<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don’t Get Bamboozled by the Fiscal Cliff: Five Policy Reasons and Five Political Reasons Why Republicans Should Keep their No-Tax-Hike Promises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/</link>
	<description>Restraining Government in America and Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s the Best Response when Crony Capitalists from Big Business Endorse Higher Taxes on their Small Business Competitors? &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-50347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What&#8217;s the Best Response when Crony Capitalists from Big Business Endorse Higher Taxes on their Small Business Competitors? &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-50347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] this also explains why I am such a strong believer in the no-tax-hike pledge. Once &#8220;revenue enhancement&#8221; is part of the discussion, taxpayers lose their sense of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this also explains why I am such a strong believer in the no-tax-hike pledge. Once &#8220;revenue enhancement&#8221; is part of the discussion, taxpayers lose their sense of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angie</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-49959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-49959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans nor democrats get it.  There are so many places to make cuts.  But all I am hearing about is medicare.  I know elderly people who live on $700 per month with maybe $30 in food stamps.  &amp;  I am hearing that one of the cuts is their cost of living.  I wished we could have one of the grannies receiving this amount in Soc. Security  come &amp; do a budget for Washington.  They would know how &amp; I do not believe they would need a tax increase to balance the budget, I am sure they could find  a few pet projects that could be cut. What is wrong with our leaders in Washington?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans nor democrats get it.  There are so many places to make cuts.  But all I am hearing about is medicare.  I know elderly people who live on $700 per month with maybe $30 in food stamps.  &amp;  I am hearing that one of the cuts is their cost of living.  I wished we could have one of the grannies receiving this amount in Soc. Security  come &amp; do a budget for Washington.  They would know how &amp; I do not believe they would need a tax increase to balance the budget, I am sure they could find  a few pet projects that could be cut. What is wrong with our leaders in Washington?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Which Cartoon Best Captures the GOP Mindset? &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-49588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Which Cartoon Best Captures the GOP Mindset? &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-49588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently did a post explaining five policy reasons and five political reasons why Republicans should maintain a firm no-tax-hike [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently did a post explaining five policy reasons and five political reasons why Republicans should maintain a firm no-tax-hike [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republicans seem to give in most of the time on spending issues &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-49572</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Republicans seem to give in most of the time on spending issues &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-49572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] political advice, but I also want to expand upon the arguments I made a couple of days ago, when I wrote a post giving five policy reasons and five political reasons why the GOP shouldn’t surrender on tax [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] political advice, but I also want to expand upon the arguments I made a couple of days ago, when I wrote a post giving five policy reasons and five political reasons why the GOP shouldn’t surrender on tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everette Hatcher III, www.thedailyhatch.org</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-49264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everette Hatcher III, www.thedailyhatch.org]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-49264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wimp Republicans will give in like they always do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wimp Republicans will give in like they always do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political arguments against higher taxes from Dan Mitchell &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-49254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Political arguments against higher taxes from Dan Mitchell &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-49254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Don’t Get Bamboozled by the Fiscal Cliff: Five Policy Reasons and Five Political Reasons Why Repub... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Don’t Get Bamboozled by the Fiscal Cliff: Five Policy Reasons and Five Political Reasons Why Repub&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Link Between High Tax Rates and Corruption &#124; Dan Mitchell &#8211; the Conservative Top 10</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-49030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Link Between High Tax Rates and Corruption &#124; Dan Mitchell &#8211; the Conservative Top 10]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-49030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I’ve been very critical of Obama’s class-warfare ideology because it leads to bad fiscal policy. But perhaps it is time to give some attention to other arguments against high tax rates. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’ve been very critical of Obama’s class-warfare ideology because it leads to bad fiscal policy. But perhaps it is time to give some attention to other arguments against high tax rates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: For both Policy Reasons and Political Reasons, the Fiscal Cliff Is Better than Surrender &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[For both Policy Reasons and Political Reasons, the Fiscal Cliff Is Better than Surrender &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] political advice, but I also want to expand upon the arguments I made a couple of days ago, when I wrote a post giving five policy reasons and five political reasons why the GOP shouldn&#8217;t surrender on tax [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] political advice, but I also want to expand upon the arguments I made a couple of days ago, when I wrote a post giving five policy reasons and five political reasons why the GOP shouldn&#8217;t surrender on tax [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Link Between High Tax Rates and Corruption &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Link Between High Tax Rates and Corruption &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I&#8217;ve been very critical of Obama&#8217;s class-warfare ideology because it leads to bad fiscal policy. But perhaps it is time to give some attention to other arguments against high tax rates. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been very critical of Obama&#8217;s class-warfare ideology because it leads to bad fiscal policy. But perhaps it is time to give some attention to other arguments against high tax rates. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink? &#171; OBAMA-B-GONEOBAMA-B-GONE</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink? &#171; OBAMA-B-GONEOBAMA-B-GONE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink?</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink? &#124; PatriotsBillboard</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink? &#124; PatriotsBillboard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 10:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink? &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Learning from the European Experience: Do Higher Tax Burdens Lead to Less Red Ink? &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been arguing against higher taxes because of my concerns that more revenue will simply lead to a bigger burden of government [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Hart</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will Hart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Obama and the Democrats did (and this really is kind of shady) was use the 2009 budget as a baseline and essentially move forward with it via a series of continuing resolutions. It&#039;s kind of like wrecking your car and deciding afterwards that you really like spending an extra $25,000 a year and so you continue to do so in perpetuity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Obama and the Democrats did (and this really is kind of shady) was use the 2009 budget as a baseline and essentially move forward with it via a series of continuing resolutions. It&#8217;s kind of like wrecking your car and deciding afterwards that you really like spending an extra $25,000 a year and so you continue to do so in perpetuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Litteken @GoJL16</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Litteken @GoJL16]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 21:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reblogged this on &lt;a href=&quot;http://littekeneconomics.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/222/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Litteken Economics&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reblogged this on <a href="http://littekeneconomics.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/222/" rel="nofollow">Litteken Economics</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zorba</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zorba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only way to pay for current spending levels by taxing only “the rich” would be to apply 50-60% income tax rates all the way down to 100k of income – AND hope for no Laffer Curve effects aAND no American worldwide competitiveness declines.  

And this calculation that does not include the bourgeoning cost overruns of Obamacare, a behemoth and still budding motivational cancer  entitlement, with the inevitable perverse side effects of encouraging people of all ages to supply less, or more relaxed (i.e. lower quality) labor to the overall economy, while America faces challenges from the three billion emerging world. These economic activity stifling costs, which will cause the USA to loose its top spot in worldwide competitiveness, go much deeper that the simple and obvious ObamaCare monetary cost overruns. But Obamacare, as an irreversible springboard to a full blown welfare state and irreversible path to decline is a story all in itself. Returning to the limits of financing even current levels of spending by only taxing the rich: It is impossible. 

So for all practical purposes, the American people have voted for a future with VAT and other hidden taxes that will affect both rich, middle and poor, while, MORE IMPORTANTLY, economic growth descends to European levels and Americans start sliding down their world prosperity rankings at 3% per year (=5% average world growth minus the new reality of a more euro-like American 2% growth trendline). But that is not even where it ends. The second derivative of growth is also negative. Relative to the historical 3-3.5% American growth trendline, a 2% growth trendline will precipitate a deteriorating mood amongst the American public. As the European story repeatedly demonstrated time and again, that coming American somber mood will inevitably translate into mandates for more “government help” through the democratic polling process. With electoral demand present and a three hundred million population, an even newer generation of politicians willing to guide the voter moths to the light will certainly be found and brought to prominence. 

These are the only equilibrium points of the welfare state, which Americans, for all practical purposes, have now chosen to join. And we are even talking about the relatively successful welfare states like Sweden and Denmark, not basket cases like Greece, Spain, Italy who are sliding down the world prosperity rankings at a full -5%, under near zero growth, or even negative growth -- though the negative growth is only a temporary adjustment in my view. If there were other equilibrium points, one or another of the many European states would have discovered it and settled in it during the now four decade long European experimentation with welfare state incentives. At best, this equilibrium is an equilibrium of relentlessly compounding decline, growing at 2% per year in a world that aggregately grows by 5% -- and thus sliding down the relative prosperity world rankings by 3% per year. A three percent perpetually compounding growth  deficit WILL amount to significant decline in relative standard of living over 10-20-30 years, a transformation already evident in the somber resigned mood of European life and prospects. That is the future Americans are staring right in the eye and have irreversibly chosen, like the moth tragically flies to the light in great Hope.

But while apprehensive, both American left and right hold out some hope that this will not happen. Hope that somehow, human genes upon migrating to America have irreversibly mutated in a mere century or less (clearly a biological impossibility) and therefore hope that Americans possessing these unique American genes will maintain -- even under the welfare state incentives -- their legendary ambition, optimism, desire and expectation to one day excel. Or they simply do not understand the very simple arithmetic reality that a two percent growth trendline, in a world that is growing by five percent, means the deterministic slide into decline at a three percent relentlessly compounding yearly rate. Or they do understand it but simply don’t care. They only see a couple of years ahead and think that consequences are far enough out into the future and corrective action wil somhow be an option it it does not work out. As for the right, they have their own delusions, like a non negligible proportion of “conservatives” who believe that The Divine is ultimately on America’s side, so what can go wrong?

But by the time reality smashes these Hopes for both left and right, it will be too late. WAY too late for any one citizen group to take the first unilateral step towards withdrawing from the welfare state, where everyone is everyone else’s partial slave. You withdraw, you loose your slave but remain a slave to others. Nobody steps forward, decline continues under a severely sub-par low-motivation growth trendline.

Once sandwiched between America on the top and the rising emerging world at the bottom, and continuing their way to decline, Europeans must be partially consoled that America is finally stepping on the same low-motivation, low-growth banana peel. They do though seem to be still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/obama-disappoints-expectations-of-climate-change-action-at-doha-summit-a-871193.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; complaining that America is not killing its motivation and prosperity fast enough.&lt;/a&gt; 

The western world lemmings that Americans have now decided to join, deserve every bit of the decline that is in store for them. Watching this unfold will be at least partially entertaining to me while I’m kept warm by the American furniture that HopNChange is burning, away and insulated from the rat-race of the “greedy”. If you decide to do the same, just make sure you secure a salvage boat for you and/or your kids -- for when the furniture eventually runs out into a rather fast decline – sooner rather than later. OR…, if the left is ultimately right (no pun intended), continue living-on happily, in perpetuity, in a high growth happy America, while you enjoy and consume the work of others, some distant motivated highly capable greedy individuals, or the unexceptional work of less motivated mediocre people who coming together under mandatory collectivism perform Paul Krugman economic magic and prosper.  

You decide what is wiser to do on a personal level. Cheer up! The future looks bright!!! The years of decline can be happy if you play your cards right and secure a life boat. Take it from an ex-European with some proportion of Greek blood. You find yourselves in the same environment as you are headed into, you WILL react the same way! Bye-bye America. American voter lemmings keep me warm with your furniture for a few more years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way to pay for current spending levels by taxing only “the rich” would be to apply 50-60% income tax rates all the way down to 100k of income – AND hope for no Laffer Curve effects aAND no American worldwide competitiveness declines.  </p>
<p>And this calculation that does not include the bourgeoning cost overruns of Obamacare, a behemoth and still budding motivational cancer  entitlement, with the inevitable perverse side effects of encouraging people of all ages to supply less, or more relaxed (i.e. lower quality) labor to the overall economy, while America faces challenges from the three billion emerging world. These economic activity stifling costs, which will cause the USA to loose its top spot in worldwide competitiveness, go much deeper that the simple and obvious ObamaCare monetary cost overruns. But Obamacare, as an irreversible springboard to a full blown welfare state and irreversible path to decline is a story all in itself. Returning to the limits of financing even current levels of spending by only taxing the rich: It is impossible. </p>
<p>So for all practical purposes, the American people have voted for a future with VAT and other hidden taxes that will affect both rich, middle and poor, while, MORE IMPORTANTLY, economic growth descends to European levels and Americans start sliding down their world prosperity rankings at 3% per year (=5% average world growth minus the new reality of a more euro-like American 2% growth trendline). But that is not even where it ends. The second derivative of growth is also negative. Relative to the historical 3-3.5% American growth trendline, a 2% growth trendline will precipitate a deteriorating mood amongst the American public. As the European story repeatedly demonstrated time and again, that coming American somber mood will inevitably translate into mandates for more “government help” through the democratic polling process. With electoral demand present and a three hundred million population, an even newer generation of politicians willing to guide the voter moths to the light will certainly be found and brought to prominence. </p>
<p>These are the only equilibrium points of the welfare state, which Americans, for all practical purposes, have now chosen to join. And we are even talking about the relatively successful welfare states like Sweden and Denmark, not basket cases like Greece, Spain, Italy who are sliding down the world prosperity rankings at a full -5%, under near zero growth, or even negative growth &#8212; though the negative growth is only a temporary adjustment in my view. If there were other equilibrium points, one or another of the many European states would have discovered it and settled in it during the now four decade long European experimentation with welfare state incentives. At best, this equilibrium is an equilibrium of relentlessly compounding decline, growing at 2% per year in a world that aggregately grows by 5% &#8212; and thus sliding down the relative prosperity world rankings by 3% per year. A three percent perpetually compounding growth  deficit WILL amount to significant decline in relative standard of living over 10-20-30 years, a transformation already evident in the somber resigned mood of European life and prospects. That is the future Americans are staring right in the eye and have irreversibly chosen, like the moth tragically flies to the light in great Hope.</p>
<p>But while apprehensive, both American left and right hold out some hope that this will not happen. Hope that somehow, human genes upon migrating to America have irreversibly mutated in a mere century or less (clearly a biological impossibility) and therefore hope that Americans possessing these unique American genes will maintain &#8212; even under the welfare state incentives &#8212; their legendary ambition, optimism, desire and expectation to one day excel. Or they simply do not understand the very simple arithmetic reality that a two percent growth trendline, in a world that is growing by five percent, means the deterministic slide into decline at a three percent relentlessly compounding yearly rate. Or they do understand it but simply don’t care. They only see a couple of years ahead and think that consequences are far enough out into the future and corrective action wil somhow be an option it it does not work out. As for the right, they have their own delusions, like a non negligible proportion of “conservatives” who believe that The Divine is ultimately on America’s side, so what can go wrong?</p>
<p>But by the time reality smashes these Hopes for both left and right, it will be too late. WAY too late for any one citizen group to take the first unilateral step towards withdrawing from the welfare state, where everyone is everyone else’s partial slave. You withdraw, you loose your slave but remain a slave to others. Nobody steps forward, decline continues under a severely sub-par low-motivation growth trendline.</p>
<p>Once sandwiched between America on the top and the rising emerging world at the bottom, and continuing their way to decline, Europeans must be partially consoled that America is finally stepping on the same low-motivation, low-growth banana peel. They do though seem to be still <a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/obama-disappoints-expectations-of-climate-change-action-at-doha-summit-a-871193.html" rel="nofollow"> complaining that America is not killing its motivation and prosperity fast enough.</a> </p>
<p>The western world lemmings that Americans have now decided to join, deserve every bit of the decline that is in store for them. Watching this unfold will be at least partially entertaining to me while I’m kept warm by the American furniture that HopNChange is burning, away and insulated from the rat-race of the “greedy”. If you decide to do the same, just make sure you secure a salvage boat for you and/or your kids &#8212; for when the furniture eventually runs out into a rather fast decline – sooner rather than later. OR…, if the left is ultimately right (no pun intended), continue living-on happily, in perpetuity, in a high growth happy America, while you enjoy and consume the work of others, some distant motivated highly capable greedy individuals, or the unexceptional work of less motivated mediocre people who coming together under mandatory collectivism perform Paul Krugman economic magic and prosper.  </p>
<p>You decide what is wiser to do on a personal level. Cheer up! The future looks bright!!! The years of decline can be happy if you play your cards right and secure a life boat. Take it from an ex-European with some proportion of Greek blood. You find yourselves in the same environment as you are headed into, you WILL react the same way! Bye-bye America. American voter lemmings keep me warm with your furniture for a few more years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/06/just-a-reminder-this-is-a-spending-crisis-not-a-revenue-crisis/

Good piece putting the emphasis back on the real problem - spending!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/06/just-a-reminder-this-is-a-spending-crisis-not-a-revenue-crisis/" rel="nofollow">http://hotair.com/archives/2012/12/06/just-a-reminder-this-is-a-spending-crisis-not-a-revenue-crisis/</a></p>
<p>Good piece putting the emphasis back on the real problem &#8211; spending!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly! And if they decide to fight, they fight to the death! If you&#039;re going to get the punishment, it better be worth it! Endure some short term blame but when things improve, you&#039;ll get some of the credit. (Of course, they won&#039;t get all of the credit. I cannot count how many times I hear how President Clinton created a surplus or how Clinton balanced the budget!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! And if they decide to fight, they fight to the death! If you&#8217;re going to get the punishment, it better be worth it! Endure some short term blame but when things improve, you&#8217;ll get some of the credit. (Of course, they won&#8217;t get all of the credit. I cannot count how many times I hear how President Clinton created a surplus or how Clinton balanced the budget!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Richards</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Richards]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jason, I&#039;m 100% with you on Door Number 1.  The Republicans WILL get all the blame if they have any fingerprints on it at all.  Let Obama own it - lock, stock, and barrel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, I&#8217;m 100% with you on Door Number 1.  The Republicans WILL get all the blame if they have any fingerprints on it at all.  Let Obama own it &#8211; lock, stock, and barrel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMO, the Republicans have two options:

1. Give Obama what he wants, vote present and let him own it. When the economy tanks, the blame will be squarely on Obama. (Everything except the debt limit increase!)

2. If they don&#039;t go with option 1, the GOP will get all the blame. If they&#039;re going to get all the blame, then they should fight for everything they want since they are getting the blame. Why give in to Obama&#039;s demands if you&#039;re going to get blamed for all of the negative consequences?

I&#039;d like to see immediate cuts to spending, but the GOP is stupid. They&#039;ll probably agree to future cuts, that will quickly disappear. The only way you can capitulate on increasing the top tax rate is if you get immediate cuts, no increase to capital gains and a corp tax cut.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, the Republicans have two options:</p>
<p>1. Give Obama what he wants, vote present and let him own it. When the economy tanks, the blame will be squarely on Obama. (Everything except the debt limit increase!)</p>
<p>2. If they don&#8217;t go with option 1, the GOP will get all the blame. If they&#8217;re going to get all the blame, then they should fight for everything they want since they are getting the blame. Why give in to Obama&#8217;s demands if you&#8217;re going to get blamed for all of the negative consequences?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see immediate cuts to spending, but the GOP is stupid. They&#8217;ll probably agree to future cuts, that will quickly disappear. The only way you can capitulate on increasing the top tax rate is if you get immediate cuts, no increase to capital gains and a corp tax cut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Republicans Should Keep their No-Tax-Hike Promises</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Republicans Should Keep their No-Tax-Hike Promises]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 16:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Read More By Daniel Mitchell . [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read More By Daniel Mitchell . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crisbd</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/dont-get-bamboozled-by-the-fiscal-cliff-five-policy-reasons-and-five-political-reasons-why-republicans-should-keep-their-no-tax-hike-promises/#comment-48190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crisbd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=20400#comment-48190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You talk about honesty, Dan. Why not use honest maths only, and convert all politicians&#039; budget numbers into real increases - which means comparing them with last year&#039;s actual numbers.
 
Any company executives would get thrown in jail if they used such dishonest maths. If companies have to use generally accepted accounting principles, then shouldn&#039;t politicians as well?
 
There are laws against dishonest company accounts, accountants and heads, shouldn&#039;t they also be used against similarly dishonest government accounts and accountants...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You talk about honesty, Dan. Why not use honest maths only, and convert all politicians&#8217; budget numbers into real increases &#8211; which means comparing them with last year&#8217;s actual numbers.</p>
<p>Any company executives would get thrown in jail if they used such dishonest maths. If companies have to use generally accepted accounting principles, then shouldn&#8217;t politicians as well?</p>
<p>There are laws against dishonest company accounts, accountants and heads, shouldn&#8217;t they also be used against similarly dishonest government accounts and accountants&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
