“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

Let’s think about this for ONE rational minute. Yes, a well regulated militia within each state DOES help protect the State from other states and especially THE FEDERAL GVT! Point made and understood by this amendment.

Are you stupid enough to think that “the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms” really only pertains to specific people and only people in the militia? You’re a fucking idiot – and the Supreme Court says so.

In Parker v. District of Columbia (March 2007), the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban on grounds that it violates the Second Amendment’s guarantee of an individual right to bear arms. The case is being appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller, which may soon address the meaning of the Second Amendment. Almost any standard would be an improvement over Miller.

It was designed so that every person (that’s the people part of that amendment) have the right to KEEP and BEAR arms. Not the gvt, not the state and not the militia, but the people, you dumshit. So that if NECESSARY when the States needs a militia, they have one to protect and defend their state. So, you also think it’s only for that one sole purpose? When this was written there was the common sense understanding as a lifestyle that each man can feed and protect himself with his arms but will lend himself to the State when needed. You have no freaking common sense as so many haven’t either so I guess times have changed in that respect and all the more reason why we should fight to keep our freedom to keep and bear arms – because of fucking idiots like you… and the fact that people like you see nothing tyrannous about our gvt amazes m how stupid the populous truly is.