I realize the sequester kicks in tomorrow and I should be writing about that rare opportunity to control the burden of government spending.
To be sure, my fingers are crossed that Republicans won’t snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, and I’ve been busy on Capitol Hill talking to folks about the issue, but this post already says everything you need to know about that topic.
It’s time to switch gears, particularly since I have a soft spot for feel-good stories.
And what could be more heart-tugging than a story about the right to keep and bear tanks?
Here are some blurbs from the Wall Street Journal.
Weapons buffs may stock semiautomatics in the gun safe. But nothing makes a statement like having an Army tank in the garage. …there are several hundred to 1,000 private tank owners in the U.S. …Brothers Ken and Gene Neal, owners of Bullet Proof Diesel, a truck-parts manufacturer in Mesa, Ariz., once took their 1966 British Chieftain tank into the desert and joyfully backed it over a rusty car. When their insurance agent inquired about their plans for the tank, the Neal brothers emailed back, “We are going to use it to take over the world.” Says Ken Neal, 45: “A tank is cool.”
But is it legal?
Yup, and it can even have a working gun if you’re willing to fork over $200 for a permit.
A tank in the U.S. can have operational guns, if the owner has a federal Destructive Device permit, and state laws don’t prohibit it. The permit costs $200, and the applicant must swear he hasn’t been a “fugitive from justice,” “adjudicated mentally defective” or convicted of “a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.” A local law-enforcement official, usually a sheriff or police chief, has to sign off on the application. Tanks generally aren’t street-legal, so owners usually drive them off-road or on other private property. Some say local authorities sometimes make exceptions for parades, a quick test drive or a trip to the gas station.
But won’t tanks in private hands lead to horrible crimes? Doesn’t seem that way, particularly since the story mentions that the only tank used in a crime was one taken from a government armory.
And in sensible places such as Texas, local police think a tank is “awesome,” not a cause for hysteria.
Earlier this month, Mr. Bauer, the Texas banker, took his Chaffee out for a spin in his warehouse parking lot. He had rigged the .50-caliber machine gun on the turret with a propane system that generates the noise and muzzle flash of gunfire, without the bullets. He fired off several bursts. Minutes later, two Port Lavaca police cruisers pulled up. The first officer rolled down the window and asked dryly: “You know why we’re here, right?” Mr. Bauer assured him that no actual rounds had been fired. …The second policeman, Jeremy Marshall, got out of his car and eyeballed Mr. Bauer’s tank. “Awesome,” he said.
Meanwhile, a 6-year old boy in Maryland is suspended for making a gun shape with his fingers and a 5-year old girl in Pennsylvania is busted for having a pink plastic gun that shoots bubbles.
The best of America…and the worst of America.
But we shouldn’t be resting on our laurels. Most able-bodied men in Switzerland have fully automatic guns (i.e., capable of continuous firing) in their homes, so it’s an open question which nation is more “awesome.”

There’s a facility in the UK where you can drive all the main battle tanks from the Second WW, inlcuding Soviet and German. I say we take a field trip.
It is one, but not the main, reason why I admire Switzerland more than the US. Not that much because of the gun issue, but because of economics and the rather unusual tendency of the Swiss to shy away from redistribution, which is the wellsprings and core electoral motivation behind big government. Were it not for the short-sighted silver lining of redistribution, most people would see big government as a negative force, on balance. But redistribution, or the mere and self-defeating hope of redistributing an ever slower growing pie to economic extinction, is what keeps support for big government above fifty percent, guaranteeing a path to decline for most of today’s western world.
So, unlike America which owes its good fortune to relatively recent historical serendipity and the one time event of civilized people discovering a brand new continent, the serendipitous seeding by an ideological fringe of mostly British individual liberty minded people — who BTW were a predictable minority in England, not to be given the light of day anywhere in the old world, and thus had to escape to virtually unpopulated America — and the American people having not had enough time to screw up their country (though they seem to have finally converged to average world mentality)…
…the Swiss have had many centuries to screw things up, have been landlocked by various forms of softer and harder totalitarianism for a century, and yet they retain exceptional economic freedom which has now surpassed the US (and seems poised to diverge ever further as US freedom ranking is on a definitive declining trendline).
That is why I think the Swiss are wise. The Americans are just lucky.
Un-rationalized prosperity will be lost…
… and you’d better keep your bags packed, because the initial endowment of luck has run out. With ideological convergence to the rest of the world, economic fortune cannot but follow suit.
Reblogged this on Life, Liberty & the Law and commented:
Interesting post from a fellow wordpress blogger.
[...] is a nation where you can own a tank or a machine gun, and it’s a country where there are probably more guns than [...]
[…] is a nation where you can own a tank or a machine gun, and it’s a country where there are probably more guns than […]