A sportswriter at NBA.com explains how higher tax rates will make it even more attractive for professional athletes to sign with teams from zero-income tax states such as Florida and Texas. This is good news if you cheer for the Miami Dolphins or Texas Rangners. But if you support teams from high-tax states, you should be very upset that greedy politicians are making it more likely that your favorite franchise will be at a competitive disadvantage:
Bad News if You Root for the New York Yankees, Los Angeles Lakers, or New England Patriots
July 30, 2009 by Dan Mitchell
With increasing taxes geared to the wealthy and the Bush tax cuts also coming off the books, it may be that the low tax states like Florida and Texas begin to have a big advantage over higher tax states when it comes to NBA free agents. …Could, in the end, the biggest barrier to the Bulls attracting a major free agent next summer like Dwyane Wade be the health care legislation now being debated in Washington? …The answer is taxes. The closest anyone seems to a plan now to pay for the changes is to tax the so-called rich. That would include just about every player in the NBA. I know we’re not supposed to feel sorry for rich people and assume they have so much that giving up more doesn’t matter. It does, just as comfortable people in the middle class with two cars and a nice health club membership don’t want to pay more taxes, either, even though they can afford to. So I contacted a tax expert in Chicago, Noel Wilner, president of CBIZ MHM, an accounting and tax advisory company, and asked him to do some calculations. The assumption was single tax payer, the 2011 tax rates when the presumed five percent health care surtax would go into effect with the higher rates that year, salaries of $5.5 million, which is about the NBA average, and $17 million, which would be a high earner like Wade and no deductions. …The total tax for a $5,500,000 salary and an Illinois resident is $2,568,412. This is made up of $2,142,412 of federal income tax, $261,000 of health care tax and $165,000 of Illinois tax. A Florida resident will have the same federal and health care tax but no state income tax ($165,000). The total tax for a salary of $17,000,000 will be $8,088,412. That is made up of $6,696,412 of federal income tax, $882,000 of health care tax and $510,000 of Illinois tax. A Florida resident will have all the same tax except no state tax ($510,000). In addition, Wilner notes, there is typically an allocation to other states where the games are actually played. But there should be at least a savings of 50% of the state tax for being a Florida resident as 50% of the games are home games. I know almost $9 million after taxes is a lot of money. But with the government adding on another half million dollars penalty to pay for health care and who knows how much more down the road as the rich seem to be set up as the villains in this health care debate, suddenly hanging onto more than $500,000 in state tax may sound appealing. So perhaps someone like Wade sees he can resign with his own team for an extra year under NBA rules and then get that much more in tax benefit, and maybe the money starts becoming too big to decide to leave? With increasing taxes geared to the wealthy and the Bush tax cuts also coming off the books, it may be that the low tax states like Florida and Texas begin to have a big advantage over higher tax states. And then seemingly making it even less appealing to go to a ridiculously high tax state like New York.
[…] But it presumably means that teams in states like California and New York have to overcome a built-in disadvantage. […]
[…] But it presumably means that teams in states like California and New York have to overcome a built-in disadvantage. […]
[…] true in the United States. And it’s true […]
[…] close with an observation. Way back in 2009, I speculated that high tax rates could actually hurt the performance of teams in high-tax […]
[…] close with an observation. Way back in 2009, I speculated that high tax rates could actually hurt the performance of teams in high-tax […]
Dan–
(I realize that this is a very old post, so commenting is kind of pointless….)
It would be extremely interesting to consider how the agent of a major league baseball pitcher might play a different version of “Moneyball.” Since a starting pitcher typically pitches one game out of four, a clever agent could (at least in theory) save his client a substantial tax burden by pressuring the team’s manager to adjust his pitcher’s spot in the rotation to avoid pitching in tax jurisdictions that are notorious for assessing state and local income taxes on visiting players.
The champion at this is the City of Philadelphia, although New York City is not far behind. If, for example, the Cubs are playing an East Coast road trip, what are the tax implications for a median-income starting pitcher appearing in games in Washington and Baltimore (assuming inter-league play) versus Philadelphia and New York?