Politicians exaggerate as a routine matter and have well-deserved reputations for stretching the truth. But when they repeatedly make assertions that they (or their aides) know to be false, they surely deserve to be criticized. That is the purpose of my new video. Entitled “President Obama’s Dishonest Demagoguery on So-Called Tax Havens,” the four-minute presentation looks at the two sound bites that the President uses to demonize low-tax jurisdictions.
President Obama’s Dishonest Demagoguery
July 21, 2009 by Dan Mitchell
Posted in Fiscal Policy, Sovereignty, Tax Haven, Taxation, Video | Tagged Economics, Fiscal Policy, Free Markets, Tax Haven, Taxation, Video | 51 Comments
51 Responses
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
-
Join 4,863 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Pages
- 100 Tragic Years of Communism
- Bureaucrat Hall of Fame
- Bureaucrat Humor (pending)
- Collectivism Humor
- Five Things About Me
- Government in Cartoons and Images
- Gun Control Satire
- Honest Leftists
- Libertarian Humor
- Libertarian Quandaries
- Mocking Europeans
- Moocher Hall of Fame
- Poverty Hucksters
- Sex and Government
- Victims of Government
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
- Big Government Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Class warfare Competitiveness Constitution Corporate income tax Corporate tax Corruption Crime Cronyism Debt Deficit Dependency Donald Trump Economics Education England Entitlements Europe Fiscal Crisis Fiscal Policy Flat Tax Free Markets Government-run healthcare Government intervention Government Spending Government stupidity Government Thuggery Government waste Gun control Health Care Health Reform Higher Taxes Humor International bureaucracy IRS Jobs Joe Biden Keynesian Economics Laffer Curve Libertarianism Liberty Local government News Appearance Obama Obamacare OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Political Humor Politics Poverty Protectionism Redistribution Regulation Republicans Socialism States Statism stimulus Supply-side economics Taxation Tax avoidance Tax Competition Tax Haven Tax Increase Tax Increases Tax Reform Trade Unemployment United Kingdom Value-Added Tax VAT Welfare Welfare State
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- Academic Bias
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Arizona
- Asset Forfeiture
- Atlas Shrugged
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Basic Income
- Belgium
- Bernanke
- Bernie Sanders
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Boris Johnson
- Botswana
- Brain drain
- Brazil
- Brexit
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- Buttigieg
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- Carbon Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- Cayman Islands
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Charity
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Civil Disobedience
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Colorado
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Connecticut
- Constitution
- Convergence
- Coolidge
- Corbyn
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Creative Destruction
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Demographics
- Denmark
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Donald Trump
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economic Rankings
- Economics
- Education
- EITC
- Election
- Elitism
- Elizabeth Warren
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Equality
- Estonia
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- European Union
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- FATCA
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- Florida
- Food and Drug Administration
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Gas Tax
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gold Standard
- Gordon Brown
- Government Inefficiency
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Green New Deal
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hillary Clinton
- Homeschooling
- Hong Kong
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hungary
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- India
- Industrial Policy
- Inequality
- Inflation
- Infrastructure
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Iowa
- Iran
- Ireland
- IRS
- Israel
- Italy
- Janet Yellen
- Japan
- JCT
- Jimmy Carter
- Jobs
- Joe Biden
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Jury Nullification
- Justin Trudeau
- Kamala Harris
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Licensing
- Liechtenstein
- Liz Truss
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Macron
- Mandate
- Margaret Thatcher
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Massachusetts
- Media Bias
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Mexico
- Michael Bloomberg
- Michigan
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Minnesota
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Mitchell's Theorem
- Mobility
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New York
- New Zealand
- News Appearance
- Nixon
- North Carolina
- North Korea
- Norway
- Obama
- Ocasio-Cortez
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- Panama
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paul Krugman
- Paul Ryan
- Paulson
- Payroll Taxation
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Poland
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Pope Francis
- Portugal
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Productivity
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Choice
- Public Goods
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rand Paul
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Rent Control
- Republicans
- Roads
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Rule of Law
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- Savings
- School Choice
- Scotland
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Capital
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Societal Capital
- Softball
- South Africa
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- Spending Cap
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Sweden
- Switzerland
- TABOR
- Taiwan
- TARP
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Loophole
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Theresa May
- Third party payer
- Thomas Sowell
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- Transportation
- TSA
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- Vaping
- VAT
- Venezuela
- Video
- Virginia
- Vouchers
- Wages
- Wagner's Law
- Walter Williams
- Warren Harding
- Waste
- Wealth Tax
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- World Health Organization
- World Trade Organization
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
- Zimbabwe
- Zoning
[…] Dishonest leftists who understand economics but pretend that tradeoffs don’t exist (the “demagogues“). […]
[…] Dishonest leftists who understand economics but pretend that tradeoffs don’t exist (the “demagogues“). […]
[…] Dishonest leftists who understand economics but pretend that tradeoffs don’t exist (the “demagogues“). […]
[…] Dishonest leftists who understand economics but pretend that tradeoffs don’t exist (the “demagogues“). […]
[…] Dishonest leftists who understand economics but pretend that tradeoffs don’t exist (the “demagogues“). […]
[…] you want more information, here’s a three-part video series on tax havens, and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the […]
[…] If you want more information, here’s a three-part video series on tax havens, and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the […]
[…] If you want more information, here’s a three-part video series on tax havens, and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the […]
[…] more information, about 10 years ago, I narrated a three-part video series on tax havens, and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the […]
[…] sick of seeing me on the screen, I also have a three-part video series on tax havens and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the […]
[…] years ago, I narrated a video on tax competition, a three-part video series on tax havens, and even a video debunking some of Obama’s demagoguery on the […]
[…] rules is a comparatively small amount of additional tax revenue for politicians (Obama originally promised $100 billion annually from FATCA and the actual law is projected to collect than $1 billion per […]
[…] P.P.S. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial mentioned Ugland House in the Cayman Islands. That’s the building that featured in some of Barack Obama’s dishonest demagoguery. […]
[…] But will GOPers deliver on that promise? Especially if the left unleashes the kind of demagoguery we often see in Congress and that we saw from Obama during the 2008 campaign? […]
[…] since we’re looking at videos, here’s my video on Obama’s anti-tax haven […]
[…] I’m sure nobody will be surprised to learns that Obama has played a destructive role in these […]
[…] such considerations don’t matter to politicians who like to demagogue about the supposed pot of gold at the end of the rainbow of overseas Americans. So we get awful […]
[…] during the 2008 campaign, Obama claimed that laws like FATCA would generate $100 billion per year. From the perspective of tax collectors, […]
[…] during the 2008 campaign, Obama claimed that laws like FATCA would generate $100 billion per year. From the perspective of tax collectors, […]
[…] To refresh your memory, pay attention beginning at the 1:135 mark of this video. […]
[…] Obama, for instance, has been so critical of tax havens that he’s been caught making utterly dishonest statements on the […]
[…] Obama, for instance, has been so critical of tax havens that he’s been caught making utterly dishonest statements on the […]
[…] Obama, for instance, has been so critical of tax havens that he’s been caught making utterly dishonest statements on the […]
[…] on “tax havens” would generate $100 billion every year. If you don’t believe me, click here and listen to his words at the 2;30 […]
[…] To refresh your memory, pay attention beginning at the 1:135 mark of this video. […]
[…] To refresh your memory, pay attention beginning at the 1:135 mark of this video. […]
[…] that Senator Levin is not the only dishonest demagogue in Washington. If you pay close attention around 1:25 and 2:25 of this video, you’ll see that the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue also has an unfortunate […]
[…] you’ll notice in this video that a certain presidential candidate referenced Ugland House back in […]
[…] is needed to restrain greedy politicians, so he scores a goal against the statists. But, unlike our President and some others who are even more radical, I don’t think he was trying to advance the […]
[…] of $100 billion per year. Obama threw around that make-believe number in the 2008 campaign, as seen in this video. But as shown in the final video of this post, the $100 billion figure was concocted out of thin […]
[…] of $100 billion per year. Obama threw around that make-believe number in the 2008 campaign, as seen in this video. But as shown in the final video of this post, the $100 billion figure was concocted out of thin […]
Reblogged this on Freedom from the tyranny of U.S. citizenship-based taxation for U.S. and dual citizens outside the U.S. and commented:
Thanks again – your posts should be spread far and wide!
Thanks for a brilliant analysis:
[…] of $100 billion per year. Obama threw around that make-believe number in the 2008 campaign, as seen in this video. But as shown in the final video of this post, the $100 billion figure was concocted out of thin […]
[…] with total certainty that the left’s claims are absurd. During the 2008 campaign, for instance, then-candidate Obama said that his anti-tax haven policies would generate $100 billion every year. When his law was enacted in 2010, that huge amount of money shrank to only $870 million per year. […]
[…] with total certainty that the left’s claims are absurd. During the 2008 campaign, for instance, then-candidate Obama said that his anti-tax haven policies would generate $100 billion every year. When his law was enacted in 2010, that huge amount of money shrank to only $870 million per year. […]
[…] with total certainty that the left’s claims are absurd. During the 2008 campaign, for instance, then-candidate Obama said that his anti-tax haven policies would generate $100 billion every year. When his law was enacted in 2010, that huge amount of money shrank to only $870 million per year. […]
[…] FATCA will transfer more money from the productive sector of the economy to the government. Indeed, Obama argued during the 2008 campaign that cracking down on “tax havens” with proposals such as FATCA would give politicians […]
[…] FATCA will transfer more money from the productive sector of the economy to the government. Indeed, Obama argued during the 2008 campaign that cracking down on “tax havens” with proposals such as FATCA would give politicians […]
[…] FATCA will transfer more money from the productive sector of the economy to the government. Indeed, Obama argued during the 2008 campaign that cracking down on “tax havens” with proposals such as FATCA would give politicians […]
[…] FATCA will transfer more money from the productive sector of the economy to the government. Indeed, Obama argued during the 2008 campaign that cracking down on “tax havens” with proposals such as FATCA would give politicians […]
[…] FATCA will transfer more money from the productive sector of the economy to the government. Indeed, Obama argued during the 2008 campaign that cracking down on “tax havens” with proposals such as FATCA would give politicians […]
[…] FATCA will transfer more money from the productive sector of the economy to the government. Indeed, Obama argued during the 2008 campaign that cracking down on “tax havens” with proposals such as FATCA would give politicians […]
[…] In other words, there is nothing nefarious about Ugland House, just as there is nothing wrong with the small building in Delaware that is home to more than 200,000 companies. Obama, by the way, demagogued about Ugland House during the 2008 campaign. […]
[…] lied about the number of companies at Ugland House? No, the Senator is correct (unlike Obama, who demagogued about the same building during the 2008 campaign, but said there were 12,000 […]
[…] “benefit” is more tax revenue. So how does FATCA score on this basis? During the 2008 campaign, Obama claimed this policy would generate $100 billion of additional revenue every year. When it came time to score the legislation, however, the Joint Committee on Taxation predicted […]
[…] “benefit” is more tax revenue. So how does FATCA score on this basis? During the 2008 campaign, Obama claimed this policy would generate $100 billion of additional revenue every year. When it came time to score the legislation, however, the Joint Committee on Taxation predicted […]
[…] is more tax revenue. So how does FATCA score on this basis? During the 2008 campaign, Obama claimed this policy would generate $100 billion of additional revenue every year. When it came time to score the legislation, however, the Joint Committee on Taxation predicted […]
[…] Or, perhaps, could it be the case that leftists on both sides of the Atlantic don’t like tax competition? But rather than openly argue for tax harmonization and other policies that would lead to higher taxes and a loss of fiscal sovereignty, they think they will have more luck expanding the power of government by employing demagoguery against the big, bad, multinational companies and small, low-tax jurisdictions. […]
[…] Or, perhaps, could it be the case that leftists on both sides of the Atlantic don’t like tax competition? But rather than openly argue for tax harmonization and other policies that would lead to higher taxes and a loss of fiscal sovereignty, they think they will have more luck expanding the power of government by employing demagoguery against the big, bad, multinational companies and small, low-tax jurisdictions. […]
[…] Or, perhaps, could it be the case that leftists on both sides of the Atlantic don’t like tax competition? But rather than openly argue for tax harmonization and other policies that would lead to higher taxes and a loss of fiscal sovereignty, they think they will have more luck expanding the power of government by employing demagoguery against the big, bad, multinational companies and small, low-tax jurisdictions. […]