Clemson University was a big rival when I was at the University of Georgia, so it seems natural that I am locking horns with someone from that school as we debate whether we should have a flat tax or the current system. You can see both arguments at this link, and there also is a chance to cast an online vote. At the time this was posted, the flat tax was winning with 65 percent of the vote.
Debating the Flat Tax for U.S. News & World Report
April 12, 2010 by Dan Mitchell
6 Responses
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Posts
- Responding to Scandals and Corruption, the IRS Rewards Itself with Giant Bonuses
- Europe’s Politicians Learned the Wrong Lesson from Saint Augustine
- What’s the Better Role Model, France or Switzerland?
- Frankenstein’s Revenge
- Siding with the Heritage Foundation in the “Austerity” Fight with Paul Krugman and the Washington Post
Pages
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
Tags
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Atlas Shrugged
- Ausrian Economics
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Bernanke
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Brain drain
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Charity
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Constitution
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economics
- Education
- Election
- Elitism
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Estonia
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gordon Brown
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hong Kong
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- Inflation
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Ireland
- IRS
- Italy
- Japan
- JCT
- Jobs
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Liechtenstein
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Media Bias
- Medicaid
- Medicare
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Mitchell's Theorem
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Jersey
- New York
- News Appearance
- North Korea
- Obama
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paul Ryan
- Paulson
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Portugal
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Republicans
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- Savings
- School Choice
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Softball
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Switzerland
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Third party payer
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- TSA
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- VAT
- Video
- Vouchers
- Walter Williams
- Waste
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
As of now, the poll is nearly 3-to-1 in favor of a flat tax. Good job with the argument, Dan.
[...] can’t resist pointing out that I am part of a debate for U.S. News & World Report on the flat tax vs. the current system. For those of you who have an opinion on this matter, don’t hesitate to cast a [...]
[...] can’t resist pointing out that I am part of a debate for U.S. News & World Report on the flat tax vs. the current system. For those of you who have an opinion on this matter, don’t hesitate to cast a vote. [...]
The Income tax system was made the way it was for a reason. In my opinon, i think that the income tax system we have currently is far more fair than flat tax. If we were to convert to a flat tax system, it would only benefit the more wealthy beings, and the lower class citizens would pay about the same. This is because in order for a flat tax system to function, the tax would have to be reasonable enough for the lower class citizens, therefore resulting in the wealthier ones paying less. What i’m trying to say is that the wealthy people are the ones who will benefit from the taxing system change. So changing the way we are taxed won’t make much of a difference as far as fairness goes.
It’s now Wednesday, January 11, 2012. and 87.71% of respondents say YES to a Flat Income Tax in the United States.
Only 12.29% say no!
Guess that means that 87% of the country see the enormous waste by Government and want it reduced.
And Anonymous (immediately above) seems to be unable to accept that the average American can think more rationally than he/she/it can.
Hey crisbd
You are so dumb, you probably made that poll you’re referring to yourself.
I myself created a 100% unbiased survey and asked 355,000,000 Americans
91% of them, when given the choices:
-flat tax
-fair tax
or -I hate the flat tax so much I would kill myself if it was law
chose option 3.
Out of over half of America’s population, NINETY ONE percent of them hate you and your flat tax so much that they would kill themselves if it was law.
And crisbd (immediately above) seems to be unable to accept that the average American can think more rationally than he/she/it can.