<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Simple to Balance the Budget without Higher Taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/</link>
	<description>Restraining Government in America and Around the World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open letter to President Obama (Part 242) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-56984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Open letter to President Obama (Part 242) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-56984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018 &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-55877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[If Spending Is Capped So It Grows at the Rate of Inflation, the Budget Is Balanced in 2018 &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-55877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It is really simple after all to balance the budget according to Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-39580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It is really simple after all to balance the budget according to Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-39580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s Simple to Balance the Budget with Modest Spending Restraint &#124; Sago</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-36947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It’s Simple to Balance the Budget with Modest Spending Restraint &#124; Sago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-36947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s Simple to Balance the Budget with Modest Spending Restraint &#124; Cato @ Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-36787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It’s Simple to Balance the Budget with Modest Spending Restraint &#124; Cato @ Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-36787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s Simple to Balance the Budget with Modest Spending Restraint &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-36768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Simple to Balance the Budget with Modest Spending Restraint &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-36768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first did this back in September 2010, and showed that we could balance the budget in 10 years if federal spending was limited so it grew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (“Thirsty Thursday”, Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-32482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (“Thirsty Thursday”, Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 12:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-32482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Wunderlich</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-30359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Wunderlich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 06:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-30359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eliminating baseline budgeting would keep the growth of government low but it would also force the government to become more efficient. If automatic increases in your budget are already baked in the cake, why would you worry about terminating programs that have poor results? By removing the unlimited money, you would force Congress to cut inefficient programs and concentrate resources on productive programs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliminating baseline budgeting would keep the growth of government low but it would also force the government to become more efficient. If automatic increases in your budget are already baked in the cake, why would you worry about terminating programs that have poor results? By removing the unlimited money, you would force Congress to cut inefficient programs and concentrate resources on productive programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Mitchell demonstrates again that spending is our problem but it can be solved &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22365</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Mitchell demonstrates again that spending is our problem but it can be solved &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (&#8220;Thirsty Thursday,&#8221; Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (&#8220;Thirsty Thursday,&#8221; Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#124; Tennesseans Watching Federal &#38; State Government</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#124; Tennesseans Watching Federal &#38; State Government]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#124; Cato @ Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#124; Cato @ Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#171; News &#171; @griffinrc</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22166</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#171; News &#171; @griffinrc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  Back in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Back in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink - Big Government</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink - Big Government]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink - Forbes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-22131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-22131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of fiscal discipline and limited annual spending increases to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons why Mark Pryor will be defeated in 2014 (Part 8) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-20193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reasons why Mark Pryor will be defeated in 2014 (Part 8) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-20193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (&#8220;Thirsty Thursday&#8221;, Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-18592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (&#8220;Thirsty Thursday&#8221;, Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 22:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-18592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (Part 6 Thirsty Thursday, Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-14290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dear Senator Pryor, why not pass the Balanced Budget Amendment? (Part 6 Thirsty Thursday, Open letter to Senator Pryor) &#171; HaltingArkansasLiberalswithTruth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-14290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s Send Obama to the Vatican for an Economics Lesson &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-13995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s Send Obama to the Vatican for an Economics Lesson &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-13995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] other words, Milton Friedman was correct many years ago when he warned that, “In the long run government will spend whatever the tax system will raise, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other words, Milton Friedman was correct many years ago when he warned that, “In the long run government will spend whatever the tax system will raise, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; New CBO Numbers Confirm-Once Again-that Modest Spending Restraint Can Balance the Budget - Big Government</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-13760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; New CBO Numbers Confirm-Once Again-that Modest Spending Restraint Can Balance the Budget - Big Government]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-13760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that these numbers are a surprise. I got similar results after last year&#8217;s update, and also earlier this year when the Economic and Budget Outlook was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that these numbers are a surprise. I got similar results after last year&#8217;s update, and also earlier this year when the Economic and Budget Outlook was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New CBO Numbers Confirm &#8211; Once Again &#8211; that Modest Spending Restraint Can Balance the Budget &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-13738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New CBO Numbers Confirm &#8211; Once Again &#8211; that Modest Spending Restraint Can Balance the Budget &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-13738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that these numbers are a surprise. I got similar results after last year&#8217;s update, and also earlier this year when the Economic and Budget Outlook was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that these numbers are a surprise. I got similar results after last year&#8217;s update, and also earlier this year when the Economic and Budget Outlook was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill jones</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-13637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bill jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 20:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-13637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your graph suggests federal revenues will increase from slightly over $two-billion to more than $four-billion by the year 2020.  That&#039;s double what they are now or about a 100% increase.  That in turn averages out to a 10% percent increase per year.  That&#039;s foolish. Historically, federal revenues only increase by about two or three percent per year.  

To average an annual 10% average rise in federal revenues, you would need MUCH higher revenues...i.e. a huge tax increase.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your graph suggests federal revenues will increase from slightly over $two-billion to more than $four-billion by the year 2020.  That&#8217;s double what they are now or about a 100% increase.  That in turn averages out to a 10% percent increase per year.  That&#8217;s foolish. Historically, federal revenues only increase by about two or three percent per year.  </p>
<p>To average an annual 10% average rise in federal revenues, you would need MUCH higher revenues&#8230;i.e. a huge tax increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HoosierAccess &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Fundamental Failures of the &#8220;Balanced Approach.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-13558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HoosierAccess &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Fundamental Failures of the &#8220;Balanced Approach.&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-13558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] such as inflation, more population, and economic expansion) by more than 7 percent each year. Balancing the budget is simple so long as politicians increase spending at a slower rate. If they freeze the budget, we almost balance the budget by 2017. If federal spending is capped so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes &#124; Cato @ Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-10679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes &#124; Cato @ Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 06:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-10679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservatives for America</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-10668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes&#160;&#124;&#160;Conservatives for America]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 14:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-10668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes - Big Government</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-10664</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[&#187; Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes - Big Government]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 13:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-10664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes &#171; International Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-10657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seven Reasons to Oppose Higher Taxes &#171; International Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 12:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-10657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the budget makes the same point as reason #1 about why higher taxes are unnecessary. Simply stated, balancing the budget merely requires a modest degree of fiscal discipline, such as capping spending so it only grows 2 percent per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Budget Cap at 3% &#124; Cato @ Liberty</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-8948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federal Budget Cap at 3% &#124; Cato @ Liberty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-8948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] discussed a spending growth cap in more detail here and here and here. Dan Mitchell has made similar observations about spending growth rates. The folks at One Cent Solution are recommending a tighter cap.  Chris [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed a spending growth cap in more detail here and here and here. Dan Mitchell has made similar observations about spending growth rates. The folks at One Cent Solution are recommending a tighter cap.  Chris [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A simple plan to cut government growth : USACTION NEWS</title>
		<link>http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2010/09/22/its-simple-to-balance-the-budget-without-higher-taxes/#comment-8927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A simple plan to cut government growth : USACTION NEWS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/?p=5198#comment-8927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] discussed a spending growth cap in more detail here and here and here. Dan Mitchell has made similar observations about spending growth rates. The folks at One Cent Solution are recommending a tighter cap.   [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discussed a spending growth cap in more detail here and here and here. Dan Mitchell has made similar observations about spending growth rates. The folks at One Cent Solution are recommending a tighter cap.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
