Comments on: For Nutty English Bureaucrats, Ideological Bias and Political Correctness Are More Important than the Well-Being of Children

By: Poster's Paradise » Liberty Writer

Poster's Paradise » Liberty Writer — Mon, 14 Jan 2013 15:02:38 +0000

[...] battle, with the United Kingdom recently throwing down the gauntlet with a decision to take kids away from their foster family because the mom and dad didn’t believe in unlimited immigration. The United States responded by [...]

By: Suspending a Little Boy for Playing Toy Gun with His Hand? I’m Embarrassed for my Country « International Liberty

Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:46:34 +0000

[...] battle, with the United Kingdom recently throwing down the gauntlet with a decision to take kids away from their foster family because the mom and dad didn’t believe in unlimited [...]

By: Another Danger! Chocolate Pudding | Tennesseans Watching Federal & State Government

Mon, 24 Dec 2012 22:09:57 +0000

[...] Denying children a home because the foster family didn’t believe in unlimited immigration. [...]

By: Stories Like this Lead Me to Think there’s No Hope for the United Kingdom « International Liberty

Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:25:45 +0000

[...] Denying children a home because the foster family didn’t believe in unlimited immigration. [...]

By: Attack of the Taxpayer-Eating Zombie Bureaucrats « International Liberty

Attack of the Taxpayer-Eating Zombie Bureaucrats « International Liberty — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:19:07 +0000

[...] British bureaucrats took some kids away from their foster family because the parents didn’t believe in unlimited immigration, and, second, the U.K. government [...]

By: Richard

Richard — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:00:54 +0000

This wasn’t just one bureaucrat over-reaching their authority. Here’s the Director defending it:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20475321

Yes, the Council are now “investigating”, but probably only because there’s an election there on Thursday (the town’s MP having resigned after being caught fiddling his expenses on an even greater scale than usual).

What a place!

By: Donald Large

Donald Large — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:32:24 +0000

HI Dan: You may be being a wee bit unfair to the U.K.here, as this does not seem much different than the various local American politicians who want to prevent Chick-Fil-A from opening franchises in their towns because they do not like the political views of the company’s owner. The poster is great, though.

By: crisbd

crisbd — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:55:38 +0000

Why have the council workers not been named, and their names even removed? When you name such people, the publicity makes it less likely they’ll act in such an outrageous manner again.

Don’t you want to do all you can to discourage such behaviour?

By: Richard Evans

Richard Evans — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:33:34 +0000

An update for you, Rotherham council have now said there will be an inquiry into this case. And senior members of ALL political parties have called for an investigation and said the actions of the council were wrong

By: Richard

Richard — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:31:15 +0000

This story is terrible in itself. But to make matters even worse it was that same local council bureaucracy who turned a blind eye to paedophile gangs abusing children under its care.

(warning – link not suitable for children; in fact only suitable for those with strong stomachs)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2207756/Police-turned-blind-eye-South-Yorkshire-sex-grooming-gangs-decade.html

It seems they are happy with children being left with paedophiles, but not with UKIP members.

By: Brian Richard Allen (@Brian_R_Allen)

Brian Richard Allen (@Brian_R_Allen) — Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:06:41 +0000

…. “racism” is probably an inherent flaw in the Human Species ….

Either that or its just a word used by the inherently flawed to dissuade disagreement!