Now that the debt-limit fight is basically over (the Senate will join the House in approving it later today), we need to immediately prepare for the next stage in the fight to stop big government and restore economic liberty.
President Obama and other leftists clearly have signaled that they want the new “super committee” – which will recommend $1.5 trillion of deficit reduction before Thanksgiving – to be a vehicle for “balance” and “shared sacrifice.” But if you look in a Statism-to-English dictionary, you learn that “balance” is a code word for higher taxes and “shared sacrifice” means class-warfare taxation.
I’ve already explained that a truly balanced approach requires nothing but spending restraint. And I’ve explained why Obama’s class-warfare taxation is misguided.
Today, let’s look at three real-world examples. We’ll start with the President’s home state. Early this year, using sneaky maneuvering, Illinois politicians raised the state’s income tax rate. I warned that this would drive jobs and businesses out of the state. That was an easy prediction, of course, and we’re already seeing results.Here’s a blurb from a Chicago Sun-Times story.
It’s becoming a habit around here — another day, another stalwart of financial services in Chicago threatening to leave town. On Thursday, it was the Chicago Board Options Exchange suggesting that higher corporate taxes in Illinois could cause it to take jobs out of state. The CBOE’s warning came a day after CME Group Inc. said the same thing. CME owns the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Chicago Board of Trade. The options market, with its headquarters and trading floor at 400 S. La Salle, employs about 580 people, not including traders who use its facilities. A CBOE spokesman said in a statement that “economic realities” could force a move.
Because the CME and CBOE are so high profile, I suspect Illinois politicians will provide some sort of one-off tax holiday or back-door subsidy to prevent this from happening. That won’t solve the problem, of course, which is that high tax rates inexorably will undermine the state’s competitiveness and that ordinary people will pay the highest price.
Yet this is what Obama wants to do to America. The United Kingdom is another example of how punitive class-warfare taxes backfire. Here are excerpts from a story at Tax-News.com.
In a tax-blow to the UK exchequer, the Virgin Group is planning to shift a portion of its operations to Switzerland to maximize tax efficiency. Virgin Enterprises, which owns the trademarks and rights to the Virgin brand will be relocated to Geneva to achieve tax efficiencies not possible in London. According to the conglomerate, the decision is as a result of plans to generate new revenue from franchising arrangements, particularly in emerging markets. …Virgin becomes the latest in a growing list of firms which have moved aspects of their businesses out of the UK for tax purposes in recent years.
Last but not least, let’s look at one example of what happens when nations do the opposite of Obamanomics. Bulgaria recently implemented a low-rate 10 percent flat tax. Is it helping? Well, here’s a passage from another Tax-news.com story.
Business formations in Bulgaria by entities from Romania and Greece have risen markedly in recent, new statistics show – a testament to the reforms put in place by Bulgarian authorities to attract foreign investment. Figures reported in the Bulgarian media show that the number of Romanian companies registered in Bulgaria soared from 33 in 2006, to 272 last year. Meanwhile, the number of Greek formations increased three-fold in the same period, according to tax authority data, to 2,072 in 2010. There were 800 registrations in the first half of this year alone, a trend that is likely to continue for the remainder of the year. Bulgaria offers one of the lowest corporate income tax rates in Europe at 10%. This is 15% lower than the rate offered in Greece, and 6% lower than in Romania.
And let’s not forget that zero-income-tax Texas is doing very well in America while high-tax states such as California (and, of course, Illinois) are losing jobs. But that’s a story for another day.
I’m wondering why Daniel chose the CME, an entity that exists to facilitate commodities speculation, as an example of companies fleeing the coop? Why didn’t he choose the X-Ray equipment business of General Electric, which just announced that it’s moving its headquarters and engineering staff from Waukesha, Wisconsin to Beijing, China? (And you can bet that a substantial part of GE’s X-ray equipment manufacturing will follow.) Wisconsin has taken concrete steps to control costs by reigning in its government employee unions. Why didn’t GE’s chairman and CEO, Jeff Immelt, recognize the achievement and reward the state by staying put?
Speaking of GE and Jeff Immelt and Daniel’s favorite state, Texas, GE is about to open a brand new railroad locomotive factory in Fort Worth. They’ve been manufacturing locomotives in Erie, PA for over 100 years and there is substantial excess capacity at the Erie operations. Rumor has it that GE will soon move locomotive parts manufacturing from places like Grove City, PA to Mexico. The new non-union labor force in Fort Worth along with outsourced parts manufacturing in Mexico will bring substantially more to GE’s bottom line. And that’s really what the globalist corporations care about.
And just one more head scratcher: Whatever possessed Barak Obama to appoint Jeff Immelt to head the “President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness?” That’s equivalent to placing a fox in charge of the hen house.