why school choice is better than a government-run […]
[…] Now, if we can just figure out how to expand school choice in America… […]
A major difference in education is aspiration of pupil, parent and teacher . Too many teachers in the state education system use poverty as an excuse for low aspiration which tends to produce low results. If one looks at cultures such as India, Sri Lanka and other parts of Asia high standards are produced in despite of poverty and large class sizes because of self -discipline, high levels of concentration and high levels of aspiration from parents, pupils, and teachers.
Subjects such as maths, languages ,history, geography and drawing can be taught in run down buildings with only basic equipment. In applied maths one can teach the mathematical aspects of physics, chemistry, biology and engineering. After all Newton developed many of his theories in a farm house!
After all thge RC Church has history attracting poor children and producing great scholars, especially the Jesuits . A convent education in India is still considered an asset for women.
A major problem is many state schools is that many teachers are not bright enough to teach pupils to high enough levels to enter top universities especially in subjects such as maths,engineering,music, science, languages( European, Classical and Asian) except for such scools as the Brooklyn High.
Able pupils in maths, ballet and music often need high quality teachers from the age of 6. Able maths students at school have often attained university entry standard by the age of 16-17. Shakespeare was taught at Grammar School ( taught Latin and Greek) and left by the age of 16.
I would suggest many pupils in Grammar and Private schools in the UK by the age of 16 were achieving higher scholastic standards by 1600 than many pupils in inner city schools in the USA and UK in 2012 because they received a more rigorous education and expectations were higher. A gentleman knowsLatin and a scholar knows Latin and Greek. If one looks at the a the mid 18 C ,it would be expected than an educated member of the middle classes knew maths, Latin, Greek and French. A major cause of the success of the USA and Industrial revolution was the high standard of education of the Quakers and other Protestant Groups. Look at the education of those who founded the Ivy League Universities and who wrote the Declaration of Indpendence and compare with the average teacher in a state school.
[…] And the real moral of the story is that we need to break up the government-run education monopoly and allow school choice. […]
[…] Maybe the bigger lesson (especially given the shocking lack of results after record levels of staffing and funding) is that we should break up the government school monopoly and let parents choose better-quality schools? […]
[…] of the status quo used to claim that school choice was a radical idea, but it’s hard to defend that position since nations such as Sweden, Chile, […]
[…] Here’s a video explaining why school choice is better than a government-run […]
[…] But after reading this story, I realize that I was being wimpy. These stories show that the time has come to end the government school monopoly. […]
[…] of the status quo used to claim that school choice was a radical idea, but it’s hard to defend that position since nations such as Sweden, Chile, […]
[…] Now, if we can just figure out how to expand school choice in America… […]
[…] if we can just figure out how to expand school choice in America… Rate this:Share […]
[…] departments of the federal government, including Housing and Urban Development, Transportation, Education, and […]
[…] of the status quo used to claim that school choice was a radical idea, but it’s hard to defend that position since nations such as […]
[…] this video looks at the broader issue of school choice. Rate this: Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike […]
The presentation doesn’t account for a number of socio economic variables. Nonetheless, anyone who thinks that the government does much of ANYTHING better than the private sector needs to have his head checked.
[…] The right approach, of course, is to get the federal government out of the education business completely, and then disband government-imposed school monopolies at the state and local level – as explained in this video. […]
[…] should be substantially cut, including elimination of departments such as HUD, Transportation, Education, Agriculture, etc), but if maintained over a lengthy period will eliminate all red ink. More […]
[…] should be substantially cut, including elimination of departments such as HUD, Transportation, Education, Agriculture, etc), but if maintained over a lengthy period will eliminate all red ink. More […]
[…] should be substantially cut, including elimination of departments such as HUD, Transportation, Education, Agriculture, etc), but if maintained over a lengthy period will eliminate all red ink. More […]
whooooaaa wait a second. It is a fallacy to say, “the answer is simple,” and then to show one graph and say “see?” The answer is not necessarily complicated, but even a non-economics person from the CATO Institute (or someone speaking on non-economic terms) ought to understand the difference between correlation and causation. Economics, policy, math, and politics majors have heard it a million times (and patiently nod their heads) when a non-statistician tries to tell them that correlation does not equal causality. It gets annoying. And yet someone from an organization that is supposed to be filled with smart people shows a chart of test scores, where private school students perform better than public school students, and surmises that the result is “simple” – private education is better because it allows competition. Any econometrician can point out what’s wrong with that. But so can any informed ordinary citizen. How do we know that there are not exogenous factors? In other words, maybe poor(er) people who can’t afford private school work longer hours and thus cannot be there to help or encourage education in the household. Perhaps they themselves don’t see the value in an education, and thus don’t encourage it. Perhaps they can’t afford private tutors, extra books, and other things that can help a child’s test scores. Maybe the teachers in a private school aren’t state-monitored as tightly and inflate their students’ test scores. Maybe there is a genetic factor involved, and smarter people make more money, allowing their kids to go to a private school – and yet it is the genes and not the schooling that makes their scores “higher.” I really cringe when a think tank, even one with a transparently open agenda or political leaning, puts out overly simplistic or fallacious evidence like this. There are a thousand better ways to give arguments in favor of a free market, or of a voucher system. But please don’t show a chart like you do at the beginning and say that the answer is obvious.
[…] more important, school choice would give poor kids a much better education, thus increasing their ability to achieve the American […]
[…] more important, school choice would give poor kids a much better education, thus increasing their ability to achieve the American […]
[…] time they were in power. The created a new entitlement program for prescription drugs. They further centralized education with the no-bureaucrat-left-behind legislation. They undid the positive reforms of the 1990s with central-planning subsidies and controls for […]
[…] time they were in power. The created a new entitlement program for prescription drugs. They further centralized education with the no-bureaucrat-left-behind legislation. They undid the positive reforms of the 1990s with central-panning subsidies and controls for […]
[…] time they were in power. The created a new entitlement program for prescription drugs. They further centralized education with the no-bureaucrat-left-behind legislation. They undid the positive reforms of the 1990s with central-panning subsidies and controls for […]
[…] time they were in power. The created a new entitlement program for prescription drugs. They further centralized education with the no-bureaucrat-left-behind legislation. They undid the positive reforms of the 1990s with central-panning subsidies and controls for […]