<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/</link>
	<description>Restraining Government in America and Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:57:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don’t Believe the Gloom-and-Doom Hype - Investing Video &#38; Audio Jay Taylor Media</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-64808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don’t Believe the Gloom-and-Doom Hype - Investing Video &#38; Audio Jay Taylor Media]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-64808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] you&#8217;re feeling depressed these days, I very much recommend reading this article by the Cato Institute&#8217;s Dan Mitchell. If you understand what Mitchell is saying, then [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you&#8217;re feeling depressed these days, I very much recommend reading this article by the Cato Institute&#8217;s Dan Mitchell. If you understand what Mitchell is saying, then [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huge Value-Added Tax Increases in Europe Show Why Washington Politicians Should Never Be Given a New Source of Tax Revenue &#124; lessbull.com</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-63968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huge Value-Added Tax Increases in Europe Show Why Washington Politicians Should Never Be Given a New Source of Tax Revenue &#124; lessbull.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 23:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-63968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] powerful, and relevant argument against the value-added tax in the short run is that we can balance the budget in just five years by capping spending so it grows at the rate of inflation, a very modest level of fiscal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] powerful, and relevant argument against the value-added tax in the short run is that we can balance the budget in just five years by capping spending so it grows at the rate of inflation, a very modest level of fiscal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huge Value-Added Tax Increases in Europe Show Why Washington Politicians Should Never Be Given a New Source of Tax Revenue &#171; Sago</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-63947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huge Value-Added Tax Increases in Europe Show Why Washington Politicians Should Never Be Given a New Source of Tax Revenue &#171; Sago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-63947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] powerful, and relevant argument against the value-added tax in the short run is that we can balance the budget in just five years by capping spending so it grows at the rate of inflation, a very modest level of fiscal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] powerful, and relevant argument against the value-added tax in the short run is that we can balance the budget in just five years by capping spending so it grows at the rate of inflation, a very modest level of fiscal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huge Value-Added Tax Increases in Europe Show Why Washington Politicians Should Never Be Given a New Source of Tax Revenue &#124; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-63894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huge Value-Added Tax Increases in Europe Show Why Washington Politicians Should Never Be Given a New Source of Tax Revenue &#124; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 14:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-63894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] powerful, and relevant argument against the value-added tax in the short run is that we can balance the budget in just five years by capping spending so it grows at the rate of inflation, a very modest level of fiscal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] powerful, and relevant argument against the value-added tax in the short run is that we can balance the budget in just five years by capping spending so it grows at the rate of inflation, a very modest level of fiscal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Use of our tax money is pretty stupid &#124; The Daily Hatch</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-62040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Use of our tax money is pretty stupid &#124; The Daily Hatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 11:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-62040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I explained earlier this year, we can balance the budget in just 10 years if spending grows “only” 3.4 percent per year. When people understand that detail, there’s almost no support for higher [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I explained earlier this year, we can balance the budget in just 10 years if spending grows “only” 3.4 percent per year. When people understand that detail, there’s almost no support for higher [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Aggravating Reminder of Government Waste on Tax Day &#124; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-62005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Aggravating Reminder of Government Waste on Tax Day &#124; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-62005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I explained earlier this year, we can balance the budget in just 10 years if spending grows &#8220;only&#8221; 3.4 percent per year. When people understand that detail, there&#8217;s almost no support for higher [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I explained earlier this year, we can balance the budget in just 10 years if spending grows &#8220;only&#8221; 3.4 percent per year. When people understand that detail, there&#8217;s almost no support for higher [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: President Obama will not cut spending ever it appears &#124; The Daily Hatch</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-61006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[President Obama will not cut spending ever it appears &#124; The Daily Hatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-61006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] P.S. The budget approved by the House of Representatives avoided any tax increases and restrained spending to that it will grow by an average of 3.4 percent annually. Not exactly draconian, but that approach does balance the budget in 10 years. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P.S. The budget approved by the House of Representatives avoided any tax increases and restrained spending to that it will grow by an average of 3.4 percent annually. Not exactly draconian, but that approach does balance the budget in 10 years. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018 &#124; International Liberty &#124; jamesbbkk</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-60743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018 &#124; International Liberty &#124; jamesbbkk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 00:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-60743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018 &#124; Interna.... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018 | Interna&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where is our country headed with our debt? &#124; The Daily Hatch</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-60109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Where is our country headed with our debt? &#124; The Daily Hatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-60109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] be sure, that doesn’t mean we’re seeing good policies of tax reform and fiscal restraint. And we still face a very dour fiscal future unless entitlements are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be sure, that doesn’t mean we’re seeing good policies of tax reform and fiscal restraint. And we still face a very dour fiscal future unless entitlements are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Good News: We&#8217;re Heading in the Wrong Direction at a Slower Pace &#124; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-60081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Good News: We&#8217;re Heading in the Wrong Direction at a Slower Pace &#124; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-60081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] be sure, that doesn&#8217;t mean we&#8217;re seeing good policies of tax reform and fiscal restraint. And we still face a very dour fiscal future unless entitlements are [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be sure, that doesn&#8217;t mean we&#8217;re seeing good policies of tax reform and fiscal restraint. And we still face a very dour fiscal future unless entitlements are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secret to Understanding our BIG Budget Problems: Think Small &#124; Job Creators Network</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-57955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Secret to Understanding our BIG Budget Problems: Think Small &#124; Job Creators Network]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 03:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-57955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Mr. Mitchell also says simple numbers will get us to balance the federal budget. According to his calculations, the government can continue to grow larger by 3.4 percent per year for the next decade and we [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mr. Mitchell also says simple numbers will get us to balance the federal budget. According to his calculations, the government can continue to grow larger by 3.4 percent per year for the next decade and we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth to New York Times: Please Show Us these &#8220;Deep Spending Cuts&#8221; You Keep Writing About &#124; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-57777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Earth to New York Times: Please Show Us these &#8220;Deep Spending Cuts&#8221; You Keep Writing About &#124; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-57777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is why almost nobody understands that it&#8217;s actually relatively simple to balance the budget with a modest bit of spending restraint. My goal is reducing the burden of government spending, not fiscal balance, but it&#8217;s worth noting that we&#8217;d have a balanced budget in just 10 years if spending grew by &#8220;only&#8221; 3.4 percen.... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is why almost nobody understands that it&#8217;s actually relatively simple to balance the budget with a modest bit of spending restraint. My goal is reducing the burden of government spending, not fiscal balance, but it&#8217;s worth noting that we&#8217;d have a balanced budget in just 10 years if spending grew by &#8220;only&#8221; 3.4 percen&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorba</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-55963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zorba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 01:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-55963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets see what other delusions those responsible for compiling and summarizing the ultimate fiscal reality assessment for the American People have concocted. Let me guess. The probably factored in that:
 
The US will return to its 3% to 4% annual growth trendline, even after the disincentive to production tax increases are factored in, the “so long as you stay home enough with your family (boy, aren’t you going to get bored—nobody to work for…) to make less than 90k per year, from now on someone else will pay for most of your healthcare” ObamaCare incentive to production is also factored in, and the slew of regulation/collective economic management legislation Americans are boxing their industry in, has no detrimental impact to the exceptionally fertile environment America once was for business.

With the new taxes on the rich, the redistribution aspirations of HopNChange have been satisfied for the next decade, the budget will be balanced, and so productive people can move on, confident that the generous proportions of their rewards they have been allowed to keep, will be theirs, secure. 

ObamaCare, an entitlement that is even more redistributive in nature than European health systems, will truly only cost one trillion. People will not change their behavior. If they happen to be hit by the new taxes and regulations then… well… too bad… BUT they will keep working with enough enthusiasm to outcompete three billion emerging world souls. If they do qualify for the subsidies, they will work harder, make sure they don’t burden the rest of society with their healthcare costs and, of course, that will generate enough motivation to outcompete three billion emerging world souls. Unable to squeeze the private sector even more, for fear it may fall to international competition, the American voter-lemmings are unable to fund the two main existing entitlement programs of social security and medicare. So, they voted for a whole new permanent and irreversible entitlement, Obamacare which is even more redistributive than the previous two. It gives strong incentives to indolence, but don’t worry, its cost overrun will not be massive.

Oh, let me guess, they factored in that the sequester will take place and hold up to class warfare propaganda for the next ten years, and that this will be the first congress ever to finally stick to the regularly scheduled (but never adhered to) medicare reimbursement cuts. 

Ok, let’s just be optimistic. This may all just work out in the end….

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The dynamics of international competitiveness and prosperity depend of very narrow margins. The point of no return has passed. It is time to build Noah’s arc, as the rising tide of three billion emerging world souls drowns the western world voter-lemmings. But wait! Before pulling up the ramp, … don’t miss the one last great hurahh!... it’s time to join everybody in the great European welfare benefits smorgasbord. But secure that floating vessel first…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets see what other delusions those responsible for compiling and summarizing the ultimate fiscal reality assessment for the American People have concocted. Let me guess. The probably factored in that:</p>
<p>The US will return to its 3% to 4% annual growth trendline, even after the disincentive to production tax increases are factored in, the “so long as you stay home enough with your family (boy, aren’t you going to get bored—nobody to work for…) to make less than 90k per year, from now on someone else will pay for most of your healthcare” ObamaCare incentive to production is also factored in, and the slew of regulation/collective economic management legislation Americans are boxing their industry in, has no detrimental impact to the exceptionally fertile environment America once was for business.</p>
<p>With the new taxes on the rich, the redistribution aspirations of HopNChange have been satisfied for the next decade, the budget will be balanced, and so productive people can move on, confident that the generous proportions of their rewards they have been allowed to keep, will be theirs, secure. </p>
<p>ObamaCare, an entitlement that is even more redistributive in nature than European health systems, will truly only cost one trillion. People will not change their behavior. If they happen to be hit by the new taxes and regulations then… well… too bad… BUT they will keep working with enough enthusiasm to outcompete three billion emerging world souls. If they do qualify for the subsidies, they will work harder, make sure they don’t burden the rest of society with their healthcare costs and, of course, that will generate enough motivation to outcompete three billion emerging world souls. Unable to squeeze the private sector even more, for fear it may fall to international competition, the American voter-lemmings are unable to fund the two main existing entitlement programs of social security and medicare. So, they voted for a whole new permanent and irreversible entitlement, Obamacare which is even more redistributive than the previous two. It gives strong incentives to indolence, but don’t worry, its cost overrun will not be massive.</p>
<p>Oh, let me guess, they factored in that the sequester will take place and hold up to class warfare propaganda for the next ten years, and that this will be the first congress ever to finally stick to the regularly scheduled (but never adhered to) medicare reimbursement cuts. </p>
<p>Ok, let’s just be optimistic. This may all just work out in the end….</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The dynamics of international competitiveness and prosperity depend of very narrow margins. The point of no return has passed. It is time to build Noah’s arc, as the rising tide of three billion emerging world souls drowns the western world voter-lemmings. But wait! Before pulling up the ramp, … don’t miss the one last great hurahh!&#8230; it’s time to join everybody in the great European welfare benefits smorgasbord. But secure that floating vessel first…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorba</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-55929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zorba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 20:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-55929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2013 AD: In a parallel universe, USA++ has the same per capita income as our earthly USA. But USA++ embarks on a program to divest economic activity from government back to the private sector through privatizations. Government spending falls from 39% of GDP down to 15%. Its growth rate rises to a 5% annual trendline, matching the world average.

2046 AD (33 years later): USA++ government still consumes only 15% of GDP but last year it surpassed the earthly USA we know in total government spending.

And guess what? USA++ is still on that 5% annual growth trendline, while USA is still languishing at that 2% trendline (probably worse by then since, in the intervening 33 years, voter-lemmings will have responded to their decline with more redistribution hope at the polls).

Oh yes, I forgot, USA++ per capita income is now 260% of our earthly USA per capita income -- though not as evenly distributed.

USA’s military, still consuming a full 4% of GDP, has just fallen behind USA++’s military, consuming a mere 1.5% of GDP.

The divergence in economic trajectories continues. How long will the ever poorer but more equal declining citizens of earthly USA go on before they cry uncle?  It is only a matter of when not if.

-------------------------------------------------------
Voter-lemming: What? Just as French level government benefits are finally in the horizon you advocate cutting my government job and support and expose me to the private competition of three billion people who are still in line to buy their first car? So that my children can be 160% richer? Forget it! I’ll make sure I hire as many more people as I can at the government office, so that we can make sure we are a permanent majority. We are also instituting French as a second language in school -- and Greek as a third language, just in case.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those of you interested in the trivial arithmetic:

(1+(5%))^33*(15%) &gt; (1+(2%))^33*(39%) 
[(1+(5%))^33] / [(1+(2%))^33] = (260%)

BTW, these simple expressions are all European children need to know to see their future. US children should start paying attention to them too…

--------------------------------------------

2060: USA military now spends 15% of GDP and is still falling behind other powers at an ever faster pace. Economic decline has inevitably brought military decline, and USA government spending is now 65% of GDP. Growth rate is 0-1% (when it is positive). But there is at least a bit of hope: A new leader got elected under the slogans of : Egalité, fraternité collectivisme, the new trends in hope. That may just finally keep us from sliding even further behind for a few more years, or at least mitigate some of the pain of further decline. 

If “We’re all in this together, let’s vote for it” were the recipe to prosperity, then things would be easy. Prosperity would be widespread. It would not have taken the historical serendipity of discovering a brand new continent to become the most prosperous country in the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2013 AD: In a parallel universe, USA++ has the same per capita income as our earthly USA. But USA++ embarks on a program to divest economic activity from government back to the private sector through privatizations. Government spending falls from 39% of GDP down to 15%. Its growth rate rises to a 5% annual trendline, matching the world average.</p>
<p>2046 AD (33 years later): USA++ government still consumes only 15% of GDP but last year it surpassed the earthly USA we know in total government spending.</p>
<p>And guess what? USA++ is still on that 5% annual growth trendline, while USA is still languishing at that 2% trendline (probably worse by then since, in the intervening 33 years, voter-lemmings will have responded to their decline with more redistribution hope at the polls).</p>
<p>Oh yes, I forgot, USA++ per capita income is now 260% of our earthly USA per capita income &#8212; though not as evenly distributed.</p>
<p>USA’s military, still consuming a full 4% of GDP, has just fallen behind USA++’s military, consuming a mere 1.5% of GDP.</p>
<p>The divergence in economic trajectories continues. How long will the ever poorer but more equal declining citizens of earthly USA go on before they cry uncle?  It is only a matter of when not if.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Voter-lemming: What? Just as French level government benefits are finally in the horizon you advocate cutting my government job and support and expose me to the private competition of three billion people who are still in line to buy their first car? So that my children can be 160% richer? Forget it! I’ll make sure I hire as many more people as I can at the government office, so that we can make sure we are a permanent majority. We are also instituting French as a second language in school &#8212; and Greek as a third language, just in case.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
For those of you interested in the trivial arithmetic:</p>
<p>(1+(5%))^33*(15%) &gt; (1+(2%))^33*(39%)<br />
[(1+(5%))^33] / [(1+(2%))^33] = (260%)</p>
<p>BTW, these simple expressions are all European children need to know to see their future. US children should start paying attention to them too…</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>2060: USA military now spends 15% of GDP and is still falling behind other powers at an ever faster pace. Economic decline has inevitably brought military decline, and USA government spending is now 65% of GDP. Growth rate is 0-1% (when it is positive). But there is at least a bit of hope: A new leader got elected under the slogans of : Egalité, fraternité collectivisme, the new trends in hope. That may just finally keep us from sliding even further behind for a few more years, or at least mitigate some of the pain of further decline. </p>
<p>If “We’re all in this together, let’s vote for it” were the recipe to prosperity, then things would be easy. Prosperity would be widespread. It would not have taken the historical serendipity of discovering a brand new continent to become the most prosperous country in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drik</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-55909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-55909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we had spending restraint, we wouldn&#039;t need democrats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we had spending restraint, we wouldn&#8217;t need democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crisap</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/if-spending-is-capped-so-it-grows-at-the-rate-of-inflation-the-budget-is-balanced-in-2018/#comment-55887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crisap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=22101#comment-55887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://conservativenewager.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/3886/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Conservative New Ager&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://conservativenewager.wordpress.com/2013/02/06/3886/" rel="nofollow">The Conservative New Ager</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
