Comments on: Sequestration Is a Small Step in Right Direction, not Something to Be Feared

By: and whenever a woman who is not dressed conservatively walks by7

and whenever a woman who is not dressed conservatively walks by7 — Sat, 25 May 2013 03:43:57 +0000

This will be a excellent blog, might you be involved in doing an interview regarding how you created it? If so e-mail me!

By: Open letter to President Obama (Part 324) Higher Taxes Mean Bigger Government, not Lower Deficits | The Daily Hatch

Wed, 22 May 2013 11:52:17 +0000

[…] tell us that the money will be used to reduce the deficit, but at the same time they want to cancel the sequester, thus eliminating the only source of spending restraint from the 2011 debt-limit […]

By: Opinion: The Fiscal Cliff | the watercoooler

Opinion: The Fiscal Cliff | the watercoooler — Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:19:22 +0000

[...] And we may even lose the sequester, the provision that was included in the 2011 debt limit that would have slightly reduced the growth of government over the next 10 years. [...]

By: The Sequester is a Good Thing! | God's Word for Women

The Sequester is a Good Thing! | God's Word for Women — Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:25:16 +0000

[...] The looters and moochers in Washington are increasingly agitated by the prospect of sequestration. [...]

By: The Sequester Should Be Embraced, not Feared « International Liberty

The Sequester Should Be Embraced, not Feared « International Liberty — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:36:22 +0000

[...] The looters and moochers in Washington are increasingly agitated by the prospect of sequestration. [...]

By: The Sequester May Not Be “Fair,” but It’s Real and It Would Slow the Growth of Government « International Liberty

Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:41:22 +0000

[...] In reality, the sequester merely means a reduction in the growth of federal spending. Even if we have the sequester, the burden of government spending will still be about $2 trillion higher in 10 years. [...]

By: Grading the Fiscal Cliff Deal: Terrible, but Could Be Worse « International Liberty

Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:21:12 +0000

[...] And we may even lose the sequester, the provision that was included in the 2011 debt limit that would have slightly reduced the growth of government over the next 10 years. [...]

By: Why Turning the Other Cheek Will Set the Republicans Free from the Fiscal Cliff « hollierthanthee

Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:16:33 +0000

[...] guys (and gals!) are calling for will not even make a dent in the deficit, let alone the debt. The “draconian cuts” are a joke and are not the issue, or the problem, [...]

By: Obama's Soak-the-'Rich' Tax Hikes are Worse than the Fiscal Cliff - Jarkesy Political

Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:09:17 +0000

[...] actually will fall off two fiscal cliffs in January, but only one of them is bad. The good fiscal cliff is the so-called sequester, which is the inside-the-beltway term for automatic spending cuts. These aren’t really [...]

By: I have done everything in my power to get Republicans in Congress to vote against debt ceiling increase « HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth

Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:22:10 +0000

[...] tell us that the money will be used to reduce the deficit, but at the same time they want to cancel the sequester, thus eliminating the only source of spending restraint from the 2011 debt-limit [...]

By: Higher Taxes Mean Bigger Government, not Lower Deficits « International Liberty

Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:21:11 +0000

By: In a Debate for U.S. News & World Report, I Argue Obama’s Plan Is Worse than the Fiscal Cliff « International Liberty

Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:05:02 +0000

By: Obama’s Soak-the-’Rich’ Tax Hikes Are Worse Than the Fiscal Cliff | News from around the world

Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:05:31 +0000

By: Republican Keynesians Come Out of the Woodwork to Oppose Sequestration « International Liberty

Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:26:35 +0000

[...] are now sounding like born-again Keynesians. They object to the automatic budget savings – known as sequestration – that are scheduled to take effect next year, and they are warning that less government [...]

By: A Sequester Doesn’t Mean the Sky Is Falling…not even for the Defense Budget « International Liberty

Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:56:31 +0000

[...] I like sequestration. Automatic budget cuts might not be the best way of reducing the burden of government spending, but a sequester is better than leaving the federal budget on autopilot. [...]

By: Will Boehner Blow His Bluff?

Will Boehner Blow His Bluff? — Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:35 +0000

[...] trillion increase in the borrowing limit, the largest such hike in the nation’s history, was a slight reduction in the growth rate of spending via sequestration — which Congress is busy crafting legislation to overturn — and the ill-fated Supercommittee [...]

By: NetRight Daily » Boehner’s bluff

NetRight Daily » Boehner’s bluff — Wed, 16 May 2012 13:34:35 +0000

[...] $2.1 trillion increase in the borrowing limit, the largest such hike in the nation’s history, was a slight reduction in the growth rate of spending via sequestration — which Congress is busy crafting legislation to overturn — and the ill-fated Supercommittee [...]

By: Dan Mitchell demonstrates again that spending is our problem but it can be solved « HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:21:55 +0000

[...] be right if they’re predicting politicians are too irresponsible and profligate to accept about $100 billion of annual reductions from a $4,000 billion-plus budget, but that underscores the core message that there needs to be a cap on total spending so that the [...]

By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink | Republican Party of Door County

Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:25:05 +0000

By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink « News « @griffinrc

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:56:31 +0000

[...] right if they’re predicting politicians are too irresponsible and profligate to accept about $100 billion of annual reductions from a $4,000 billion-plus budget, but that underscores the core message that there needs to be a cap on total spending so that the [...]

By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink « International Liberty

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:17:40 +0000

By: The Wrong Kind of Entitlement Reform Could Be Worse than No Entitlement Reform « International Liberty

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:55:40 +0000

[...] o The sequester is a good outcome. [...]

By: Sequestration budget cuts won't be cuts at all | Western Free Press

Sequestration budget cuts won't be cuts at all | Western Free Press — Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:31:26 +0000

[...] From the irreplaceable Dan Mitchell: They tell as that a sequester would mean “savage” and “draconian” budget cuts. The only “responsible” approach, we are told, is to go along with a tax increase. [...]

By: Supercommittee Fight May Reveal the GOP Is Beyond Saving | Rid Congress of RINO's

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:42:16 +0000

[...] analysis of how the Bush-Obama spending binge worsened America’s fiscal situation, I think this chart from a previous post says it all (click to [...]

By: Supercommittee Fight May Tell Us Whether the GOP Is Beyond Salvage « International Liberty

Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:39:16 +0000

[...] of how the Bush-Obama spending binge worsened America’s fiscal situation, I think this chart from a previous post says it [...]

By: What Matters More to Republicans, Defending Taxpayers or Expanding Government? « International Liberty

Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:16:37 +0000

[...] is nonsense. As I’ve already explained, a sequester simply means that spending climbs by $2 trillion between now and 2021 rather than [...]

By: Some “Conservative” Members of the Stupid Party Push for Tax Increases to Enable Bigger Government « International Liberty

Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:00:59 +0000

[...] Washington. For American taxpayers, however, the only good conclusion is a Supercommittee deadlock, followed by a sequester. Rate this: Share this:PrintEmailFacebookTwitterMoredeliciousDiggFarkLinkedInRedditStumbleUponLike [...]

By: A Supercommittee Tax-Hike Surrender Means Republicans Would Snatch Defeat from the Jaws of Victory « International Liberty

Mon, 07 Nov 2011 13:13:59 +0000

[...] Republicans have complete power to achieve a victory in this battle. All that’s needed is for them to say no to a tax hike. That will lead to a Supercommittee stalemate, which will then lead to automatic budget savings known as sequestration. [...]

By: drrik

drrik — Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:03:32 +0000

Power corrupts.
AKA _years of having no consequences for ones actions is addictive and principles are lost track of.

By: ECM

ECM — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:40:13 +0000

After a media that hates their guts publically flogs them, they’ll fold. I’m not sure if that’s “stupid”, per se, but it will be spineless.