This video provides 12 reasons in less than 7 minutes.
Obamacare Will Be a Budget Buster
November 10, 2009 by Dan Mitchell
Posted in Big Government, CBO, Center for Freedom and Prosperity, Economics, Fiscal Policy, Government Spending, Health Care, Health Reform, Obama, Pelosi, Spending, Video | Tagged Big Government, Health Reform, Healthcare, Obama, Pelosi, Video | 42 Comments
42 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
-
Recent Posts
- What’s the Recipe for Growth and Prosperity?
- Is Mitt Romney a Keynesian?
- Obama’s Corporate Tax Refom: Rearranging the Deck Chairs on the Titanic?
- Based on Where the Top 1 Percent Lives, the Occupy Crowd Should Be Protesting Against Big Government
- Should the IRS Be Squandering $15 Million on P.R. Flacks to Improve its Image?
Pages
Visitors (beginning December 23, 2010)
Tags
Bailouts Big Government Bureaucracy Bureaucrats Class warfare Competitiveness Corruption Crime Debt Deficit Dependency Economics England Europe Fiscal Policy Free Markets Government-run healthcare Government intervention Government Spending Government stupidity Government waste Health Care Health Reform Higher Taxes Humor IRS Jobs Keynesian Economics Laffer Curve Liberty News Appearance Obama Obamacare Political Humor Regulation Republicans Statism stimulus Taxation Tax Competition Tax Haven Tax Increases Value-Added Tax VAT Welfare StateArchives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
-
Recent Comments
Categories
- 2nd Amendment
- African-Americans
- Al Gore
- Alarmism
- Argentina
- Atlas Shrugged
- Australia
- Austrian Economics
- Ayn Rand
- Bailout
- Balanced Budget
- Barney Frank
- Baseball
- Bernanke
- Big business
- Big Government
- Bob Dole Award
- Boondoggle
- Brain drain
- Bulldogs
- Bureaucracy
- Bureaucrats
- Bush
- California
- Canada
- Capital Gains Tax
- cash for clunkers
- Cato Institute
- CBO
- Center for Freedom and Prosperity
- Central planning
- Centralization
- Chile
- China
- Chris Christie
- Class warfare
- Climate change
- Clinton
- Cold War
- Collectivism
- Communism
- Competitiveness
- Congress
- Congressional Budget Office
- Constitution
- Corporate income tax
- Corporate tax
- Corruption
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Crime
- Cronyism
- Cuba
- Dan Hannan
- David Cameron
- Dawgs
- Death Tax
- Debt
- Deferral
- Deficit
- Delaware
- Democrats
- Dependency
- Deposit Insurance
- Discrimination
- Double Taxation
- Drug War
- Earmarks
- Easy money
- Economics
- Education
- Election
- Elitism
- Eminent Domain
- England
- Entitlements
- Environmentalism
- Euro
- Europe
- European Commission
- Executive pay
- Fair Tax
- Fannie Mae
- Fascism
- Fatal conceit
- Federal Reserve
- Federalism
- Financial Crisis
- Financial Privacy
- Finland
- Fiscal Crisis
- Fiscal Policy
- Flat Tax
- food nazi
- Food Stamps
- Foreign Aid
- Foreign Policy
- France
- Freddie Mac
- Free Markets
- Free Speech
- Free State Project
- Freedom
- Geithner
- General Motors
- Georgia
- Germany
- Gingrich
- Global Taxation
- Global warming
- Gordon Brown
- Government intervention
- Government Spending
- Government stupidity
- Government Thuggery
- Great Depression
- Greece
- Gross domestic product
- Gun control
- Harmonization
- Hayek
- Health Care
- Health Reform
- Higher Taxes
- Hoover
- Housing
- HUD
- Human Rights
- Humor
- Hypocrisy
- Iceland
- Illinois
- Immigration
- Income tax
- Inflation
- International bureaucracy
- International Criminal Court
- International Monetary Fund
- International Taxation
- Ireland
- IRS
- Italy
- Japan
- JCT
- Jobs
- John Stossel
- Joint Committee on Taxation
- Joker
- Jurisdictional Competition
- Kelo
- Keynes
- Keynesian
- KPMG
- Laffer Curve
- Lakers
- Leviathan
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Liechtenstein
- Lobbying
- Local government
- Marginal Tax Rate
- Media Bias
- Migration
- Minimum Wage
- Mitchell's Golden Rule
- Mitchell's Law
- Monaco
- Monetary Policy
- Money Laundering
- Moral Hazard
- nanny state
- National Education Association
- National Sales Tax
- Netherlands
- New Jersey
- New York
- News Appearance
- North Korea
- Obama
- OECD
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- PATRIOT Act
- Patriotism
- Patriots
- Paulson
- Pelosi
- Pets
- Philippines
- Podcast
- Political Correctness
- Political Humor
- Politicians
- Politics
- Polling Data
- Postal Service
- Poverty
- Price Controls
- Privacy
- Privatization
- Prohibition
- Property Rights
- Property Tax
- Prostitution
- Protectionism
- Public Opinion
- Race
- Rahn Curve
- Rand
- Rankings
- Reagan
- Recession
- Redistribution
- Regulation
- Republicans
- Roman Polanski
- Romney
- Roosevelt
- Russia
- Sales Tax
- School Choice
- Singapore
- Sleaze
- Slovakia
- Snow
- Soccer
- Social Security
- Social Security Privatization
- Socialism
- Softball
- South Korea
- Sovereignty
- Spain
- Spending
- States
- Statism
- stimulus
- Subsidies
- Supercommittee
- Supply-side economics
- Supreme Court
- Swedem
- Switzerland
- Tax avoidance
- Tax Competition
- Tax Compliance
- Tax evasion
- Tax Harmonization
- Tax Haven
- Tax Increase
- Tax Reform
- Taxation
- Taxpayer Ripoff
- Tea Party
- Territorial Taxation
- Terrorism
- Texas
- Thanksgiving
- Third party payer
- Tobacco
- Tobin Tax
- Toilet Paper
- Trade
- TSA
- Uncategorized
- Underground Economy
- Unemployment
- Union Bosses
- United Kingdom
- United Nations
- United States
- Value-Added Tax
- VAT
- Video
- Vouchers
- Walter Williams
- Waste
- Weekly Economics Lesson
- Welfare
- Welfare State
- World Bank
- Worldwide Taxation
- Yankees
[...] taxes tomorrow. You can draw your own conclusions, but keep in mind that CBO is now making the absurd claim that a giant new healthcare entitlement will reduce budget [...]
[...] of a terrible trend, not a profound paradigm shift. Yes, it is very bad news. Yes, it will cost more than politicians claimed. Yes, it will reduce the quality of care. All those things are true, but we [...]
[...] taxes tomorrow. You can draw your own conclusions, but keep in mind that CBO is now making the absurd claim that a giant new healthcare entitlement will reduce budget [...]
[...] to government somehow would create jobs. CBO also was a disaster on Obamacare, claiming that a giant new entitlement program would reduce budget deficits. And the legislative bureaucracy even has argued that higher tax rates boost [...]
[...] to government somehow would create jobs. CBO also was a disaster on Obamacare, claiming that a giant new entitlement program would reduce budget deficits. And the legislative bureaucracy even has argued that higher tax rates boost [...]
[...] to government somehow would create jobs. CBO also was a disaster on Obamacare, claiming that a giant new entitlement program would reduce budget deficits. And the legislative bureaucracy even has argued that higher tax rates boost [...]
[...] to government somehow would create jobs. CBO also was a disaster on Obamacare, claiming that a giant new entitlement program would reduce budget deficits. And the legislative bureaucracy even has argued that higher tax rates boost [...]
[...] since people from this Administration routinely say preposterous things (such as claiming that a giant new entitlement program will reduce red ink and asserting that nobody’s taxes have been [...]
[...] since people from this Administration routinely say preposterous things (such as claiming that a giant new entitlement program will reduce red ink and asserting that nobody’s taxes have been [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand thee burden of government, love thee failed stimulus or thee budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but certainly does not seem love there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] good news is that there’s no major initiative such as the so-called stimulus scheme or the government-run healthcare proposal. The bad news, though, is that government is far too big and Obama’s budget does [...]
[...] The good news is that there’s no major initiative such as the so-called stimulus scheme or the government-run healthcare proposal. The bad news, though, is that government is far too big and Obama’s budget does nothing [...]
[...] good news is that there’s no major initiative such as the so-called stimulus scheme or the government-run healthcare proposal. The bad news, though, is that government is far too big and Obama’s budget does [...]
[...] since people from this Administration routinely say preposterous things (such as claiming that a giant new entitlement program will reduce red ink and asserting that nobody’s taxes have been [...]
[...] not be any major initiatives to expand the burden of government, like the failed stimulus or the budget busting government-run healthcare scheme, but it certainly does not seem like there are any plans to reverse [...]
[...] The good news is that there’s no major initiative such as the so-called stimulus scheme or the government-run healthcare proposal. The bad news, though, is that government is far too big and Obama’s budget does nothing [...]
[...] couple of years have featured budget busting proposals such as the so-called stimulus scheme and a government-run healthcare [...]
[...] with faint praise. The absence of big initiatives such as the so-called stimulus scheme or a government-run healthcare plan simply means that there's no major new proposal to accelerate America's fiscal [...]
[...] couple of years have featured budget busting proposals such as the so-called stimulus scheme and a government-run healthcare [...]
[...] And because I like to brag when I get something right (to be fair, everyone knew the CBO numbers were dishonest and wrong, so I wasn’t exactly making a brilliant observation), I invite people to re-watch my video explaining how the politicians and their minions were lying to us. [...]
[...] And because I like to brag when I get something right (to be fair, everyone knew the CBO numbers were dishonest and wrong, so I wasn’t exactly making a brilliant observation), I invite people to re-watch my video explaining how the politicians and their minions were lying to us. [...]
[...] July 18, 2011 by Dan Mitchell The Beacon Hill Institute in Massachusetts has just released a very good – but very depressing study. The research finds that costs have jumped under Romneycare, but that’s not surprising. After all, politicians always underestimate the cost of new entitlements. [...]
[...] The good news is that there’s no major initiative such as the so-called stimulus scheme or the government-run healthcare proposal. The bad news, though, is that government is far too big and Obama’s budget does nothing [...]
[...] He pontificates about debt, but he voted for the fake stimulus and budget-busting Obamacare legislation. [...]
[...] He pontificates about debt, but he voted for the fake stimulus and budget-busting Obamacare legislation. [...]
[...] Indeed, CBO’s failure to recognize that new programs will lure people into greater dependency is one of the biggest reasons that the bureaucracy routinely under-estimates the cost of new programs. This is a point I stressed in my video explaining why Obamacare will be far more costly than CBO predicted. [...]
[...] the cost of new programs. This is a point I stressed in my video explaining why Obamacare will be far more costly than CBO [...]
[...] has all the gory details. The OECD bureaucrats (who get tax-free salaries, by the way) endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for [...]
[...] Freedom and Prosperity study has all the gory details, revealing that OECD bureaucrats endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for [...]
[...] Freedom and Prosperity study has all the gory details, revealing that OECD bureaucrats endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for [...]
[...] Freedom and Prosperity study has all the gory details, revealing that OECD bureaucrats endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for [...]
[...] The good news is that there’s no major initiative such as the so-called stimulus scheme or the government-run healthcare proposal. The bad news, though, is that government is far too big and Obama’s budget does nothing [...]
[...] all the gory details. The OECD bureaucrats (who get tax-free salaries, by the way) endorsed Obamacare, supported the failed stimulus, and are big advocates of a value-added tax for [...]
[...] my area of expertise, but I mostly agree with Alter’s assessment. For better or worse (and you know how I feel), the President put everything on the line to enact Obamacare. That was bad for the nation, but I [...]
[...] President Obama’s two biggest “achievements” since taking office are the so-called stimulus and government-run healthcare. [...]
[...] adopting Policy A or repealing Policy B is a magic elixir. And if that means adopting a flat tax or repealing Obamacare, I’ll certainly be [...]